• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Severe Weather Threat 4/27-4/28

ONCERNING...TORNADO WATCH 162...

VALID 272058Z - 272230Z


THE SEVERE WEATHER THREAT FOR TORNADO WATCH 162 CONTINUES.

SUMMARY...MONITORING FOR SUPERCELL DEVELOPMENT AND THE POTENTIAL FOR
STRONG-INTENSE TORNADOES OVER THE NEXT COUPLE HOURS.

DISCUSSION...CONVECTION IS GRADUALLY INCREASING ACROSS FAR SOUTHERN
IL AND VICINITY, WHERE BOUNDARY-LAYER DEWPOINTS HAVE INCREASED TO
NEAR 70F -- RESULTING IN A STRONGLY UNSTABLE AIR MASS. ADDITIONALLY,
THE PAH VWP AND RECENT MESOANALYSIS DATA INDICATE A LARGE
CLOCKWISE-CURVED HODOGRAPH, WITH EFFECTIVE SRH INCREASING TO AROUND
300 M2/S2. THE STRONG BUOYANCY, ENHANCED LOW-LEVEL STREAMWISE
VORTICITY, AND EXPECTED DISCRETE STORM MODE WILL FAVOR AN INCREASING
RISK OF SUPERCELLS CAPABLE OF PRODUCING STRONG-INTENSE TORNADOES AND
VERY LARGE HAIL/DAMAGING WINDS OVER THE NEXT COUPLE HOURS.

..WEINMAN.. 04/27/2026
 
A bit off topic, but I just noticed a strange feature on the Springfield, MO radar.



Check out the center-right - there's a distinct linear shape moving east to west (the opposite direction of the weather)

It's persisted for 3 scans on both reflectivity and radar, and it's moving. No flights in the area.

Any guesses?
 
New tornado warning was just issued a couple minutes ago. Laddonia needs to be taking shelter right about now and Bowling Green should be prepared too.
Yaicfak.png
 
A bit off topic, but I just noticed a strange feature on the Springfield, MO radar.



Check out the center-right - there's a distinct linear shape moving east to west (the opposite direction of the weather)

It's persisted for 3 scans on both reflectivity and radar, and it's moving. No flights in the area.

Any guesses?

It's likely just an artifact of the radar bouncing off of a structure in Springfield, MO and then reflecting back and the radar interprets its as precipitation based on where it "thinks" the reflection came from. The KSGF radar has a relatively low beam angle (~0.176 degree) and with the radar west of the city, there is a decent chance of it hitting buildings or structures in the city.

edit: Here is a document that talks about different types of artifacts that can show up on radar.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top