Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nice, I actually was gonna post a picture of this, I saved and cropped it etc, but forgot. ThanksSurprisingly few changes to the tornado risk, but here's a few I notice:
- More CIG1 connecting Illinois and Texas.
- Some 5% and 2% hatched in northern Ohio, almost all the way to Columbus. In the previous map Ohio only had a small area of 2% hatched.
First one. Whoop.New D1 has a CIG2 for hail in Texas!
View attachment 51279





For the people who have just woken up, CAMs have been a bit finicky regarding the time of storm initiation in the OWS, if initiation happens at all.
Every one of them show the same thing however, a south-to-north orientated bowing band of precip that shows up at around 3-4pm. This feature is crucial on weather OWS convection develops or not.
The reason why this banding forms can be traced back to south western Missouri. Here, a region of strong isentropic lift
develops (at around 9am) and propagates northeastward out ahead of the main forcing mechanism responsible for the later development of dryline/coldfront convenction.
View attachment 51288View attachment 51289
This isentropic lift and its propagation can be seen on these VWPs below.
View attachment 51290View attachment 51295View attachment 51296
It’s just under the inversion layer and depicted by the omega bars to the left. This inversion layer is overblown on the NAM models, but still respectively stout on all other CAMs.
Given the magnitude of surface heating, low to mid 80s, lllr, 7-8c/km, moisture content, 60-mid 60s dew, and lack of fog/low level cloud deck; this lifting front shouldn’t have too much difficulty in initiating convection in the OWS.
Main questions are still the timing of initiation, distribution of initiation (north or south of warm front), or will initiation even happen at all, which heavily depends on magnitude of the inversion layer. Even with or without OWS convection, once the main forcing mechanism arrives, the dryline will unzip and upscale growth capable of producing tornadoes (some strong) and most certainly damaging winds will be the main threat.
Hrrr is beginning to trend away from a solid squall line to a more semi discrete upscale growth.
Likely due to a slightly more stout inversion layer than previously modeled.
View attachment 51298View attachment 51299
RRFS shows pretty much an exact copy of the same scenario.
View attachment 51300View attachment 51301
Worth noting that this is the first implementation of any CIG level over 1 since the new scale introduced earlier in the month.New D1 has a CIG2 for hail in Texas!
View attachment 51279
Could be an active day ahead of us. Wonder if we’ll see an upgrade to a moderate risk.
I'd say its certainly a solid possibility, especially if this scenario from the 12z HRRR holds:Could be an active day ahead of us. Wonder if we’ll see an upgrade to a moderate risk.
