• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER
  • April 2024 Weather Video of the Month
    Post your nominations now!
Logo 468x120
Messages
2,256
Reaction score
2,856
Location
Missouri
So I was contacted recently by someone who experienced the 6/8/53 Cygnet, OH F4+ and that kinda drew me back to that outbreak a bit. Among other things, I finally got the full series (as far as I know) of photos of the tornado taken near OH-235, which is just shortly after it demolished a home and killed five members of one family.

Kvg3C4L.jpg


ZtlKiHm.jpg


e9zITcZ.jpg


RqrBRMM.jpg


ek9NvjR.jpg


2XYWt1s.jpg


zKFAI7f.jpg


luXgASD.jpg


Aezvrq4.jpg
Horizontal vortices in the 2nd to last pic....wow.
Also, looks like this tornado was going through some sort of transition while this sequence of photos was taken. Pretty nifty.
 

locomusic01

Member
Messages
1,376
Reaction score
3,833
Location
Pennsylvania
Speaking of the '53 outbreak, found something interesting re: Worcester. A person was killed in the car closest to the water here. It was originally parked in Great Brook Valley - I'm not sure exactly where, but being conservative, that's at least 400 yards. Possibly up to a third of a mile.

DYLREhh.jpg


Great Brook Valley would be well off to the right from this perspective. There were also mangled vehicles found in the wooded area to the left, but I'm not sure yet if they were from the GBV area or Rt. 70 (which would still be 250-300+ yards).

VKSArjB.jpg


I also came across this, but tbh I have no idea what to make of it lol. This field is just east of Petersham, right around 5 miles after the tornado first touched down.

ZD9jBHF.jpg
 

locomusic01

Member
Messages
1,376
Reaction score
3,833
Location
Pennsylvania
Just realized I should've probably also included this one in the last post to add a little context. Great Brook Valley is obviously in the foreground and the pond is on the left. The grove of trees I referenced is just beyond that. You can see the silo just to the right of the pond, which makes for a handy reference point between photos.

The tornado's direction of travel through here would've been almost directly from bottom to top, with an eastward (leftward) wobble around the pond area.

0Ot9hYs.jpg
 
Messages
2,256
Reaction score
2,856
Location
Missouri
Just realized I should've probably also included this one in the last post to add a little context. Great Brook Valley is obviously in the foreground and the pond is on the left. The grove of trees I referenced is just beyond that. You can see the silo just to the right of the pond, which makes for a handy reference point between photos.

The tornado's direction of travel through here would've been almost directly from bottom to top, with an eastward (leftward) wobble around the pond area.

0Ot9hYs.jpg
That last pic....wow, the core of the storm is clearly visible (or paths of suction vortices). Also, looks like lots of extremely intense wind-rowing, probably the most violent tornadic damage in New England ever clearly photographed.
I forget; did the tornado touch down right on the waters of the reservoir or the areas around it?
 

locomusic01

Member
Messages
1,376
Reaction score
3,833
Location
Pennsylvania
That last pic....wow, the core of the storm is clearly visible (or paths of suction vortices). Also, looks like lots of extremely intense wind-rowing, probably the most violent tornadic damage in New England ever clearly photographed.
I forget; did the tornado touch down right on the waters of the reservoir or the areas around it?
Basically right along the shore on the northeastern tip of the reservoir. Here's my old map (which I badly need to update in a few places, but it should be pretty close overall):

WSse8ns.jpg


There may have been a break in the path where it narrows between Petersham and Barre, but I've yet to see anything definitive. May have also just briefly narrowed - the tornado fluctuated in size quite a bit more than this track shows, which is one of the things I need to fix. The section from roughly Holden to south of Shrewsbury is pretty accurate based on S&R maps from the time + aerial photos, but other parts were more varied.
 
Last edited:
Messages
1,091
Reaction score
858
Location
texas
Basically right along the shore on the northeastern tip of the reservoir. Here's my old map (which I badly need to update in a few places, but it should be pretty close overall):

gejXmRL.jpg


There may have been a break in the path where it narrows between Petersham and Barre, but I've yet to see anything definitive. May have also just briefly narrowed - the tornado fluctuated in size quite a bit more than this track shows, which is one of the things I need to fix. The section from roughly Holden to south of Shrewsbury is pretty accurate based on S&R maps from the time + aerial photos, but other parts were more varied.
thats a very weird track...
 

locomusic01

Member
Messages
1,376
Reaction score
3,833
Location
Pennsylvania
thats a very weird track...
Indeed it is lol. One of the things I need to fix is that I don't think the bit near Petersham actually wobbled as far north as is usually portrayed; I recently found this picture taken from Connor Pond, which is like a quarter-mile south of the current track. That wobble's probably been exaggerated for whatever reason. But yeah, still unusual, especially for a tornado that was traveling at a pretty decent speed.

q2aADrP.jpg


Edit: It was bothering me so I updated the map quick. Still needs some work, but should be better now.
 
Last edited:

locomusic01

Member
Messages
1,376
Reaction score
3,833
Location
Pennsylvania
Okay, last post so I don't completely hijack the thread lol. Certain black & white pictures can be really striking, but for me there's something about color images that just bring events to life and make them feel more real. So, I've been slowly working on colorizing some '53 outbreak photos, starting with Worcester. The first is one I already posted above; the second is looking across the highway from the edge of Great Brook Valley toward the area in the other photos. It's scaled way down from the original but you can still see some pretty clear debarking:

Q1c2rT6.jpg


oAIOiMM.jpg
 

MNTornadoGuy

Member
Messages
1,625
Reaction score
2,601
Location
Apple Valley, MN
Okay, last post so I don't completely hijack the thread lol. Certain black & white pictures can be really striking, but for me there's something about color images that just bring events to life and make them feel more real. So, I've been slowly working on colorizing some '53 outbreak photos, starting with Worcester. The first is one I already posted above; the second is looking across the highway from the edge of Great Brook Valley toward the area in the other photos. It's scaled way down from the original but you can still see some pretty clear debarking:

Q1c2rT6.jpg


oAIOiMM.jpg
I do wonder what tree damage Worcester produced while it was moving through heavily forested areas in the first half of its track.
 
Messages
2,256
Reaction score
2,856
Location
Missouri
There was at least one (perhaps several) disaster TV series that did a what-if scenario on this very possibility.

Well I'm not sure how reliable a TV show is for scenarios like this lol but it's a start I suppose:
I found a PDF awhile back of scenarios involving EF5 wedges going through areas like Dallas, Chicago, Houston or the Twin Cities during rush hour striking downtown and freeway corridors and there was some pretty horrific scenarios that were possible,
 

Sawmaster

Member
Messages
518
Reaction score
663
Location
Pickens SC
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
There was at least one (perhaps several) disaster TV series that did a what-if scenario on this very possibility.

I don't see it as a "What if?" but more like "When's it gonna happen?" :eek:

From my time working with EM, I know every major metro area has an 'armageddon' plan though I don't think it's ever fully reached across-the-board-all-agencies table-top exercise level except in places where the chances of that kind of disaster are high. The questions I asked on this were responded to by saying that you just can't plan for it because you don't know what resources you'll have left until after it happens. Even with everyone doing the bast possible the casualty rate will be huge due to the time it will take to implement an effective response. Armageddon :eek:
 

locomusic01

Member
Messages
1,376
Reaction score
3,833
Location
Pennsylvania
So I was contacted recently by someone who experienced the 6/8/53 Cygnet, OH F4+ and that kinda drew me back to that outbreak a bit. Among other things, I finally got the full series (as far as I know) of photos of the tornado taken near OH-235, which is just shortly after it demolished a home and killed five members of one family.

Kvg3C4L.jpg


ZtlKiHm.jpg


e9zITcZ.jpg


RqrBRMM.jpg


ek9NvjR.jpg


2XYWt1s.jpg


zKFAI7f.jpg


luXgASD.jpg


Aezvrq4.jpg
Whoops, forgot one. Same general area, but I'm not sure if it was from the same photographer:

nV2aUyF.jpg


Also, came across this story a while ago but forgot to post about it. This woman's name is Zelda Chaffee, and incredibly, she survived direct hits from both the Flint-Beecher and Hudsonville-Standale F5s (this photo's from Hudsonville):

HNlFoOe.jpg


She's one of a few people I've come across over the years who've been in multiple F5s. I'd love to do something on them someday but I'm not sure it'd be possible to find enough info/photos.
 

Oakhurst_Wx

Member
Messages
19
Reaction score
27
Location
Mars
I've been doing some research into the horrific Tupelo, MS event on April 5th, 1936 and have come across several interesting photographs of the damage it left behind on newspapers.com. From the images I've seen, it appears that the tornado gradually intensified as it moved through Tupelo, peaking in strength as it obliterated the Gum Pond subdivision at the northeastern end of town. My hypothesis is that because the Tupelo tornado picked up a ton of debris as it passed through the city, the gigantic mass of debris that encircled the vortex when it entered the Gum Pond area may have contributed additionally to the devastating effects that took place there. I also noticed that the damage intensity contour was not well-defined and was not perfectly straight either. It appeared to wobble out and then back in from time to time and had an obvious multiple-vortex structure to it. In addition, this tornado could not have struck at a worse time. It struck on a warm Sunday evening, where residents were either out on the town or entire families were at home spending time together and eating dinner. Every single structure in the path of the tornado probably had people inside of them, waiting to meet death.

Looking out towards the contour of F5 damage. The multiple-vortex nature of the tornado is very obvious in this image and the EF3+ damage contour appears to be erratic until it consolidates further down in the photograph. I would like to find this picture in HD because it's still pretty difficult to tell what's going on here, but nonetheless very impressive.

19360405TUPELO.jpg

One of several homes in downtown Tupelo that was leveled. The trees nearby have sustained some debarking.

19360405TUPELO2.jpg

Two more views of homes destroyed in Tupelo outside of Gum Pond.

19360405TUPELO6.jpg

19360405TUPELO4.jpg

This is perhaps the best image of the F5 damage that I have found so far. This was taken in the Gum Pond area and shows the mutilated remnants of that subdivision. The wipeout here is on another level of complete. In addition, you can see what appears to be a tree trunk that has been reduced to a stump, which has been completely debarked by debris. I would also like to find this image in higher-quality as it's still not easy to tell what is going on.

19360405TUPELO5.jpg

This image below was taken looking out towards Gum Pond, on the northern edge of the violent contour of damage. In addition to showing two homes that have been completely destroyed, we can see that the tree at left has been partially debarked, an obvious indicator of violent tornadic winds.

19360405TUPELO10.jpg

This is another image that, similar to the first one, looks down towards Gum Pond and the F5 damage swath. This image also makes the tornado's extremely sharp damage intensity gradient obvious, as the home at right appears to have sustained F0 damage while the one at right is leveled at likely F4 intensity.

19360405TUPELO11.png

This aerial offers a different perspective of the damage swath through Tupelo, which despite having terrible image quality is still very obvious.

19360405TUPELO12.png

The last image is an image taken by an aerial survey company not long after the Tupelo Tornado's passage. I don't know when it was taken, but I do know that it was taken by "Kargl Aerial Surveys, LTD." The tornado's swath is very obvious here, marked by the eerie lack of trees through the center of the city.

19360405TUPELOAERIAL.png

All in all, it's pretty clear that this was one of the single most violent tornadic events to occur in Mississippi prior to the modern era of tornado documentation, and why this event had such a staggering death toll.
 
Messages
2,256
Reaction score
2,856
Location
Missouri
I've been doing some research into the horrific Tupelo, MS event on April 5th, 1936 and have come across several interesting photographs of the damage it left behind on newspapers.com. From the images I've seen, it appears that the tornado gradually intensified as it moved through Tupelo, peaking in strength as it obliterated the Gum Pond subdivision at the northeastern end of town. My hypothesis is that because the Tupelo tornado picked up a ton of debris as it passed through the city, the gigantic mass of debris that encircled the vortex when it entered the Gum Pond area may have contributed additionally to the devastating effects that took place there. I also noticed that the damage intensity contour was not well-defined and was not perfectly straight either. It appeared to wobble out and then back in from time to time and had an obvious multiple-vortex structure to it. In addition, this tornado could not have struck at a worse time. It struck on a warm Sunday evening, where residents were either out on the town or entire families were at home spending time together and eating dinner. Every single structure in the path of the tornado probably had people inside of them, waiting to meet death.

Looking out towards the contour of F5 damage. The multiple-vortex nature of the tornado is very obvious in this image and the EF3+ damage contour appears to be erratic until it consolidates further down in the photograph. I would like to find this picture in HD because it's still pretty difficult to tell what's going on here, but nonetheless very impressive.

View attachment 16130

One of several homes in downtown Tupelo that was leveled. The trees nearby have sustained some debarking.

View attachment 16131

Two more views of homes destroyed in Tupelo outside of Gum Pond.

View attachment 16132

View attachment 16133

This is perhaps the best image of the F5 damage that I have found so far. This was taken in the Gum Pond area and shows the mutilated remnants of that subdivision. The wipeout here is on another level of complete. In addition, you can see what appears to be a tree trunk that has been reduced to a stump, which has been completely debarked by debris. I would also like to find this image in higher-quality as it's still not easy to tell what is going on.

View attachment 16134

This image below was taken looking out towards Gum Pond, on the northern edge of the violent contour of damage. In addition to showing two homes that have been completely destroyed, we can see that the tree at left has been partially debarked, an obvious indicator of violent tornadic winds.

View attachment 16135

This is another image that, similar to the first one, looks down towards Gum Pond and the F5 damage swath. This image also makes the tornado's extremely sharp damage intensity gradient obvious, as the home at right appears to have sustained F0 damage while the one at right is leveled at likely F4 intensity.

View attachment 16136

This aerial offers a different perspective of the damage swath through Tupelo, which despite having terrible image quality is still very obvious.

View attachment 16137

The last image is an image taken by an aerial survey company not long after the Tupelo Tornado's passage. I don't know when it was taken, but I do know that it was taken by "Kargl Aerial Surveys, LTD." The tornado's swath is very obvious here, marked by the eerie lack of trees through the center of the city.

View attachment 16138

All in all, it's pretty clear that this was one of the single most violent tornadic events to occur in Mississippi prior to the modern era of tornado documentation, and why this event had such a staggering death toll.
Yeah Tupelo is basically Smithville but after dark & going through a densely populated area packed with full capacity of people.


This article has numerous colorized photos where the granulation of debris is clear as can be:


 
Messages
681
Reaction score
1,036
Location
Oakland, Tennessee
The Campbellsville, Pennsylvania F3 of July 14, 2004.
campbelslvilel.png
The wiped out home on the right was a two story home. NWS State College stated that the homes were destroyed in "F4 fashion".

The tornado was rated mid-range F3.

La Plata Syndrome, everyone!
 

pohnpei

Member
Messages
967
Reaction score
1,976
Location
shanghai
I've been doing some research into the horrific Tupelo, MS event on April 5th, 1936 and have come across several interesting photographs of the damage it left behind on newspapers.com. From the images I've seen, it appears that the tornado gradually intensified as it moved through Tupelo, peaking in strength as it obliterated the Gum Pond subdivision at the northeastern end of town. My hypothesis is that because the Tupelo tornado picked up a ton of debris as it passed through the city, the gigantic mass of debris that encircled the vortex when it entered the Gum Pond area may have contributed additionally to the devastating effects that took place there. I also noticed that the damage intensity contour was not well-defined and was not perfectly straight either. It appeared to wobble out and then back in from time to time and had an obvious multiple-vortex structure to it. In addition, this tornado could not have struck at a worse time. It struck on a warm Sunday evening, where residents were either out on the town or entire families were at home spending time together and eating dinner. Every single structure in the path of the tornado probably had people inside of them, waiting to meet death.

Looking out towards the contour of F5 damage. The multiple-vortex nature of the tornado is very obvious in this image and the EF3+ damage contour appears to be erratic until it consolidates further down in the photograph. I would like to find this picture in HD because it's still pretty difficult to tell what's going on here, but nonetheless very impressive.

View attachment 16130

One of several homes in downtown Tupelo that was leveled. The trees nearby have sustained some debarking.

View attachment 16131

Two more views of homes destroyed in Tupelo outside of Gum Pond.

View attachment 16132

View attachment 16133

This is perhaps the best image of the F5 damage that I have found so far. This was taken in the Gum Pond area and shows the mutilated remnants of that subdivision. The wipeout here is on another level of complete. In addition, you can see what appears to be a tree trunk that has been reduced to a stump, which has been completely debarked by debris. I would also like to find this image in higher-quality as it's still not easy to tell what is going on.

View attachment 16134

This image below was taken looking out towards Gum Pond, on the northern edge of the violent contour of damage. In addition to showing two homes that have been completely destroyed, we can see that the tree at left has been partially debarked, an obvious indicator of violent tornadic winds.

View attachment 16135

This is another image that, similar to the first one, looks down towards Gum Pond and the F5 damage swath. This image also makes the tornado's extremely sharp damage intensity gradient obvious, as the home at right appears to have sustained F0 damage while the one at right is leveled at likely F4 intensity.

View attachment 16136

This aerial offers a different perspective of the damage swath through Tupelo, which despite having terrible image quality is still very obvious.

View attachment 16137

The last image is an image taken by an aerial survey company not long after the Tupelo Tornado's passage. I don't know when it was taken, but I do know that it was taken by "Kargl Aerial Surveys, LTD." The tornado's swath is very obvious here, marked by the eerie lack of trees through the center of the city.

View attachment 16138

All in all, it's pretty clear that this was one of the single most violent tornadic events to occur in Mississippi prior to the modern era of tornado documentation, and why this event had such a staggering death toll.
Comparison of six extremely wide and complex multi-vortex path through towns.
Tri state
E4LS7ILWUAg4AT8.jpeg
Tupelo
IMG_20221216_153657.jpg
woodward
19470409WOODWARD17.jpg
Wichita falls
IMG_8758.jpg
Greensburg
MV5BZDM2NTVlNzMtZWQzMS00NTQ3LWIxZmItYmY2MmVkYjZlNGZlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjIxNDA0NDQ@._V1_.jpg
Mayfield
Fjn6LocXoAANr-F.jpeg
 
Top