• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Svr Wx threat April 1-April 2 2024

I'm currently a 1st year meteorology student. Is there any reason as to why CSU has drastically different risk areas from the SPC?
It's merely because the analog-based algorithms used to determine those threat contours are dependent upon model data (updated twice per day), causing them to differ, sometimes drastically, from the overall geometry of SPC outlook areas.
 
Meanwhile the 12z RRFS has supercells moving through yours truly's backyard on Tuesday. To be honest, it does show my concern.
 

Attachments

  • RRFS-A Gulf Coast US Simulated Radar.gif
    RRFS-A Gulf Coast US Simulated Radar.gif
    3.2 MB · Views: 0
  • refcmp.us_se.png
    refcmp.us_se.png
    290.8 KB · Views: 0
Something rather ominous about having a potential significant severe event in the Ohio Valley on the day before the 50th anniversary of the 1974 Super Outbreak.
 
Something rather ominous about having a potential significant severe event in the Ohio Valley on the day before the 50th anniversary of the 1974 Super Outbreak.
I had the exact same thought. I’ll be curious to see how models pan out over the next 24 hours
 
while i suspect most of the threat on tuesday will occur east of cincinnati, it's certainly got my ears perked up
it would be nice if this doesn't age poorly. the environment in the cincinnati area is gradually growing more concerning and a shift of only a few hours could bring us firmly into play.
 
18z HRRR at 48 hours
18z RRFS at 51 hours
 

Attachments

  • RRFS-A Simulated Radar Simulated Radar 51.png
    RRFS-A Simulated Radar Simulated Radar 51.png
    662.5 KB · Views: 0
  • HRRR 3-km Simulated Radar Simulated Radar 48.png
    HRRR 3-km Simulated Radar Simulated Radar 48.png
    640.9 KB · Views: 0
I know it's the supercell printer, but that looks mean
Yeah and it might not be far off on that idea given that you'll have a warm front positioned in that general area.
 
O would you look at that.... Both the 18z GFS and NAM CWASP have a 75 contour right over Northeast MS and my house

O boy....
 

Attachments

  • CWASPgfs212F048.png
    CWASPgfs212F048.png
    257.9 KB · Views: 0
  • CWASPnam212F048.png
    CWASPnam212F048.png
    261.5 KB · Views: 0
Sounding from near Columbus, MS, ahead of a QLCS on Tuesday. Could certainly support a tornado threat.
hrrr_2024040100_044_33.97--88.41.png
 
Sounding from near Columbus, MS, ahead of a QLCS on Tuesday. Could certainly support a tornado threat.
View attachment 24563
That and based on other models I've seen today warrant either expansion of the Level 2 risk and/or upgrade to Level 3 (particularly Northeast MS into North AL)
 
06Z runs of CAMs show a concerning increase in the favorability of wind fields for tornadoes across AL and GA, with more curved hodos out ahead of convection. If that trend holds, could mean a more substantial tornado threat for the South.
Edit: Likewise, 03Z SREF guidance trended more favorable for tornadoes across Alabama and Georgia.
 
Back
Top