TornadoFan
Member
- Messages
- 5,237
- Location
- Colorado
You know stuff's getting real when SPC forecasters start vaguetweetingThe fact that that the first words from an SPC forecaster is "Oh no" is downright terrifying to me.
“12k NAM initiating a sustained supercell in that EML environment when its parameterization is explicitly designed to not convect at all in the presence of dry mid-level air”
Well now I know why the nam does so poorly with dry lines and high EML environments, thank you very much Fred.
Wow.The fact that that the first words from an SPC forecaster is "Oh no" is downright terrifying to me.
I only share the playlist I made of this for ease of getting all the videos to you, but check out Rich Thompson's tornado forecasting series from several years back. In the model episode, he talks about the various parameterizations and biases of the non-CAM models. The whole series sheds a LOT of light on things.
From north Texas all the way up to southern Nebraska, supercells have the possibility of producing tornadoes.
Obviously though Oklahoma and southern Kansas are in the more dire straights. Would expect an expansion of the moderate risk and dare I say an upgrade to the forbidden pink.
View attachment 27710
What...View attachment 27713 View attachment 27714
00z 12k NAM is doing something similar again. It convects a long-track supercell through central Oklahoma whose pressure perturbation is strong enough for the model to depict a 993mb low in the mesocyclone at 12-kilometer model grid resolution. The signal for this is clear as day.
This was exactly my reaction.
As someone who used to live in the former East Germany, I have to askWould have been more fitting if I had been listening to Weird Al the moment I saw your tweet. Unfortunately not. I was earlier, but am listening to "Auferstanden aus Ruinen" at this moment...
There's our 45% risk confirmed.
Yeah I'm joking. They won't do it immediately if they do want to put out a 45% risk.Let the SPC issue the 30% 1st lol.