• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Severe WX Severe Threat 25 March 2021

Ingyball

Member
Meteorologist
Messages
15
Reaction score
26
Location
Miami Florida
So one thing about the HRRR, even with the messy storm mode the environment behind it is still more than suitable for strong tornadoes in northern Alabama. You combine that with possible outflow boundaries from the previous storms that discrete cells could ride on and then you're looking at trouble. 1 to 2 hours of destabilization would only add fuel to the fire.
 

Kory

Member
Messages
4,928
Reaction score
2,119
Location
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
So one thing about the HRRR, even with the messy storm mode the environment behind it is still more than suitable for strong tornadoes in northern Alabama. You combine that with possible outflow boundaries from the previous storms that discrete cells could ride on and then you're looking at trouble. 1 to 2 hours of destabilization would only add fuel to the fire.
Correct...and south of that complex is where discrete convection would take hold in a cleaner warm sector.
 

Clancy

Member
Messages
2,547
Reaction score
4,615
Location
Macland, Georgia
IF the 0z nam is right, this will be a high end event. 996mb low near Memphis in late March with readily accessible high Td's and clean warm sector. At face value- recipe for disaster.
Goes to show nothing here is settled yet. Don't write *anything* off, but don't mentally go all in. Still a long way to go and lots more data to take in.
 

Jacob

Member
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
829
Location
Roy, UT
IF the 0z nam is right, this will be a high end event. 996mb low near Memphis in late March with readily accessible high Td's and clean warm sector. At face value- recipe for disaster.

Oddly enough, the actual storm depiction from the 0z NAM is a big nothing-burger for all but extreme N Alabama. It seems to be on an island all by itself in that regard though.
 

Jacob

Member
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
829
Location
Roy, UT
The NAM's convective parameterization scheme is explicitly designed to not initiate if the mid-levels are dry.

Well that certainly explains it. In an odd way, the NAM not showing it could be interpreted as a worse sign. That'd be a fun thing to explain to some.
 

Keldeo

Member
Messages
62
Reaction score
42
Location
North Little Rock
This sounding from the NAM is uhhh not good. Northern Mississippi
image0.png
 

Fred Gossage

Member
Meteorologist
PerryW Project Supporter
Messages
597
Reaction score
2,116
Location
Florence, AL
You do understand that the NAM isn't a CAM right? It isn't able to process convection/thunderstorms.
And its parameterization scheme to make up for that is explicitly designed to not model activity if there is dry mid-level air. It's an extremely well known bias in the scheme. Rich Thomspon talked about it in detail a few years ago in his tornado forecasting video series.

I think we're actually trying to hint at the same point lol
 
Back
Top