Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
A 4 is just as devastating as a 5 when you live there. Heck, a 1 can be if it kills your loved one or destroys your home. I’m not sure why people get so wrapped up in the ratings. It was an extremely violent tornado that left a community mourning.also again.... the weather community has kind of become toxic in a way, yes there's them jerks that just want a EF5 to happen and want destruction yes i agree that's kind of messed up .... but we also have the opposite, the whole (how dare you question NWS rating) crowed, your like not allowed to speculate about a EF rating apparently and also treat like the NWS can do no wrong (villonia and metador...) however i find this bad for science we cant get accurate if we can not debate and challenge each other, its sad to see everyone be so scared to call anything a EF4-EF5.
A 2 hit my home in 2020 it was a five to me.A 4 is just as devastating as a 5 when you live there. Heck, a 1 can be if it kills your loved one or destroys your home. I’m not sure why people get so wrapped up in the ratings. It was an extremely violent tornado that left a community mourning.
Matador receiving its own thread had a lot to do with the initial discussion being buried within the Severe Weather 2023 thread. If I recall correctly, there wasn't a specific event thread that included June 21st.I hard agree on this, matador got its own thread so I think this tornado is significant enough for it as well.
You recall correctly, however, as you can tell, hardly anyone is taking about today’s threat, it’s all about yesterday’s tornado.Matador receiving its own thread had a lot to do with the initial discussion being buried within the Severe Weather 2023 thread. If I recall correctly, there wasn't a specific event thread that included June 21st.
As @notsoencrypted already pointed out, it's a lot easier to remove today's date from this thread instead of moving all of the discussion regarding Greenfield into a completely separate thread. Again, @JBishopwx has already created a thread regarding today and tomorrow's severe weather threat.You recall correctly, however, as you can tell, hardly anyone is taking about today’s threat, it’s all about yesterday’s tornado.
I think it’s quite confusing to viewers thinking they are expecting a discussion about today but getting tornado rating discourse instead.
That could work, I guess it’ll be up to mods in what the decision will be.As @notsoencrypted already pointed out, it's a lot easier to remove today's date from this thread instead of moving all of the discussion regarding Greenfield into a completely separate thread. Again, @JBishopwx has already created a thread regarding today and tomorrow's severe weather threat.
And let me just say this....I also think that the estimated wind values on the current EF-scale are in fact too low.also again.... the weather community has kind of become toxic in a way, yes there's them jerks that just want a EF5 to happen and want destruction yes i agree that's kind of messed up .... but we also have the opposite, the whole (how dare you question NWS rating) crowed, your like not allowed to speculate about a EF rating apparently and also treat like the NWS can do no wrong (villonia and metador...) however i find this bad for science we cant get accurate if we can not debate and challenge each other, its sad to see everyone be so scared to call anything a EF4-EF5.
Yeah it seems numbers are slow to come Out.. in this case not goodAt least 4 dead in Greenfield per KCRG-TV9.
Yep it’s crazy. Thought of all that tooI just realized a really interesting coincidence.
The Greensburg EF5 ended what was at the time the longest F5/EF5 drought, the day after the anniversary of the previous F5/EF5, which was in Moore.
The Greenfield tornado occurred on the day after the anniversary of the previous F5/EF5, which was also in Moore.
Both of these towns have "Green" at the start of the name.