MNTornadoGuy
Member
Damage from the 1883 Rochester tornado likely the strongest tornado in MN history, only tied with the 1919 Fergus Falls tornado.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Damage from the 1883 Rochester tornado likely the strongest tornado in MN history, only tied with the 1919 Fergus Falls tornado.
Some of the descriptions of that tornado (which, unfortunately, are all we have to go on) are among the most impressive I've ever read. 'Course, whether they're all true and accurate or not is another matter, but still. Also pretty significant that one man who had previously seen the aftermath in Grinnell, IA in 1882 (itself an extremely intense F5) said the damage in the Philadelphia Church/Rockingham area was even worse. If I could go back and survey any historical tornado, that would honestly be somewhere on my list.
Oof, don't get me started on the Palm Sunday ratings. There are a ton of them that I find really questionable. Not the least of which being, how in the world is Sunnyside anything other than an absolute no-doubt F5? At least Grazulis got it right. There are several others that would definitely have warranted consideration, but Sunnyside is just egregious.
That tornado that hit La Paz, IN got smacked with an F3 rating when, based on some pictures, it probably was at least F4 (and possibly F5) at some points. It's a mystery as to why 2 tornadoes of this day got downgraded from F5 to F4.
The fact that none of the tornadoes in the Palm Sunday event are officially documented F5s while silly cases like Vicksburg '53, Belmond '66, Wheelersburg '68, Valley Mills '73, Spiro '76, and Broken Bow '82 are is just more proof of how inconsistent everything about that entire period pre-1985 is in terms of ratings (and why Grazulis is usually a better source for ratings).
That’s completely Utter Bull crap. An F1 does not produce near F4 damageView attachment 7264
Here is one of the worst under-ratings from the Palm Sunday Outbreak. It is officially given an F1 rating yet it did near-F4 damage.
There's a serious a candidate for the most underrated tornado of all time.That’s completely Utter Bull crap. An F1 does not produce near F4 damage
Pittsfield-Strongsville, Lebanon-Sheridan, Kokomo-Greentown and Coldwater Lake-Manitou Beach all have compelling cases as well, to varying degrees. Tbh we should probably just give Coldwater Lake an F5 purely on its monstrous appearance:
Yep. Probably up there vilonia and the other fourThere's a serious a candidate for the most underrated tornado of all time.
An FU rating? Lol I'd dig it.What was probably one of the most overrated tornadoes of all time is the 6/29/1961 Glendive MT “F4.” This is the only official F4 in MT history. In reality all that happened was a brief non-damaging touchdown in some empty farmfield. It should have been given an F0 or FU rating.
Yeah, I'm no expert or anything, but that rating may have been slightly off.View attachment 7264
Here is one of the worst under-ratings from the Palm Sunday Outbreak. It is officially given an F1 rating yet it did near-F4 damage.
I really wonder how this got an F1 rating.off.
I'm wondering if it was a typo and due to bureaucratic incompetence/oversight never got changed.I really wonder how this got an F1 rating.
I think it could be considered a Super Outbreak at a much smaller scale, similar to many historic Dixie outbreaks.This might be an unpopular opinion but I consider the 1965 Palm Sunday tornado outbreak was a Super Outbreak. The violence is nearly unprecedented in post-1950 history with the exception of the two Super Outbreaks of course.