The context to me seems like pretty clear EF5 damage, like you said. I think most of the homes in the higher context were quite small and didn't have connections per DAT. I think it is probably hard to justify an EF5 rating post 2011 without proper anchoring. The church seems a bit different, I don't know anything about engineering or construction so can't make a very insightful comment really. Some debris on the foundation is still there, but contextual damage here and especially in the background is very intense. Probably quite borderline but could see EF4/190 being justified, but again I'm completely unqualified and unknowledgeable in engineering and home construction.