- Messages
- 630
- Location
- Columbus, OH
@Fred Gossage Simply put, does it mean the mesocyclone is so powerful it’s generating a broad-scale low on the model?
It's being modeled so strongly that it's being reflected in that low/large of a grid box resolution in that model. That's not a CAM. It doesn't have the ability to model storm features explicitly. It's still doing that, however.@Fred Gossage Simply put, does it mean the mesocyclone is so powerful it’s generating a broad-scale low on the model?
I'm no communist, but it got stuck in my head. Don't ask me why because I don't understand how my own mind works, lol.As someone who used to live in the former East Germany, I have to ask
Why
I know how that goes.I'm no communist, but it got stuck in my head. Don't ask me why because I don't understand how my own mind works, lol.
Wow, that’s unbelievable… all tomorrow needs is one line of storms, and from the sounds of it, multiple lines may be possible.It's being modeled so strongly that it's being reflected in that low/large of a grid box resolution in that model. That's not a CAM. It doesn't have the ability to model storm features explicitly. It's still doing that, however.
My god. This is... well, scary. Very very scary. I haven't been tracking weather until 2022 so I don't have any idea what kind of outbreak this is gonna entail.It's being modeled so strongly that it's being reflected in that low/large of a grid box resolution in that model. That's not a CAM. It doesn't have the ability to model storm features explicitly. It's still doing that, however.
Yeah, it does seem like it. That's what REALLY scares me.Wow, that’s unbelievable… all tomorrow needs is one line of storms, and from the sounds of it, multiple lines may be possible.
April 6. 2006 featured a 60 percent tornado ️ riskI agree. After this season settles down the SPC should retroactively apply an "Extreme Risk" to generational events like 03-04 Apr 74, 27 Apr 11 & any applicable outbreak that comes afterward.
I don't know why the SPC didn't assign a 60% on 27 Apr 11 over N AL. That definitely deserved it more than Apr '06. Maybe they got too busy, which is altogether possible given how bad that day was for so many.
I actually think that issuance Broyles did that day and how it didn't quite work out is probably why he only went 45% at 1630z on 4/27/11.April 6. 2006 featured a 60 percent tornado ️ risk
AgreeI actually think that issuance Broyles did that day and how it didn't quite work out is probably why he only went 45% at 1630z on 4/27/11.
I know. That was my point lol. But we've refocused on tomorrow now & that's more important. So let's stick with that.April 6. 2006 featured a 60 percent tornado ️ risk