• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Severe WX Severe Weather Threat June 19-28

WeathermanLeprechaun said:
Nope, like I thought after some suspicion, this is a photo that is real that got tweaked to feature a AI tornado in the back. While the RV park in question appears to have been genuinely hit, the tornado in the back is AI generated. This is gonna become a serious issue as AI gets better at generating tornadoes...

Also, it's been confirmed it was actually SLW that caused this at the RV park. But I'm still curious if it was a mix of sorts. 100+ mph SLW can do this absolutely, for sure.
Click to expand...
Good catch. It definitely seemed fishy to me at first but I didn’t really think twice of it myself. The fact that the tornado is so far away and still fully condensed despite the fact that tornadoes on this day were not long tracked at all was a big red flag that crossed my mind but I didn’t really think to explore more into.

My question is, what is the point of doing this? Why would people prompt AI to make it? It just doesn’t make any sense. Is there genuine personal gain to be had here?
 
slenker said:
Good catch. It definitely seemed fishy to me at first but I didn’t really think twice of it myself. The fact that the tornado is so far away and still fully condensed despite the fact that tornadoes on this day were not long tracked at all was a big red flag that crossed my mind but I didn’t really think to explore more into.

My question is, what is the point of doing this? Why would people prompt AI to make it? It just doesn’t make any sense. Is there genuine personal gain to be had here?
Click to expand...
I had a gut feeling it was. AI generates tornadoes in the background awfully blurry and slender like that. Your last point is why. Personal gain, attention and marketing. It looks like a cool, eerie photo because a RV park just got demolished (by SLW BTW) by a supposed tornado in the background. It looks like one of those stellar, once in a lifetime photos. I also know it's AI because these odd AI engagement farming accounts are the only ones to have posted this in particular. It's annoying. And concerning to see.
 
notsoencrypted said:
X checkmarked accounts can make money from interactions. A photo like that will get more engagement and thus earn them more money.
Click to expand...
I’m not a twitter/X user so I wouldn’t know. Thanks for the clarification. Pretty naive of me to believe that this didn’t have some sort of monetary or engagement bait level motivation to it.
 
StormNet been on Monday for a bit and HRRR got into range and it has a interesting post frontal/surface low setup in NE/SD. Certainly could be interesting potential as 300mb flow impinges into the region.

Guess what caveat this setup has as it's in Nebraska and it's June? Genuine question and if anyone gets it LOL
 

Attachments

  • hrrr_2026062706_042_42.02--99.21.png
    hrrr_2026062706_042_42.02--99.21.png
    256.6 KB · Views: 11
Last edited:
Monday could be a very volatile day near the warm front/triple point in ND/MN, especially if the moisture/LLJ hangs back west underneath the stronger flow aloft. One of those crazy parameter space days that actually may have a chance to initiate given the amplitude of the trough.

StormNet notably uptrended in its most recent run.
 


DILY STRENGTHENING DEEP-LAYER SHEAR WILL SUPPORT SUPERCELLS AS
THE INITIAL STORM MODE WITH THE PRIMARY HAZARD BEING LARGE TO VERY
LARGE HAIL. LOW-LEVEL SHEAR IS FORECAST TO STRENGTHEN THIS EVENING
IN THE VICINITY OF THE SURFACE LOW IN NORTHWEST SD AND SOUTHWEST ND
WITH A CONDITIONAL THREAT FOR A STRONG TORNADO OR TWO. HOWEVER,
THERE IS SOME UNCERTAINTY IN CONVECTIVE MODE AT THAT TIME AS
DEEP-LAYER SHEAR VECTORS TEND TO BACK TO A MORE NORTHERLY DIRECTION
IN THE VICINITY OF A STALLED SURFACE FRONT ALONG THE MT BORDER,
WHICH WILL BE CONDUCIVE FOR MIXED STORM MODES.
 
andyhb said:
Monday could be a very volatile day near the warm front/triple point in ND/MN, especially if the moisture/LLJ hangs back west underneath the stronger flow aloft. One of those crazy parameter space days that actually may have a chance to initiate given the amplitude of the trough.

StormNet notably uptrended in its most recent run.
Click to expand...
Yep. HRRR came in at 18z and soundings reveal a very impressive combination of thermodynamics/kinematics for the time of year. Morning convection doesn't appear to be particularly widespread, but i do have concern for a intense tornado risk already. Trying not to go overboard after my previous fails on a moderate risk, but i do think this is one of the more impressive parameter spaces of the year even if that could be said for many setups, this portion of the US rarely ever gets such a look.
 
IN WESTERN ND, THE CIG1 TORNADO AREA WAS EXTENDED SLIGHTLY
NORTHWARD. CONTINUED DIURNAL HEATING AMID UPPER 60S DEWPOINTS WILL
YIELD MODERATE-STRONG SURFACE-BASED BUOYANCY AND MINIMAL INHIBITION.
BACKED SURFACE WINDS BENEATH STRENGTHENING FLOW ALOFT WILL
CONTRIBUTE TO FAVORABLY CURVED HODOGRAPHS. ANY STORMS THAT CAN FORM
OR MOVE INTO THIS ENVIRONMENT WILL CONDITIONALLY SUPPORT A STRONG
TORNADO.
 
andyhb said:
Monday could be a very volatile day near the warm front/triple point in ND/MN, especially if the moisture/LLJ hangs back west underneath the stronger flow aloft. One of those crazy parameter space days that actually may have a chance to initiate given the amplitude of the trough.

StormNet notably uptrended in its most recent run.
Click to expand...
So I guess I may new to extend thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top