David in SW Blount
Member
That is just unreal.
Awful. Reminds me of some of the towns hit by the Dec 10th 2021 tornado - that's really the only comparison I can make right now.
Ground scouring, debarking, granulation, wind rowing, bordering on extreme vehicle damage. Zero doubt in mine (and I think everyone's!) minds this was an extremely violent tornado.Yep - this was basically Mississippi's Mayfield, except the contextuals here might be more intense. I also saw at least one home in the video posted above that was slabbed.
There was ground scouring? That's almost a usual Ef5 sign; or very high end ef4Ground scouring, debarking, granulation, wind rowing, bordering on extreme vehicle damage. Zero doubt in mine (and I think everyone's!) minds this was an extremely violent tornado.
Not really. Ground scouring has been seen in quite a few tornadoes below E/F5 strength, and even some below EF4 strength. But it is still a hallmark of a powerful tornado.There was ground scouring? That's almost a usual Ef5 sign; or very high end ef4
That's not necessarily true.There was ground scouring? That's almost a usual Ef5 sign; or very high end ef4
Usually when I think of ground scouring I remember the Philadelphia Mississippi images, I usually associate it with high end ef4 or ef5 lolThat's not necessarily true.
Agreed. My tornado tracking experience is not that long - only really back in 2017 did I start checking SPC outlooks and checking radar, but the feeling of waking up this morning seeing that string of tornado reports, the violent radar signatures and the line of towns with reports of horrific damage is only comparable to Dec 10th 2021. Truly awful.Parroting what others have already said, but the contextual damage here may be even worse than Mayfield. I don't recall completely debarked trees in Mayfield. Either way, it's kinda splitting hairs at this point, as this was clearly a comparable event.
I actually would describe what that tornado did as trench digging.Usually when I think of ground scouring I remember the Philadelphia Mississippi images, I usually associate it with high end ef4 or ef5 lol
As in Mayfield, moreover, most of the structures impacted do not appear to have been particularly well built. In this case the quality of the larger structures might even be less than in Mayfield. Certainly the absence of large, well-built masonry in Rolling Fork attests to this, and I don’t see a candle-factory or Wrangler plant to compensate for this. While there were fewer debarked trees in Mayfield, most of the trees in this case were only partially debarked, based on initial footage. At 1:30 one can see that the water-tower does not appear to show indications of proper anchoring. Also, while the ground appears to be muddy, the contextual support for scouring does not appear to have been as clear-cut as in Mayfield. (Besides, in that case the deepest scouring actually occurred near Cayce and Bremen.) Structural damage alone actually does not appear to support much more than a low-end EF4 at this point, though contextual DIs arguably support a higher intensity than this. The tornado itself was probably capable of EF5 damage at some point, but perhaps not in Rolling Fork itself. The damage in Rolling Fork seems to mostly support a mid-range EF4 at this stage.Yep - this was basically Mississippi's Mayfield, except the contextuals here might be more intense. I also saw at least one home in the video posted above that was slabbed.
That's not a good reference to use for ground scouring. The significance depends on they type and degree of scouring. Now when all surface vegetation is removed along an even swath, leaving essentially leaving only bare soil behind, then it's more indicative of an extremely high-end event (think Bridge Creek or Moore). The deep plowing up of the earth has been documented in tornadoes of lesser intensity since Philadelphia, including an EF1 in Georgia last year, and a low-end EF3 in Louisiana.Usually when I think of ground scouring I remember the Philadelphia Mississippi images, I usually associate it with high end ef4 or ef5 lol
Good post didn't know that!That's not a good reference to use for ground scouring. The significance depends on they type and degree of scouring. Now when all surface vegetation is removed along an even swath, leaving essentially leaving only bare soil behind, then it's more indicative of an extremely high-end event (think Bridge Creek or Moore). The deep plowing up of the earth has been documented in tornadoes of lesser intensity since Philadelphia, including an EF1 in Georgia last year, and a low-end EF3 in Louisiana.
1.) You're drawing way too many conclusions without nearly enough information.As in Mayfield, moreover, most of the structures impacted do not appear to have been particularly well built. In this case the quality of the larger structures might even be less than in Mayfield. Certainly the absence of large, well-built masonry in Rolling Fork attests to this, and I don’t see a candle-factory or Wrangler plant to compensate for this. While there were fewer debarked trees in Mayfield, most of the trees in this case were only partially debarked, based on initial footage. At 1:30 one can see that the water-tower does not appear to show indications of proper anchoring. Also, while the ground appears to be muddy, the contextual support for scouring does not appear to have been as clear-cut as in Mayfield. (Besides, in that case the deepest scouring actually occurred near Cayce and Bremen.) Structural damage alone actually does not appear to support much more than a low-end EF4 at this point, though contextual DIs arguably support a higher intensity than this. The tornado itself was probably capable of EF5 damage at some point, but perhaps not in Rolling Fork itself. The damage in Rolling Fork seems to mostly support a mid-range EF4 at this stage.
I think it’s probably way too early for any speculation of this type.As in Mayfield, moreover, most of the structures impacted do not appear to have been particularly well built. In this case the quality of the larger structures might even be less than in Mayfield. Certainly the absence of large, well-built masonry in Rolling Fork attests to this, and I don’t see a candle-factory or Wrangler plant to compensate for this. While there were fewer debarked trees in Mayfield, most of the trees in this case were only partially debarked, based on initial footage. At 1:30 one can see that the water-tower does not appear to show indications of proper anchoring. Also, while the ground appears to be muddy, the contextual support for scouring does not appear to have been as clear-cut as in Mayfield. (Besides, in that case the deepest scouring actually occurred near Cayce and Bremen.) Structural damage alone actually does not appear to support much more than a low-end EF4 at this point, though contextual DIs arguably support a higher intensity than this. The tornado itself was probably capable of EF5 damage at some point, but perhaps not in Rolling Fork itself. The damage in Rolling Fork seems to mostly support a mid-range EF4 at this stage.