Oh goodness, as if we needed any more bad news. I fear the total death toll from this storm when it’s revealed.
Oh my god.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Oh goodness, as if we needed any more bad news. I fear the total death toll from this storm when it’s revealed.
Unbelievable.
oh .... does anyone one know if this is confirmed to be a chaser? if so what one?Oh my god.
The way this tornado looked just screamed violent. This tornado literally was walking (dead man walking) towards Greenfield. Horrifying stuff.Looking at all the evidence holistically, I reckon this is one of the most violent tornadoes in some time (personally think since Mayfield but of course everyone has a varying opinions on tornado intensity etc) and even a fairly strong EF5 candidate (Whether it receives an EF4/5 is for the most part irrelevant, was clearly violent. I trust the NWS will make an accurate rating given the constraints of the scale and either category could be justified).
Not only was structural damage extremely impressive, with multiple homes (some look to have had anchor bolts on social media) completely obliterated, but contextual damage was extremely impressive and perhaps more so than at first glance:
But what I find most unbelievable is that all that damage would have been done in an incredibly small time. The tornado itself was moving at 50-60mph ish, and the core was incredibly narrow based on images. The dwell time for the strongest winds must have been just a few seconds. Would be interesting to see some basic calculations on that, probably wouldn't bee too hard to figure it once the width comes in from the survey.
- Vehicle damage is approaching similar levels to past high end EF4/5 tornadoes, with cars either crumpled or completely stripped to the chassis
- Debris was granulated and quite heavily wind rowed (wind rowing is also maybe more severe than it actually looks given how the debris density of the funnel would have been so large given the number of structures and width of the tornado, likely resulting in the debris just being dumped in the long piles of debris rather than rowed extremely long distances)
- Hardwood trees debarked
And on top of that, radar recorded winds of 250-290mph pretty much at ground level. Unbelievably strong tornado. Absolutely awful what it did to Greenfield, and really hope it can recover as quickly as possible.
If you look at where the tornado exited the town in aerial shots, you can still see extreme windrowing for hundreds of yards, but the most shocking part is that nearly all of the debris in this section is tiny fragments of extremely granulated debris. This tornado was seriously incredible.Debris was granulated and quite heavily wind rowed (wind rowing is also maybe more severe than it actually looks given how the debris density of the funnel would have been so large given the number of structures and width of the tornado, likely resulting in the debris just being dumped in the long piles of debris rather than rowed extremely long distances)
Since the name hasn't been released, it's not confirmed. The article just says the folks who live there said it was a chaser. I don't doubt that it could be, but we'll have to wait for confirmation, which, if it is a chaser, may take a bit longer for them to get in contact with family/ emergency contacts.oh .... does anyone one know if this is confirmed to be a chaser? if so what one?
Ef3 damage of the bat.
I'd personally tend toward making a new thread so this one can discuss damage more clearly?Is there a new thread for today's activity, or are we still using this one?
Ef3 damage of the bat.
250-290 was recorded 144 ft above the ground. But I don't doubt, as I said before, that winds at ground level, easily exceeded 200 mph with the given wind speeds recorded at that height.Looking at all the evidence holistically, I reckon this is one of the most violent tornadoes in some time (personally think since Mayfield but of course everyone has a varying opinions on tornado intensity etc) and even a fairly strong EF5 candidate (Whether it receives an EF4/5 is for the most part irrelevant, was clearly violent. I trust the NWS will make an accurate rating given the constraints of the scale and either category could be justified).
Not only was structural damage extremely impressive, with multiple homes (some look to have had anchor bolts on social media) completely obliterated, but contextual damage was extremely impressive and perhaps more so than at first glance:
But what I find most unbelievable is that all that damage would have been done in an incredibly small time. The tornado itself was moving at 50-60mph ish, and the core was incredibly narrow based on images. The dwell time for the strongest winds must have been just a few seconds. Would be interesting to see some basic calculations on that, probably wouldn't bee too hard to figure it once the width comes in from the survey.
- Vehicle damage is approaching similar levels to past high end EF4/5 tornadoes, with cars either crumpled or completely stripped to the chassis
- Debris was granulated and quite heavily wind rowed (wind rowing is also maybe more severe than it actually looks given how the debris density of the funnel would have been so large given the number of structures and width of the tornado, likely resulting in the debris just being dumped in the long piles of debris rather than rowed extremely long distances)
- Hardwood trees debarked
And on top of that, radar recorded winds of 250-290mph pretty much at ground level. Unbelievably strong tornado. Absolutely awful what it did to Greenfield, and really hope it can recover as quickly as possible.
The way this tornado was looked just screamed violent. This tornado literally was walking (dead man walking) towards Greenfield. Horrifying stuff.
Wow, thanks for letting me know. Just another thing to go on the list of how violent this tornado was.Since the name hasn't been released, it's not confirmed. The article just says the folks who live there said it was a chaser. I don't doubt that it could be, but we'll have to wait for confirmation, which, if it is a chaser, may take a bit longer for them to get in contact with family/ emergency contacts.