Sooo...00Z Friday (6 PM CST Thursday) is now within NAM range as of 12Z.
It appears to be less progressive with the system, with the surface low near Wichita Falls, TX at that time, and the forecast soundings along the dryline just as ominous as they have been on the GFS for many days now.
It's kind of interesting how the GFS went through that phase of drastically speeding up the system to the point where I was questioning if the warm sector was even gonna still be on land anywhere by the time of peak heating on Friday...now it doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility that Thursday trends to another TX/OK threat and Friday in MS/AL/GA (I personally am not forecasting this outcome as of yet, just pointing out that it seems to be back on the table).
I must have missed what happened in Cheyenne Oklahoma cause a tornado related fatality is being reported out of there.
Whoops….I forgot to change the thread I thought I was on that one…You want this thread. Yes, there have been a lot of them lately. Also, sorry to hear that.
![]()
Svr Wx Threat Sun 2/26/2023 (KS, OK, TX, MO) & Mon 2/27/2023 (IL/IN/OH)
>1000 m2s2 of 0-1km and nearly 80kt at 1km, uhhhh yeah that will certainly do ittalkweather.com
Unlikely…..but possible…the last day 3 moderate was march 22 2022…Probably gunna see a large moderate risk tommorow on the day 3. Setting the stage for a high risk for missippi to east Texas.
Not sure why it wouldn't lol, unless confidence decreases today. This is the type of wording you usually get for a moderate outlookUnlikely…..but possible…the last day 3 moderate was march 22 2022…
Well this could explain all of chatter I was seeing right before this thread was created. Good GRIEF.![]()
Good lord CSU wyd?
45# on day 4 is absolutely ridiculous.
Well this could explain all of chatter I was seeing right before this thread was created. Good GRIEF.
Now these #s are for SVR probably, what about TOR probs specifically?
I need to find this website (again).
Extreme height falls is one. Which we haveAs 12Z GFS rolls in...it remains considerably more progressive than the NAM (dryline MUCH further east over TX at FH084/00Z Friday) but just as potent as ever. Perhaps an even more dangerous setup for AR/LA/MS, if that closer proximity to the frontal forcing and the upper system allows for initiation further out in the warm sector Thursday evening.
I haven't really looked into what the mesoscale mechanisms for open warm sector initiation might be with this setup, since it's still pretty early for that and Trey's videos are usually good for that.![]()
Extreme height falls is one. Which we have