- Messages
- 6,437
- Location
- Birmingham
That's not good, well they typically do expand as we get closer though I always forget about that.Tbf it has been expanding incrementally run-to-run.
That's not good, well they typically do expand as we get closer though I always forget about that.Tbf it has been expanding incrementally run-to-run.
At least it's better than the NAM, which starts small and stays small until like 3 hours before an event beginsThat's not good, well they typically do expand as we get closer though I always forget about that.
Ive been checking the theta e some. It looks like when the QCLS/broken supercell line. Gets too Alabama that instability is going to be more refined to central Alabama and South and same into Georgia. But places west will be a bit further north. The instability looks similar to our last QLCS tornado outbreakAt least it's better than the NAM, which starts small and stays small until like 3 hours before an event begins![]()
Yeah, with the slower timing it'll be a proper nighttime event in AL and parts of GA (if chronology holds). In all scenarios it looks pretty nasty for ArkLaMiss.Ive been checking the theta e some. It looks like when the QCLS/broken supercell line. Gets too Alabama that instability is going to be more refined to central Alabama and South and same into Georgia. But places west will be a bit further north. The instability looks similar to our last QLCS tornado outbreak
No more whack-a-mole spin ups in Alabama please.Yeah, with the slower timing it'll be a proper nighttime event in AL and parts of GA (if chronology holds). In all scenarios it looks pretty nasty for ArkLaMiss.
Hard agree.No more whack-a-mole spin ups in Alabama please.
Pictures or it didn’t happen lolNewest GFS run screams supercells. The warm sector is a bit small though
It actually looks like those highest values are behind the front, with the slightly lower values of 1.2 and 1.4 over the Carolinas and Virginia being in the WS. SHERB can produce some wacky values because it's trying to calculate tornadogenic conditions in HSLC setups.Traditional ingredients may not be as prevalent on current GFS runs, but it seems SHERB is popping for Alabama.
View attachment 34230
Where did you find this? I have never heard of SHERB.Traditional ingredients may not be as prevalent on current GFS runs, but it seems SHERB is popping for Alabama.
View attachment 34230
It's under the Severe tab here: https://www.eas.slu.edu/CIPS/MODEL/WXmodel.phpWhere did you find this? I have never heard of SHERB.
Thank youIt's under the Severe tab here: https://www.eas.slu.edu/CIPS/MODEL/WXmodel.php
It actually looks like those highest values are behind the front, with the slightly lower values of 1.2 and 1.4 over the Carolinas and Virginia being in the WS. SHERB can produce some wacky values because it's trying to calculate tornadogenic conditions in HSLC setups.
So then on my link would that be the Effective SHERB?Fun tidbit: SHERBE attempts to correct for the wonky high values SHERB can produce. The difference being the fixed layer shear term is swapped for EBWD.
https://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/mesoanalysis/help/help_sherbe.html
YepSo then on my link would that be the Effective SHERB?
That doesn’t look good