Officially Beryl, according to the latest SHIPS. At 55%, it is essentially explicitly forecasting a 65kt growth in 72 hours, to around 100 knots (about 110 mph). Still looking potent at 5-6 days out, assuming it avoids major land masses.
EDIT: I'll also note -- for the GFS detractors, the SHIPS model gets some of its predictors from the GFS, but all of its model is a purely statistical approach based on a large dataset of historical storms. It is continuously refined by the NHC and its statistically validity is tested on an ongoing basis. It uses a multiple linear regression model to factor in many key variables in intensity forecasting. It is still imperfect, though, and has a tough time with RI and RW sometimes (as all models do currently -- it'd be essentially the holy grail of TC forecasting if we could find a model to accurately predict RI and RW). Just wanted to point this out. SHIPS uses some of the GFS's data, for example, for Relative humidity forecasted. But it is much more than just what the GFS gives.
View attachment 28905