OH-IOan
Member
- Messages
- 384
- Location
- Franklin County, Ohio
The tornado's path is wider as it began hitting things and flinging debris violently upwards, shooting things everywhere. I was TOLD the first photo was Franklin, and the other pics I've seen have it looking the same(I dont have them on me at the time).Is the first one not the Poplar Bluff tornado? I'm probably completely wrong, but that and the Poplar Bluff EF3 (first attachment) look nearly the same. From one other photo I've seen of the tornado on the Arkansas side (second picture attached) the tornado had an Andover 2022-reminiscent shape while strengthening, although EF4 intensity was reached further down in the path and it was noticeably wider, seen in the survey.
That's judging a tornado off it's visual appearance, including poor quality near horizon shots showing little, like on the left. The condensation funnel is often much narrower than the determined path width anyway and as emphasised by Roger Wakimoto, the relationship is not consistent.Well thinking about our environment on 3/14; wind damage being frequent doesn't remotely surprise me. It was supposed to be a wind-based risk area with the additional risk for intense tornadic activity; but that solution isnt fully what we saw, which there is reason for why. Mainly in the evolution of the jet streak, it ejected absurdly favorably and right on time; allowing for much much much more discrete development; but still remember the thermodynamic parameters existed for powerful winds above 80mph. Being a stout EML above the surface, which allowed for evaporative cooling, which leads to strong downdrafts; we still had those strong downdrafts with our cells, discrete or not!
So Franklin-Fifty Six's path might be "wobbly" or even somewhat diffuse for this reason; as strong RFD widened the tornado, reducing it's winds with conservation of angular momentum in mind, but still allowing for strong multi-vortex activity. We saw this last year on 5/26/24, with the Dawson Springs KY EF3; very wide, fast moving, long tracked, but did not produce any variety of particularly violent level damage. Based on what photos I have seen of Franklin-Fifty Six, it looks very similar in appearance to Dawson Springs 2024; very dark, wide, and almost a little diffuse looking. RFD/Strom interactions can deeply alter a tornadoes behavior and path, along with environmental parameters outside of just the storm-scale interactions.
Edit: Something I just thought of; look at the difference in appearance between Franklin-Fifty Six, and the Diaz EF4 from literally the same time! Notice how thin the Diaz tornado looks? Well the damage can be correlated to just that; being the angular momentum of a thin, vertically intense tornado; keeping in mind the Diaz tornado existed in the southern area of the outbreak, it's parent supercell had a less intense RFD, as the wind probs increased with northward extent.
First photo is Franklin-Fifty Six, the second is the Diaz tornado. You'll notice the difference instantly
The mechanism I noted is known to exist. Like that has been observed; I did later note how it's NOT the only way these things can happen. All we can do is shoot spitballs here; we cant X-Ray tornadoes, at least not to the detail we need. I never said anything was certain, just theories. Plus in my first sentence I did note the correlation Wakimoto said; being the large amount of debris being sprayed (which is why you often see tornadoes become wider when they hit structures, they start flinging things).That's judging a tornado off it's visual appearance, including poor quality near horizon shots showing little, like on the left. The condensation funnel is often much narrower than the determined path width anyway and as emphasised by Roger Wakimoto, the relationship is not consistent.
The Franklin tornado's path both in DAT (EF-1 contour) and on Sentinel is quite wide when it was most intense and that doesn't change significantly when it becomes too weak to see on the April 7/8 satellite image, though there are some DIs placed well outside it. If the mechanism you propose exists, it's doubtful it would apply here.
The Dawson Springs tornado doesn't support your idea. A ground marking's visible soon after the track starts to west of White Sulphur, and after becoming indistinct for a couple of miles clear tree damage starts east of White Sulphur and becomes increasingly intense as the tornado widened, remaining obvious right until the path end.
-Anchor bolted home swept awayI know I'm flooding the thread with Palm Sunday (sorry), but here's some more stuff from the "F1" in Monroe, WI:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And from the Watertown, WI "F2" as well:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Again, I'm far from an expert, but I feel fairly confident in saying the official ratings for Palm Sunday are.. not great.
Even more amusing and/or baffling when you remember a certain "F5" that happened a year and a half later:-Anchor bolted home swept away
-F1
Yikes
I really want to know exactly who was responsible for assigning the ratings for this outbreak. It's literally like John Robinson and his cronies went back in time and rated that outbreak and ONLY that outbreak.
While we're on the topic of egregiously underrated tornadoes, here are some others that popped into my head:
Insane damage from the June 2, 1952 Buck Grove, IA "F2"
Well-built home swept away by the June 7, 1990 Emporia, KS "F2"
![]()
Tree damage from the June 15, 2019 Freedom, IN "EF1"
![]()
Tree damage from the March 24, 2020 Tishomingo, MS "EF1"
![]()
Oh, last thing for now. I cobbled together the individual aerial photos of the Ruskin Heights path that are available to make a mosaic. It's way too big to post directly so I uploaded it to Google Drive if anyone wants it:
It covers from the KS/MO border (~2mi SW of Martin City) to the end of the path in the very top right corner.
Eh, I actually agree with the F2 rating for Watertown.I know I'm flooding the thread with Palm Sunday (sorry), but here's some more stuff from the "F1" in Monroe, WI:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And from the Watertown, WI "F2" as well:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Again, I'm far from an expert, but I feel fairly confident in saying the official ratings for Palm Sunday are.. not great.
Watertown was rated F3.....I thinkEh, I actually agree with the F2 rating for Watertown.
Looking at the house in these photos, even in low quality I can tell it was built like sh$t. Notice the roof on the third photo, its practically in one piece upside down right next to the property.
That thing flew off with no effort at all, likely only took 70knot winds to do that.
Regarding the house itself, it’s clear it was constructed out of hollow cinder blocks, which at that point you might as well have built a house out of matchsticks.
Once that sorry excuse of a roof flipped off the walls fell down like a stack of cards.
Also notice the lack of any significant contextuals, none of the cinder blocks broke apart and even most of the wooden debris (mainly the 2by4s) are still intact.
Now that “F1” rated tornado is a whole other story.
No idea on imagery, but here's a photo of the tornado:Any imagery from Loyal Valley 1999? I've heard some incredible things that I'm admittedly a little skeptical of (such as a foundation apparently being "gone"), but I haven't seen any imagery of the damage from it. From what I have heard it sounds like one of those super slow-moving Plains grinders.