New video by TornadoTRX - this video just makes me further question how this storm wasn’t given a higher rating.
This is an incredibly old post but I wanted to give some insight!
From what I've gathered, the NWS actually really wanted, or at least implied they wanted to give this one a higher rating. I spoke with some people internally, including the MIC for Lubbock, who expressed how limited their resources were when actually analyzing the event, and how hopefully a revision of scale will include external measurements and remote sensing to aid in ratings.
It's interesting to note there are some unwritten rules about tornado damage ratings. I initially was confused why Matador was not rated EF4 based on tree damage (DOD 5 Hardwood UB (167 MPH). It seems though, tornadoes are unable to have EF4 tree damage rated unless a structure also supports that rating, pretty interesting. Tim Marshall was part of the survey team for Matador, he had comments to say too, such as that some homes "had sporadic bolting of plate. Some bolts had nuts and washers while others did not." Which would put essentially every structure at a LB (Lower bound) DI.
The biggest head scratcher (and is still so even after talking to as many people as I could) is that the Dollar General in matador was completely flattened and mangled, in similar fashion to the Dollar General in Marietta, OK rated EF4 this year, and other dollar stores like in Rolling Fork, MS. Tim Marshall even commented "Bolt securing column base plate was pulled out of the concrete foundation. Also note the grass packing indicating winds were still quite strong after the building failed." So I really have no clue why this was overlooked as an EF4 DI. Who knows. Glad people in here found the video helpful.
