Casuarina Head
Member
“Up in the air”? I thought earlier development would significantly reduce the high-end “ceiling” over most of the warm sector in OK?Up in the air
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
“Up in the air”? I thought earlier development would significantly reduce the high-end “ceiling” over most of the warm sector in OK?Up in the air
Not if it stays south where it is. Up closer to Red River early would be problematic.“Up in the air”? I thought earlier development would significantly reduce the high-end “ceiling” over most of the warm sector in OK?
This is a single storm that is going up all the way down near San Angelo. This isn’t along the red river.“Up in the air”? I thought earlier development would significantly reduce the high-end “ceiling” over most of the warm sector in OK?
I think a detail to note about Bently's outlook is that Bunting appears to be lead forecaster today and he had high enough confidence in Bently's outlook that he let it be issued without addition.Lol….least Bentley had enough sense increase the threat tomorrow. Back 10 percent hatched tornado ️
Not really liking how this guy is confusing people right now.
He also does the complete opposite and downplays threats, like he’s doing now, saying that this early convention will limit the threat in Oklahoma even though dews and cape are already sky high. SMHThat guy is annoying as hell. He cherry picks models and soundings to paint every single event as this high end sequence. The worst of wx twitter and has no clue what he’s talking about.
Yeah. He’s the guy that will post a sky high Nadocast from a single run for some one off slight risk in March to try and drum stuff up. He is the worstHe also does the complete opposite and downplays threats, like he’s doing now, saying that this early convention will limit the threat in Oklahoma even though dews and cape are already sky high. SMH
Not really liking how this guy is confusing people right now.
Not really liking how this guy is confusing people right now.
“Up in the air”? I thought earlier development would significantly reduce the high-end “ceiling” over most of the warm sector in OK?
The main issue, or at least one of the issues, that the SPC is unsure about is left movers/splits from north TX storms moving into OK and making the environment unfavorable there before cells can fire there. Some CAMs, such as the HRRR, have been showing this.He certainly has some interesting posts, especially on his personal account.
Regardless, not sure what, if any, impact storms in TX will have on convection farther north. Kind of doubtful it has a nominal influence, but could maybe effect boundaries and the extent of initiation in NW OK. Still, too soon to make much of a verdict.
View attachment 27764View attachment 27765
It's all good, every one of us occasionally crosses the line with a "post of passion". At least you admitted your mistake.That's a completely fair statement to make. That was a really stupid thing of me to say.
"18 Year Old Weather Enthusiast" are the first words in his bio.
I doubt he knows much, which is okay. I don't know much either, but I'm going to school for meteorology.
His problem is (just a theory) that he is posting stuff without fully comprehending what exactly he is posting, which is why he can't give clarity.
When I don't know what is going on, I bow out of the conversations and let people who know more than me explain what's going on. I think this guy has a case of main character syndrome.
Welp, no more squall line from the WPC.I do find it of some interest the WPC is forecasting a squall line developing by midnight.
View attachment 27744
I believe it's referencing the forecasted MCS late Sunday night into Monday morning. However, not all models are sold on the intensity of that portion of the event. If confidence were to increase, I wouldn't be surprised by a southward expansion of Slight Risk probs.I don’t know if it’s been posted but a snippet from the day 2.
“Some guidance indicates storm development ahead of the line across AL/TN/MS which would have a threat for all severe hazards given the steep mid-level lapse rates and strong low-level and deep-layer shear.”
I’m out of the loop today, so I don’t know what he’s referencing, but interesting nonetheless.