- Admin
- #761
I’m sorry! I’m on my phone so everything looks small already. I’ll try to be more careful in the future.
It is no problem just trying to help everyone and keep the discussion flowing. . Be safe out there
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I’m sorry! I’m on my phone so everything looks small already. I’ll try to be more careful in the future.
It is worth noting, they have at least 1-2 possible longed lived cells.Something of note to keep an eye on, UH tracks on HRRR haven't really been intense over the past several runs. Obviously UH tracks aren't the only thing that indicates tornado potential, but it's something to keep note of.
ARW is a bit more intense however, but NSSL isn't much better than HRRR
A signal to keep note of through this event.
This is due to mixing in the low levels projected by the HRRR. Cloud breaks in the WS will result in mixing increasing, and this will cause the LLJ to include the SFC and consequently be weaker due to Friction.View attachment 17907
Low level shear really trended down. This is good news - if this actually verifies and shear isn't higher than depcited here. We will probably still get tornadoes with any discrete supercell, but hopefully weak ones (obviously none are preferred) N AL, MS and S TN still could be in for a shot of an EF2+ tornado though potentially.
NAM still going for widely much stronger shear. Hopefully all will be revealed when we get a few sounding launches
Presumably this is a bit of a feedback loop as well... a stronger LLJ would probably mean better moisture advection which would be offsetting the decreasing dps due to mixing. I remember Rich Thompson describing something similar in one of his workshops a few years back.This is due to mixing in the low levels projected by the HRRR. Cloud breaks in the WS will result in mixing increasing, and this will cause the LLJ to include the SFC and consequently be weaker due to Friction.
I wouldn't say that. we're still looking at a widespread event with several sigtors likely.Yeah, I wouldn’t be too excited for this setup as a chaser…but very enthusiastic as someone who is living under the risk that it isn’t looking too bad.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm kinda curious at to how accurate those are. With the higher lapse rates I'd almost feel as if it's a bit underdone. Not a 100% sure on how it calculates it. Just my thoughtsSomething of note to keep an eye on, UH tracks on HRRR haven't really been intense over the past several runs. Obviously UH tracks aren't the only thing that indicates tornado potential, but it's something to keep note of.
ARW is a bit more intense however, but NSSL isn't much better than HRRR
A signal to keep note of through this event.
From my experience they're generally a good signal for some type of limiting factor. Goes half and half though, a lot of higher end events of recent had decent UH signals though.I'm kinda curious at to how accurate those are. With the higher lapse rates I'd almost feel as if it's a bit underdone. Not a 100% sure on how it calculates it. Just my thoughts
72/65 just to your East in Caledonia.72/67 here just outside of Ackerman, west of Starkville.