• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Severe Weather 2025

Interesting signals from the HRRR regarding tomorrow.

Surface inversion could limit storms being surface based but aside from that, i can see storm initiation here. It is notable that morning convection does to thru the area but it's a rather robust return for a day that I'm not sure was on many people's eyes before today. We will see. Intrigued if the MO/IL/KY border can do something with this environment tmrw
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2025-11-17-22-10-21-977.jpeg
    Screenshot_2025-11-17-22-10-21-977.jpeg
    217.3 KB · Views: 0
CIPS is picking up on the severe weather threat for Thursday.

View attachment 48673
Quick note that this version of CIPS actually isn't recommended for use and instead it's the one with "percentage of analogs" and a decently detailed space for parameters and analogs. It's oddly hard to find on Google though. I will share the link when I find it.
 
Interesting signals from the HRRR regarding tomorrow.

Surface inversion could limit storms being surface based but aside from that, i can see storm initiation here. It is notable that morning convection does to thru the area but it's a rather robust return for a day that I'm not sure was on many people's eyes before today. We will see. Intrigued if the MO/IL/KY border can do something with this environment tmrw
1763447261901.png
honestly looks pretty severe if no change happens.

events to watch for are events that have a parameter of..
BRN =10 to 45
DBRN = 0.16 to 0.6 (parameter i made , similar to BRN but replace the BWD6 with DCAPE)
LOW + MID RH = 65 to 89
CVTP = 1.813+ (parameter i made , corrected version of VTP)

tend to be the most dangerous events for Type 1 Tornado outbreaks , and this seems to be one of them.
 
View attachment 48687
honestly looks pretty severe if no change happens.

events to watch for are events that have a parameter of..
BRN =10 to 45
DBRN = 0.16 to 0.6 (parameter i made , similar to BRN but replace the BWD6 with DCAPE)
LOW + MID RH = 65 to 89
CVTP = 1.813+ (parameter i made , corrected version of VTP)

tend to be the most dangerous events for Type 1 Tornado outbreaks , and this seems to be one of them.
It's all dependant on the warm front. But there is dangerous kinematics at play, even though BRN suggests the possibility of shear dominating the event meaning storms may not sustain well in the hotspot for storms.

That being said, i do think a very low end, conditional strong tornado is possible with any sustained supercell that could warrant a mesoscale interaction, perhaps even with the warm front. The kinematics and thermodynamics should barely be enough to carry the threat over.
 
View attachment 48687
honestly looks pretty severe if no change happens.

events to watch for are events that have a parameter of..
BRN =10 to 45
DBRN = 0.16 to 0.6 (parameter i made , similar to BRN but replace the BWD6 with DCAPE)
LOW + MID RH = 65 to 89
CVTP = 1.813+ (parameter i made , corrected version of VTP)

tend to be the most dangerous events for Type 1 Tornado outbreaks , and this seems to be one of them.
You change the super outbreak parameter to something more useful like MCS or squal line likelihood. Even though it seems psuedo-sciencey it's still fun seeing your concepts evolve over time! Good work!
 
Latest outlook mentions a potential upgrade at 20z if confidence in surface based storms close to the low/warm front appear apparent. Sneaky day incoming.
SLGT or 5#? If the 5# officially existed, this would be the day to use it in that same corridor that was impacted by the Blodgett-London cell on May 16.
 
Interesting CU field in Missouri. I honestly feel like a big outlier regarding a strong tornado today, but I can't pass by strong kinematics upwards of 250+ with a discrete mode and warm front without considering it. Sure, the chances are low that we actually see one but it really isn't out of the question today for me personally. As the stable layer fills in, it will be gradually harder to produce tornadoes but any cell that can drill through the stable layer may produce tornadoes.
 

Attachments

  • media_G6Df3ESWYAA9bfH.jpg_name=small&format=webp.webp
    media_G6Df3ESWYAA9bfH.jpg_name=small&format=webp.webp
    42.8 KB · Views: 0
Couple of tasty-looking (from the perspective of a guy who hasn't chased since July 16th, and before that, May 19th) discrete cells southeast of Lincoln, IL, both severe-warned.

Surface conditions are approximately 51/47. That seems too stable for a tornado threat, but after what happened in southern WI on February 8, 2024 I can't rule anything out.
 
RadarOmega really needs to work on their 3D Volumetric Radar application. Every time I open it, its slow to zoom in and freezes up.
 
Dresden, TN Storm
 

Attachments

  • RadarOmega_screenshot_2025_11_19_01_46_20.png
    RadarOmega_screenshot_2025_11_19_01_46_20.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 0
The setup for tomorrow/Friday has kind of fizzled with the main trough hanging way back to the west, and a general lack of instability.

GFS has been teasing another potential threat for around next Tuesday the 25th, note how on the 06Z run a compact trough swings through, starts out positively tilted but becomes more neutrally tilted with time, and some adequate instability depicted over at least the southern portions of MS/AL. Although it seems like we have seen a number of these show up and then downtrend with time over the last two weeks or so, so I'm skeptical for now.
 
Back
Top