• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER
  • April 2024 Weather Video of the Month
    Post your nominations now!

locomusic01

Member
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
3,839
Location
Pennsylvania
Was that F5 ever official or was it just third party sources rating it F5?
Dunno if it was ever, like, officially official but Fujita referred to it as an F5 in multiple papers and it was listed as such in the 1999 NCDC technical report (albeit as a "questionable F5" or some such). Anyway, from what I've seen/read, I'm not so sure the first F4 wasn't actually the stronger of the two.

On a related note, I'd like to try and find some more photos from the South Hill F3 someday. Apparently near the beginning of the path (south of Rochester) it "completely demolished" a large brick veneer home and scattered it for miles, then it swept away at least two other homes somewhere around South Hill. Sounds fairly significant for an F3.
 
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
2,861
Location
Missouri
TornadoTalk researchers are traveling this week to Alabama to do research for a series of articles on the 1974 Super Outbreak, I eagerly await what they uncover on Guin as it is so poorly documented.

Also, Grazulis' updated SIGNIFICANT TORNADOES is coming out soon (at least the second part). Order form links will be activated on August 23, 2023 on his website. Link below:

 

TH2002

Member
Sustaining Member
Messages
3,490
Reaction score
5,618
Location
California, United States
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
I hate to clog up this thread with nothing but Vilonia stuff, but I found yet more fantastic surveying I couldn't help but share:

South of the Parkwood Meadows subdivision, the tornado left a classic example of a multiple-vortex structure and a sharp contour between violent and much weaker damage. A mobile home park along Naylor Rd was hit at no more than low-end EF2 intensity, where several mobile homes sustained roof damage, with one or two destroyed. To the immediate left and right of the mobile home park, a house and storage facility were left virtually untouched, but less than 300 feet down the road from the untouched house, a brick home was completely slabbed.

I also noticed some EF1 damage points along Williams Lake northeast of Parkwood Meadows, so I checked it out on satellite imagery and also found this aerial photo. Surely a classic example of EF1 damage...
web1_tornadoes-foundation_0.jpg


The survey, unsurprisingly, makes absolutely no mention of this home, and only mentions EF1-EF2 damage along the lake shore (there was also a destroyed metal barn rated EF3 about a quarter mile southwest of the lake, but that's it). It's almost as if the survey team went out of their way to NOT survey slabbed homes, and I'm being completely serious - I honestly don't see how else LZK could have skipped over so many of them.

Here's a rough count of damage points that were skipped (and keep in mind this only includes potential EF2-EF5 damage) along this portion of the track:

Williams Lake: At least one slabbed house skipped
Williams Rd: Three houses (one slabbed) and one mobile home skipped
Parkwood Meadows: 53 houses given blanket rating
E Wicker Street: Three leveled/slabbed houses skipped
N Church Street: Two homes and two manufactured homes skipped
Oak Street: Four houses skipped, two leveled (likely of questionable construction, but still)
N Elizabeth Street: Two slabbed houses skipped
Main St: Many structures skipped including slabbed Fish Hooks restaurant, lost count tbh
Cemetery St: At least twelve houses skipped, many leveled or slabbed
Marshell Rd: Slabbed house given EF4/170, no further elaboration or attachments
Coker Rd: Two slabbed houses skipped, including one that was apparently well-built with proper anchor bolts, and another where a fatality occurred
Hauser Ln: Seven houses skipped, some mobile/manufactured homes, at least one on slab
Rocky Point Rd: Seven houses given blanket EF3/150 rating, including at least five slabbed
Cody Ln: Nine houses given blanket EF4/170 rating, no photo attachments
Autumnbrook Ln: Survey only mentions EF2 damage to mobile homes, three leveled/slabbed houses skipped
Ponderosa Dr/Willow Springs Rd: Multiple manufactured homes skipped
Stacy Cove: Survey only mentions EF2 damage to mobile homes, one slabbed house skipped
Brown Dr: Survey only mentions EF2 damage to homes, leveled house skipped
Tower Rd: Two slabbed and one leveled house given blanket EF3/150 rating

That's all I got because the satellite imagery ends there, but even excluding blanket ratings and manufactured homes, that leaves us with at least
40 homes completely left out of the survey
480-4809425_oh-god-why-meme-png-download-oh-god.png
 
Last edited:

Marshal79344

Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
1,066
Location
Chicago, IL
I hate to clog up this thread with nothing but Vilonia stuff, but I found yet more fantastic surveying I couldn't help but share:

South of the Parkwood Meadows subdivision, the tornado left a classic example of a multiple-vortex structure and a sharp contour between violent and much weaker damage. A mobile home park along Naylor Rd was hit at no more than low-end EF2 intensity, where several mobile homes sustained roof damage, with one or two destroyed. To the immediate left and right of the mobile home park, a house and storage facility were left virtually untouched, but less than 300 feet down the road from the untouched house, a brick home was completely slabbed.

I also noticed some EF1 damage points along Williams Lake northeast of Parkwood Meadows, so I checked it out on satellite imagery and also found this aerial photo. Surely a classic example of EF1 damage...
web1_tornadoes-foundation_0.jpg


The survey, unsurprisingly, makes absolutely no mention of this home, and only mentions EF1-EF2 damage along the lake shore (there was also a destroyed metal barn rated EF3 about a quarter mile southwest of the lake, but that's it). It's almost as if the survey team went out of their way to NOT survey slabbed homes, and I'm being completely serious - I honestly don't see how else LZK could have skipped over so many of them.

Here's a rough count of damage points that were skipped (and keep in mind this only includes potential EF2-EF5 damage) along this portion of the track:

Williams Lake: At least one slabbed house skipped
Williams Rd: Three houses (one slabbed) and one mobile home skipped
Parkwood Meadows: 53 houses given blanket rating
E Wicker Street: Three leveled/slabbed houses skipped
N Church Street: Two homes and two manufactured homes skipped
Oak Street: Four houses skipped, two leveled (likely of questionable construction, but still)
N Elizabeth Street: Two slabbed houses skipped
Main St: Many structures skipped including slabbed Fish Hooks restaurant, lost count tbh
Cemetery St: At least twelve houses skipped, many leveled or slabbed
Marshell Rd: Slabbed house given EF4/170, no further elaboration or attachments
Coker Rd: Two slabbed houses skipped, including one that was apparently well-built with proper anchor bolts, and another where a fatality occurred
Hauser Ln: Seven houses skipped, some mobile/manufactured homes, at least one on slab
Rocky Point Rd: Seven houses given blanket EF3/150 rating, including at least five slabbed
Cody Ln: Nine houses given blanket EF4/170 rating, no photo attachments
Autumnbrook Ln: Survey only mentions EF2 damage to mobile homes, three leveled/slabbed houses skipped
Ponderosa Dr/Willow Springs Rd: Multiple manufactured homes skipped
Stacy Cove: Survey only mentions EF2 damage to mobile homes, one slabbed house skipped
Brown Dr: Survey only mentions EF2 damage to homes, leveled house skipped
Tower Rd: Two slabbed and one leveled house given blanket EF3/150 rating

That's all I got because the satellite imagery ends there, but even excluding blanket ratings and manufactured homes, that leaves us with at least
40 homes completely left out of the survey
480-4809425_oh-god-why-meme-png-download-oh-god.png
One hill that I will die on for the rest of eternity and one thing that no explanation from any meteorologist can change will be the fact that Vilonia should have been an EF5 and definitely deserved that rating.

20140427VILONIA3.jpg
20140427VILONIA9.jpg
20140427VILONIA11.jpg
20140427VILONIA22.jpg
20140427VILONIA25.jpg
20140427VILONIA33.jpg
20140427VILONIA23.jpg
20140427VILONIA32.jpg20140427VILONIA60.jpg

Not one other tornado that has been documented in Arkansas has done damage even remotely on the same level that this tornado did. It's an utter and total shame that the one obvious F5/EF5-worthy tornado that occurred in Arkansas in the past 70 years was robbed of its rating.
 

TH2002

Member
Sustaining Member
Messages
3,490
Reaction score
5,618
Location
California, United States
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
One hill that I will die on for the rest of eternity and one thing that no explanation from any meteorologist can change will be the fact that Vilonia should have been an EF5 and definitely deserved that rating.

View attachment 21288
View attachment 21289
View attachment 21290
View attachment 21291
View attachment 21292
View attachment 21293
View attachment 21294
View attachment 21296View attachment 21295

Not one other tornado that has been documented in Arkansas has done damage even remotely on the same level that this tornado did. It's an utter and total shame that the one obvious F5/EF5-worthy tornado that occurred in Arkansas in the past 70 years was robbed of its rating.
Also can't get over how Grazulis backed out of the opportunity he had to rate Vilonia EF5, with little explanation beyond 'the path [in Vilonia] looked to be narrowing'. Trying to understand what he would have had to lose by rating it as such...

On the bright side, I did come across a research paper somewhat recently that did indeed rate Vilonia (along with Chickasha and Goldsby) as EF5. With that, and the fact that some seasoned meteorologists have straight up said it should have been rated EF5, we can at the very least say the opinion "Vilonia was an EF5" isn't only held by so-called "weather weenies".
 

UK_EF4

Member
Messages
573
Reaction score
1,329
Location
NW London
Also can't get over how Grazulis backed out of the opportunity he had to rate Vilonia EF5, with little explanation beyond 'the path [in Vilonia] looked to be narrowing'. Trying to understand what he would have had to lose by rating it as such...

On the bright side, I did come across a research paper somewhat recently that did indeed rate Vilonia (along with Chickasha and Goldsby) as EF5. With that, and the fact that some seasoned meteorologists have straight up said it should have been rated EF5, we can at the very least say the opinion "Vilonia was an EF5" isn't only held by so-called "weather weenies".
That paper sounds very interesting. Do you know where I could find a copy to read/download?
 
Messages
539
Reaction score
478
Location
Northern Europe
Not one other tornado that has been documented in Arkansas has done damage even remotely on the same level that this tornado did.
@Marshal79344 To be fair, the mere fact that other E/F5s in Arkansas have been undocumented does not disprove their existence. There were once some very impressive images of the Clinton–Zion EF4 from Super Tuesday 2008 that showed extreme damage to hardwoods and vehicles. Re: the latter: at one point there was an image that revealed only some chassis left (whether of a trailer or vehicle could not be determined). Hardwoods in the southern Ozark region are notoriously sturdy, yet the Clinton–Zion EF4 snapped off many mature specimens. Unfortunately, I cannot locate these images at this time, for I cannot recall the link, but the image of the boat-factory is well known. There were also several slabbed structures along the path that may have been ignored. Also, some of the images from the outbreak of 21 Mar 1952 suggest that two or three tornadoes could have been capable of E/F5 damage in either Arkansas (especially Dierks) or neighbouring states (Cooter MO and/or Bolivar–Henderson TN).
 

Marshal79344

Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
1,066
Location
Chicago, IL
@Marshal79344 To be fair, the mere fact that other E/F5s in Arkansas have been undocumented does not disprove their existence. There were once some very impressive images of the Clinton–Zion EF4 from Super Tuesday 2008 that showed extreme damage to hardwoods and vehicles. Re: the latter: at one point there was an image that revealed only some chassis left (whether of a trailer or vehicle could not be determined). Hardwoods in the southern Ozark region are notoriously sturdy, yet the Clinton–Zion EF4 snapped off many mature specimens. Unfortunately, I cannot locate these images at this time, for I cannot recall the link, but the image of the boat-factory is well known. There were also several slabbed structures along the path that may have been ignored. Also, some of the images from the outbreak of 21 Mar 1952 suggest that two or three tornadoes could have been capable of E/F5 damage in either Arkansas (especially Dierks) or neighbouring states (Cooter MO and/or Bolivar–Henderson TN).
I agree with the fact that Clinton was capable of EF5 damage, but Clinton did not hit any structures that could have warranted such a rating. Vilonia, on the other hand, hit and totally swept away multiple homes that could have easily warranted EF5 intensity. When I said 70 years, I was talking about the Dierks, Arkansas tornado as being the last solid case for an F5 rating in Arkansas history.
 
Messages
2,924
Reaction score
4,855
Location
Madison, WI
Not exactly a "significant" tornado event in the scheme of things but personally significant since I consider this my "official" first tornado as a chaser (beyond a brief glimpse, rain-wrapped, etc), two years ago today. Rated EF1, this tornado tracked for 2.2 miles over about 3 1/2 minutes just south of Kirkland, Illinois. My view was about 3.5 miles to the south from the unincorporated community of Clare.

The storm appeared to cycle, producing another wall cloud, but it quickly became buried in low-contrast rain and I mistakenly left the area, thinking the show was over. Another cell followed almost the same path about 45 minutes later, producing a couple of longer-lived and more photogenic (but still relatively weak, none higher than EF1) tornadoes near Esmond, Creston and Sycamore. This was a small-supercell, summer MCV tornado event; this year's July 12th event played out in almost identical fashion, only concentrated just slightly further east. The similarities between the setups are part of what convinced me to stick with the storm on 7/12 despite it looking like crap for so long.

Wall cloud N. of Rochelle, IL 8/9/2021 by Andy, on Flickr

Wall cloud/developing tornado N. of Clare, IL 8/9/2021 2 by Andy, on Flickr

EF1 Tornado, S. of Kirkland (or N. of Clare), IL 8/9/2021 2 by Andy, on Flickr

EF1 Tornado, S. of Kirkland (or N. of Clare), IL 8/9/2021 3 by Andy, on Flickr

EF1 Tornado, S. of Kirkland (or N. of Clare), IL 8/9/2021 4 by Andy, on Flickr

Kirkland tornado and new wall cloud, 8/9/2021 by Andy, on Flickr

Wall Cloud, N. of Clare, IL 8/9/2021 by Andy, on Flickr

Before this tornado, I also technically saw the brief (one-minute) EF0 produced by the same storm earlier near Esmond, but that falls into the "brief glimpse" category and only captured as a distant, white rope funnel by my phone mounted on the dash.

 
Last edited:
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
2,861
Location
Missouri
Also can't get over how Grazulis backed out of the opportunity he had to rate Vilonia EF5, with little explanation beyond 'the path [in Vilonia] looked to be narrowing'. Trying to understand what he would have had to lose by rating it as such...

On the bright side, I did come across a research paper somewhat recently that did indeed rate Vilonia (along with Chickasha and Goldsby) as EF5. With that, and the fact that some seasoned meteorologists have straight up said it should have been rated EF5, we can at the very least say the opinion "Vilonia was an EF5" isn't only held by so-called "weather weenies".
Where's this paper? At least someone is on the right track.
Also, this person should've included Chapman as an EF5 too.
 

TH2002

Member
Sustaining Member
Messages
3,490
Reaction score
5,618
Location
California, United States
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
That paper sounds very interesting. Do you know where I could find a copy to read/download?
Where's this paper? At least someone is on the right track.
Also, this person should've included Chapman as an EF5 too.
"Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction" is the paper. Unfortunately most of it seems to be locked behind a paywall (of course), but here is the page in question:
 
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
2,861
Location
Missouri
"Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction" is the paper. Unfortunately most of it seems to be locked behind a paywall (of course), but here is the page in question:

Found a FREE pdf of it online, tried to upload it here but it won't work. I can try & PM it to you.
 

TH2002

Member
Sustaining Member
Messages
3,490
Reaction score
5,618
Location
California, United States
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
I agree with the fact that Clinton was capable of EF5 damage, but Clinton did not hit any structures that could have warranted such a rating. Vilonia, on the other hand, hit and totally swept away multiple homes that could have easily warranted EF5 intensity. When I said 70 years, I was talking about the Dierks, Arkansas tornado as being the last solid case for an F5 rating in Arkansas history.
I find the February 5, 2008 long-tracker to have been a likely candidate for an EF5 rating. Not as clear-cut as Vilonia, but still an extremely violent tornado. The first photo is where a well-anchored house was swept off its foundation:
longtrackdamage8.jpg

080206-tonado-hmed-7a.jpg

img_20220106_132402-jpg.11523

img_20220106_122748-jpg.11504
dcb617b91cb092-jpg.11517
 

andyhb

Member
Meteorologist
Messages
1,226
Reaction score
3,607
Location
Norman, OK
I hate to clog up this thread with nothing but Vilonia stuff, but I found yet more fantastic surveying I couldn't help but share:

South of the Parkwood Meadows subdivision, the tornado left a classic example of a multiple-vortex structure and a sharp contour between violent and much weaker damage. A mobile home park along Naylor Rd was hit at no more than low-end EF2 intensity, where several mobile homes sustained roof damage, with one or two destroyed. To the immediate left and right of the mobile home park, a house and storage facility were left virtually untouched, but less than 300 feet down the road from the untouched house, a brick home was completely slabbed.

I also noticed some EF1 damage points along Williams Lake northeast of Parkwood Meadows, so I checked it out on satellite imagery and also found this aerial photo. Surely a classic example of EF1 damage...
web1_tornadoes-foundation_0.jpg


The survey, unsurprisingly, makes absolutely no mention of this home, and only mentions EF1-EF2 damage along the lake shore (there was also a destroyed metal barn rated EF3 about a quarter mile southwest of the lake, but that's it). It's almost as if the survey team went out of their way to NOT survey slabbed homes, and I'm being completely serious - I honestly don't see how else LZK could have skipped over so many of them.

Here's a rough count of damage points that were skipped (and keep in mind this only includes potential EF2-EF5 damage) along this portion of the track:

Williams Lake: At least one slabbed house skipped
Williams Rd: Three houses (one slabbed) and one mobile home skipped
Parkwood Meadows: 53 houses given blanket rating
E Wicker Street: Three leveled/slabbed houses skipped
N Church Street: Two homes and two manufactured homes skipped
Oak Street: Four houses skipped, two leveled (likely of questionable construction, but still)
N Elizabeth Street: Two slabbed houses skipped
Main St: Many structures skipped including slabbed Fish Hooks restaurant, lost count tbh
Cemetery St: At least twelve houses skipped, many leveled or slabbed
Marshell Rd: Slabbed house given EF4/170, no further elaboration or attachments
Coker Rd: Two slabbed houses skipped, including one that was apparently well-built with proper anchor bolts, and another where a fatality occurred
Hauser Ln: Seven houses skipped, some mobile/manufactured homes, at least one on slab
Rocky Point Rd: Seven houses given blanket EF3/150 rating, including at least five slabbed
Cody Ln: Nine houses given blanket EF4/170 rating, no photo attachments
Autumnbrook Ln: Survey only mentions EF2 damage to mobile homes, three leveled/slabbed houses skipped
Ponderosa Dr/Willow Springs Rd: Multiple manufactured homes skipped
Stacy Cove: Survey only mentions EF2 damage to mobile homes, one slabbed house skipped
Brown Dr: Survey only mentions EF2 damage to homes, leveled house skipped
Tower Rd: Two slabbed and one leveled house given blanket EF3/150 rating

That's all I got because the satellite imagery ends there, but even excluding blanket ratings and manufactured homes, that leaves us with at least
40 homes completely left out of the survey
480-4809425_oh-god-why-meme-png-download-oh-god.png
If they had actually surveyed all (or even some) of these areas, it likely negates all of the dumb nitpicking with the Wicker Street homes.
 
Messages
539
Reaction score
478
Location
Northern Europe
I find the February 5, 2008 long-tracker to have been a likely candidate for an EF5 rating. Not as clear-cut as Vilonia, but still an extremely violent tornado. The first photo is where a well-anchored house was swept off its foundation:
@TH2002

Honestly, that vehicular damage, especially in the third image, is on a par with that of the top-tier events in this thread. It is very reminiscent of Bridge Creek, in fact. Also, the fact that this tornado reduced mature Ozark hardwoods to debarked stubs, as can be seen in the second image, is extremely noteworthy. The hardwoods in this part of the country are, as mentioned, almost notoriously sturdy. This kind of tree damage is equivalent to that which San Justo, Loyal Valley, Matador, et al. have done. Also, high-end granulation of debris is very evident, along with possible, locally deep (?) ground scouring. Furthermore, the fact that radar-indicated velocities, if I recall correctly, apparently peaked over unsettled terrain points further to the extreme intensity of this tornado.

I also located the following image of the boat-factory in Clinton. Apparently the tornado dislodged several parking slabs in the foreground, each of which was apparently anchored (a bolt can be seen in the lower centre-right, if I am not mistaken). The contextual damage in and around this facility certain seems to have been very high-end in nature, up to and including notable ground scouring and debarking of small pine-limbs. This kind of industrial damage is not exactly on a par with Barrie, Wheatland, Hackleburg, et al., but it is certainly violent in nature. This image shows more astounding damage to trees; an entire grove of mature hardwoods was literally reduced to mulch. Unfortunately, I cannot find the image of the chassis that I am seeking, though there is this image showing a trailer-frame.

Does anyone have the image that shows the chassis? If I recall correctly the chassis was wrapped around something. The preceding image does depict chassis, but if I recall correctly there was another image that showed even more extreme damage.
 

TH2002

Member
Sustaining Member
Messages
3,490
Reaction score
5,618
Location
California, United States
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
@TH2002

Honestly, that vehicular damage, especially in the third image, is on a par with that of the top-tier events in this thread. It is very reminiscent of Bridge Creek, in fact. Also, the fact that this tornado reduced mature Ozark hardwoods to debarked stubs, as can be seen in the second image, is extremely noteworthy. The hardwoods in this part of the country are, as mentioned, almost notoriously sturdy. This kind of tree damage is equivalent to that which San Justo, Loyal Valley, Matador, et al. have done. Also, high-end granulation of debris is very evident, along with possible, locally deep (?) ground scouring. Furthermore, the fact that radar-indicated velocities, if I recall correctly, apparently peaked over unsettled terrain points further to the extreme intensity of this tornado.

I also located the following image of the boat-factory in Clinton. Apparently the tornado dislodged several parking slabs in the foreground, each of which was apparently anchored (a bolt can be seen in the lower centre-right, if I am not mistaken). The contextual damage in and around this facility certain seems to have been very high-end in nature, up to and including notable ground scouring and debarking of small pine-limbs. This kind of industrial damage is not exactly on a par with Barrie, Wheatland, Hackleburg, et al., but it is certainly violent in nature. This image shows more astounding damage to trees; an entire grove of mature hardwoods was literally reduced to mulch. Unfortunately, I cannot find the image of the chassis that I am seeking, though there is this image showing a trailer-frame.

Does anyone have the image that shows the chassis? If I recall correctly the chassis was wrapped around something. The preceding image does depict chassis, but if I recall correctly there was another image that showed even more extreme damage.
Regarding the bolded points in order:

I'm not sure there's enough evidence to conclude the tornado itself was responsible for dislodging those parking stops, though it is certainly possible.

About the trees 'reduced to mulch', are you referring to those in the background of the first image, or the foreground of the second image?

I'm not aware that any such photo exists from this tornado of a mangled vehicle chassis other than the one I posted.

With that said, here's another photo of the well-anchored house near Mountain View. While I'll admit I'm not quite sure the debris patterns are EF5-consistent, all the other contextual damage was high-end. Remarkably, a family of six survived inside this home, albeit with injuries:
 

Marshal79344

Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
1,066
Location
Chicago, IL
So here's a random one - April 27, 1971. One F4 near Columbia, KY and another shortly after near Russell Springs and Gosser Ridge. The latter tornado was rated F5 in a few different sources but has since been downgraded to F4 (probably appropriately IMO).

Turns out I didn't label most of my photos for some reason so I'm actually not sure which ones are which. I know the first two here are from the Gosser Ridge tornado:

wPCbimc.jpg


M26dbzh.png


And I know these are from the Columbia F4 (specifically a property where a husband and wife and their neighbor were killed):

Ki1RxRl.jpg


jlIFObw.jpg


VD41tUr.jpg


kXxpQrp.png


The rest of these I'm not sure about:

PJZqrqD.jpg


hVRLGKe.jpg


0S4VRou.jpg


AFeSjQc.jpg


hqYjs6S.jpg


EsrsoTy.jpg


RxDQkQt.jpg


These last two are from the South Hill - Dunbar, KY F3 (specifically a chapel a few miles northeast of Richardsville):

8JGj2Wy.jpg


QjQCNeq.png
Hate to change the subject for a second, but I was looking around on YouTube when I came across a video () that contained multiple intriguing photographs from the Tupelo Tornado that I noticed that you included in your article. I was wondering if you would be able to send some of the original black and white photographs? I've only managed to find one of them on Facebook, which is this one below:

19360405TUPELO13.jpg

In particular, I was wondering if you had any of these photographs in your possesion. These are all screenshots from the video:

19360405TUPELO20.png
19360405TUPELO10.jpg
1691865308051.png
1691865319907.png
 

locomusic01

Member
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
3,839
Location
Pennsylvania
Hate to change the subject for a second, but I was looking around on YouTube when I came across a video that contained multiple intriguing photographs from the Tupelo Tornado that I noticed that you included in your article. I was wondering if you would be able to send some of the original black and white photographs? I've only managed to find one of them on Facebook, which is this one below:

View attachment 21349

In particular, I was wondering if you had any of these photographs in your possesion. These are all screenshots from the video:

View attachment 21350
View attachment 21351
View attachment 21352
View attachment 21353
The versions I have of the second and fourth photos look about the same as those quality-wise, but the others are better:

ChcliVM.jpg


dod1DEO.jpg


trOk9iA.jpg


gEhSSuP.jpg


I dunno if you wanted any others/which ones, but here are all the high-res originals I have:

qNGKmqr.jpg


0UyDuAT.jpg


4NvVwcr.jpg


EKqQu9O.jpg


eCwc6dD.jpg


nj5f1b3.jpg


AixiBAD.jpg


Ie6NPpe.jpg


HC9RAlj.jpg


iRVty6c.jpg


aObmGOj.jpg


Fzs1Hyy.jpg


vGlnu0M.jpg


ghcVyaO.jpg


XrV4tY3.jpg


Ar3kazw.jpg
 
Top