Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Oh it does, which suggests traditional anchoring methods (bolts) were used. I just wish there was a way to confirm it for 100% sure.The slab appears to at the least have sill plating.
View attachment 10396
WHY? THE PHILADELPHIA TORNADO GIVEN AN EF5 RATING BASED ON OVER 2 FEET OF GROUND SCOURING AND THE EL RENO 2011 TORNADO GIVEN AN EF5 RATING BASED MAINLY ON 2 MILLION POUND OIL RIG BEING ROLLED SEVERAL TIMES. THIS THING WITH WELL-BUILT ANCHORED HOMES BECAUSE THERE IS OTHER CONTEXTUAL EVIDENCE THAT SHOULD BE USED TO DETERMINE AN EF5 RATING. I ALSO DON'T ALWAYS BELIEVE EXPERTS SPOUT OUT BECAUSE THE EF-SCALE NEEDS MORE DI'S AND IS INCOMPLETE.I just don’t believe that an F5 or EF5 rating should be given in any situation where there is a lack of anchor bolting, regardless of context. Not saying that’s definitely the case here, but it is possible.
I’d also be careful about putting to much weight on the removal of plumbing features, as I don’t know of any study or case where plumbing damage was used as basis for an F5 or EF5 rating. I do know it was used as anecdotal support in Smithville, but there was already an immense amount of additional evidence that screamed EF5.
You do agree with the EF5 rating for the Philadelphia and El Reno 2011 tornadoes?I just don’t believe that an F5 or EF5 rating should be given in any situation where there is a lack of anchor bolting, regardless of context. Not saying that’s definitely the case here, but it is possible.
I’d also be careful about putting to much weight on the removal of plumbing features, as I don’t know of any study or case where plumbing damage was used as basis for an F5 or EF5 rating. I do know it was used as anecdotal support in Smithville, but there was already an immense amount of additional evidence that screamed EF5.
Well this contextual/structural damage from Westminster even though it is violent, it is a far cry from tornadoes like El Reno 2011, and Philadelphia 2011.WHY? THE PHILADELPHIA TORNADO GIVEN AN EF5 RATING BASED ON OVER 2 FEET OF GROUND SCOURING AND THE EL RENO 2011 TORNADO GIVEN AN EF5 RATING BASED MAINLY ON 2 MILLION POUND OIL RIG BEING ROLLED SEVERAL TIMES. THIS THING WITH WELL-BUILT ANCHORED HOMES BECAUSE THERE IS OTHER CONTEXTUAL EVIDENCE THAT SHOULD BE USED TO DETERMINE AN EF5 RATING. I ALSO DON'T ALWAYS BELIEVE EXPERTS SPOUT OUT BECAUSE THE EF-SCALE NEEDS MORE DI'S AND IS INCOMPLETE.
You don't need to type in all caps to get your point across.WHY? THE PHILADELPHIA TORNADO GIVEN AN EF5 RATING BASED ON OVER 2 FEET OF GROUND SCOURING AND THE EL RENO 2011 TORNADO GIVEN AN EF5 RATING BASED MAINLY ON 2 MILLION POUND OIL RIG BEING ROLLED SEVERAL TIMES. THIS THING WITH WELL-BUILT ANCHORED HOMES BECAUSE THERE IS OTHER CONTEXTUAL EVIDENCE THAT SHOULD BE USED TO DETERMINE AN EF5 RATING. I ALSO DON'T ALWAYS BELIEVE EXPERTS SPOUT OUT BECAUSE THE EF-SCALE NEEDS MORE DI'S AND IS INCOMPLETE.
Of the three tornadoes I would say Westminster was definitely the weakest, but all three were still well into the F5/EF5 category IMHO.Well this contextual/structural damage from Westminster even though it is violent, it is a far cry from tornadoes like El Reno 2011, and Philadelphia 2011.
Probably don't need to type in all caps here, looks like you're screaming lol.WHY? THE PHILADELPHIA TORNADO GIVEN AN EF5 RATING BASED ON OVER 2 FEET OF GROUND SCOURING AND THE EL RENO 2011 TORNADO GIVEN AN EF5 RATING BASED MAINLY ON 2 MILLION POUND OIL RIG BEING ROLLED SEVERAL TIMES. THIS THING WITH WELL-BUILT ANCHORED HOMES BECAUSE THERE IS OTHER CONTEXTUAL EVIDENCE THAT SHOULD BE USED TO DETERMINE AN EF5 RATING. I ALSO DON'T ALWAYS BELIEVE EXPERTS SPOUT OUT BECAUSE THE EF-SCALE NEEDS MORE DI'S AND IS INCOMPLETE.
Philadelphia, MS is obviously an exception to this. Relax.WHY? THE PHILADELPHIA TORNADO GIVEN AN EF5 RATING BASED ON OVER 2 FEET OF GROUND SCOURING AND THE EL RENO 2011 TORNADO GIVEN AN EF5 RATING BASED MAINLY ON 2 MILLION POUND OIL RIG BEING ROLLED SEVERAL TIMES. THIS THING WITH WELL-BUILT ANCHORED HOMES BECAUSE THERE IS OTHER CONTEXTUAL EVIDENCE THAT SHOULD BE USED TO DETERMINE AN EF5 RATING. I ALSO DON'T ALWAYS BELIEVE EXPERTS SPOUT OUT BECAUSE THE EF-SCALE NEEDS MORE DI'S AND IS INCOMPLETE.
No when I was typing the message I failed to realize the caps were on before it was too late and I was almost done. I didn't want to have to rewrite the message.Probably don't need to type in all caps here, looks like you're screaming lol.
Example of a supercell tornado in southwestern Siberia (Omsk Oblast) June 2017.
It does remind me a lot of the 2019 Allen SD tornado which was descbribed as a "hybrid" between a landspout and supercell tornado:Given how hollow and stationary it is, this seems more likely a landspout than a true tornado.
Not sure how a hybrid of the two would come about.....It does remind me a lot of the 2019 Allen SD tornado which was descbribed as a "hybrid" between a landspout and supercell tornado:
Never heard of a landspout being a violent EF4 or EF5 tornado, but I did read in a PDF that the 1988 Denver F3 tornado was a landspout. Not sure if that's true though.Not sure how a hybrid of the two would come about.....
Also, do you know of any instances of landspouts being violent, non-stationary and doing significant damage or resulting in fatalities?
I know it's virtually impossible to accurately rate a tornado based on a single damage photo, but certainly looks like an F5 candidate.Just sort of stumbled upon this one. The John Speirs farm west of Miller, SD was known as "one of the finest in the county," at least until July 1, 1928. That afternoon, a large F4 tornado swept across the property and leveled every single structure, sweeping several of them away and throwing heavy machinery up to half a mile. The photos here are quite small and don't offer a lot of detail, but the before and after is rather striking:
Btw, I assume the graphic says July 3 because that's when the photo was taken. The tornado itself occurred on July 1.
Example of a supercell tornado in southwestern Siberia (Omsk Oblast) June 2017.