• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER
  • April 2024 Weather Video of the Month
    Post your nominations now!

Marshal79344

Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
1,066
Location
Chicago, IL
This link has aerial footage of the Tri-State tornado's path through Murphysboro and De Soto. As you'd expect from footage taken with a 1925 camera from a 1925 plane, it's pretty lacking from a fine detail perspective. But man the scope of the damage is astonishing.This may also be the first instance of tornado damage being documented by aerial film/photography but I'm not sure. Think it also slightly more footage and may be of slightly better quality than what's available on YouTube.
https://digital.tcl.sc.edu/digital/collection/MVTN/id/3249

Some aerial photos I have. They certainly support an unusually large contour of violent tornado damage, clearly multiple-vortex.

19250318MURPHYSBORO27.PNG19250318MURPHYSBORO11.jpg
 

Marshal79344

Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
1,066
Location
Chicago, IL
Some more obscure photos of Parkersburg that I believe haven't been posted in here. The tornado evolved after several convective mergers resulted in one, dominant supercell forming. There were several instances of extremely severe debarking in town. The intensity also seemed to increase dramatically as the tornado moved through town, as buildings on the southeastern side of the town seemed to be completely swept away. The violent contour of damage continued well into rural areas as well

20080525PARKERSBURG38.jpg
20080525PARKERSBURG21.jpg20080525PARKERSBURG36.jpg
20080525PARKERSBURG37.jpg

One thing I found quite unusual was how the damage seemed to definitely decrease in intensity as it approached the grain bins (I'm not sure what it's called but I think it's called that), but then it picked right back up.

20080525PARKERSBURG31.jpg

Here are some photos in rural areas near New Hartford.

20080525PARKERSBURG23.jpg20080525PARKERSBURG22.jpg20080525PARKERSBURG19.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20080525PARKERSBURG12.jpg
    20080525PARKERSBURG12.jpg
    341.5 KB · Views: 0
Messages
2,234
Reaction score
2,825
Location
Missouri
Some more obscure photos of Parkersburg that I believe haven't been posted in here. The tornado evolved after several convective mergers resulted in one, dominant supercell forming. There were several instances of extremely severe debarking in town. The intensity also seemed to increase dramatically as the tornado moved through town, as buildings on the southeastern side of the town seemed to be completely swept away. The violent contour of damage continued well into rural areas as well

View attachment 8297
View attachment 8299View attachment 8298
View attachment 8304

One thing I found quite unusual was how the damage seemed to definitely decrease in intensity as it approached the grain bins (I'm not sure what it's called but I think it's called that), but then it picked right back up.

View attachment 8300

Here are some photos in rural areas near New Hartford.

View attachment 8302View attachment 8303View attachment 8301
The last photo, the aerial of Parkersburg, REALLY impressive. It reminds me of Barneveld in that it was increasing in intensity as it was passing through (obviously Parkersburg was WAY more intense then Barneveld) and you can see what looks like some pretty intense wind rowing or ground scouring in the bottom right of the photo.
 

Robinson lee

Member
Messages
72
Reaction score
138
Location
tianjin
Parkersburg is definitely an extremely violent EF5 tornado. I have a picture of the destruction of Parkersburg after it left town. Some houses have been swept down, and traces of scouring can be seen in the fields nearby. I was surprised that the tornado passed through an industrial area, and the damage here was much weaker than that in other places. I was curious about the reasons
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2021_0327_200449.png
    Screenshot_2021_0327_200449.png
    635.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_2021_0327_201149.png
    Screenshot_2021_0327_201149.png
    465.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_2021_0327_201455.png
    Screenshot_2021_0327_201455.png
    109.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_2021_0327_201649.png
    Screenshot_2021_0327_201649.png
    112.2 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_2021_0327_201423.png
    Screenshot_2021_0327_201423.png
    230 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot_2021_0327_200412.png
    Screenshot_2021_0327_200412.png
    155.1 KB · Views: 0
Messages
2,234
Reaction score
2,825
Location
Missouri
Here's a terrible, terrible quality photo I have of the home swept away by Red Rock

View attachment 8192
Some other damage pics and articles on this thing:

QQ20200507180852.jpg

QQ20200507181949.jpg

228905_438169139558046_302494256_n.jpg

 

locomusic01

Member
Messages
1,359
Reaction score
3,790
Location
Pennsylvania
Wasn't sure where else to put this. This is a pretty cool presentation with arresting visuals:


Leigh has a number of presentations online about his modeling work and they're really fascinating. The last I saw, he was running simulations at 10-meter resolutions, which is super cool and reveals all sorts of weird stuff.
 
Messages
272
Reaction score
239
Location
Smoke Rise, AL (25 mi. N of downtown Birmingham)
I've never really seen the Hackleburg tornado as exceptional among the EF5s, but the most impressive thing to me is the sheer length of time it maintained EF4 intensity - or at least the capability thereof - with EF5 pockets. The longevity of violent damage, exceptional path length (132 miles) and death toll (72, deadliest in state history, and an apparently very severe above ground survival ratio) are probably more impressive than the relatively standard EF5 damage it caused; both Mississippi EF5s were likely more intense.

This is what I was wondering about mostly. Not the number of EF5 data points, or the maximum intensity, but the length of the path containing them. But I can certainly understand that some tornadoes are more intensely scrutinized than others with more effort to find EF5 damage?
 

KoD

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Sustaining Member
PerryW Project Supporter
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
697
Location
Huntsville, AL
This is what I was wondering about mostly. Not the number of EF5 data points, or the maximum intensity, but the length of the path containing them. But I can certainly understand that some tornadoes are more intensely scrutinized than others with more effort to find EF5 damage?
Yeah surely there's variability between surveyors, not just who they are but also how much area they have to survey (multiple tracks, length of tracks), budget, time to do it. I imagine the biggest thing would be viable EF5 DI's though. There's just not a lot a violent tornado can hit to get that kind of rating as even the upper bound of many DI's maxes out at EF3/EF4 ratings.
 

Marshal79344

Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
1,066
Location
Chicago, IL
I haven't seen anybody post about this particular event in this forum's history, but November 24, 2001, was a very significant Dixie Alley Tornado Event, with numerous rounds of supercells producing many significant tornadoes, a couple of which were intense. This post is going to talk about the most violent and worst tornado of the event.

ERA-5 Reanalysis for Theta-E Advection during the Tornado Outbreak

1617546031119.png

For some reason that I don't know, but likely was regarding the thermodynamics in the warm sector, open-warm sector convection had trouble sustaining themselves. Three different cells fired. The northern one produced an F3 Tornado before merging with the second one. They both proceeded to dissipate. However, the southernmost cell, which was on a trajectory to the areas just north of the Jackson suburbs, persisted the longest. It eventually wrapped up and dropped a tornado at the suburb of Madison in the early morning hours of November 24th. The tornado rapidly intensified, and with a fearful roar that sounded like freight trains, descended on the Fairfield Subdivision, which was made up of new, brick homes. Several homes in the subdivision were leveled, and two people lost their lives. The tornado quickly dissipated soon afterwards and the parent supercell failed to sustain itself and also dissipated.

The Tornado on Radar:

20011124MADISON.png

Damage Photos from the Fairfield Subdivision

20011124MADISON.jpg20011124MADISON2.jpg20011124MADISON4.jpg20011124MADISON6.jpg20011124MADISON7.jpg20011124MADISON8.jpg
20011124MADISON9.jpg
20011124MADISON12.jpg

Needless to say, the tornado definitely deserved the F4 rating. I'm certain it would have attained an EF4 rating today.
 

pohnpei

Member
Messages
963
Reaction score
1,969
Location
shanghai
Some more obscure photos of Parkersburg that I believe haven't been posted in here. The tornado evolved after several convective mergers resulted in one, dominant supercell forming. There were several instances of extremely severe debarking in town. The intensity also seemed to increase dramatically as the tornado moved through town, as buildings on the southeastern side of the town seemed to be completely swept away. The violent contour of damage continued well into rural areas as well

View attachment 8297
View attachment 8299View attachment 8298
View attachment 8304

One thing I found quite unusual was how the damage seemed to definitely decrease in intensity as it approached the grain bins (I'm not sure what it's called but I think it's called that), but then it picked right back up.

View attachment 8300

Here are some photos in rural areas near New Hartford.

View attachment 8302View attachment 8303View attachment 8301
Grain bins damage(I'm not sure what it's called but I think it's called that) was not a DI yet so I also know little about it. Here was some observation of mine. Just trying to explain that grain bin damage from Pakersburg tornado.
Destroying grain bins full of grains are harder than we may think about. But even EF1 tornado can destory empty grain bins. There are several cases that I can think of about violent tornado direct hit grain bins likely full of grains:
Case 1:
2015 Rochelle tornado swept away a well-built farmsteadand reduce a 40 ft (12 m) reinforced concrete silo into a pile of rubble. in this picture. This damage was rated 200mph by NWS. Winds at this place very likely into EF5 level yet still a grain bin was not destroyed at all. I think very likely it was full of grains.
46.jpg

Case 2:
Judging from Landsat, 2011 Berlin tornado likely direct hit or at least near direct hit this area. It can be seen from these vehicle damage that how intense tornado was in this area. Some likely empty grain bin was gone yet still one grain bin likely full of grains remian eract.
125321yoaot43oupaau1av.jpg

Case 3:
2004 Marion tornado went directly through this place with some empty grain binswept away, debris wrapping around the shelterbelt behind this place. Tornado likely being very violent in this area yet those grain bins full of grains were not destoryed.
QQ图片20201201175330.jpgQQ图片20201201175327.jpg

Case 4:
2010 Hollandale, MN EF3 direct hit this place, some barns and farmstead swept away yet grain bins full of grains still stand despite tornado likely capable of doing violent damage here.
QQ图片20200506212013.jpg

The most memorable grain bins damage to me was Pilger tornado 2014. These destroyed bins was not empty but also not full of grains. Some of these grain bins were tossed out of the town by the tornado.
j1dCnpB2_1403030100316.jpg
53a0bff7a2ebd.image (1).jpg
grain bins tossed out of the town and full of dirt:

QQ截图20201221161016.jpg

Look back to the grain bin damage of Pakersburg
Not sure about the construction, but there was house swept away in this place with large vehicle overturn nearby. I assume that it is very hard to destory these grain bins for sure full of grains in tornado's path. But tornado slightly weakened in this area was also very likely.
QQ截图20210404230106.jpg
 
Last edited:

pohnpei

Member
Messages
963
Reaction score
1,969
Location
shanghai
I haven't seen anybody post about this particular event in this forum's history, but November 24, 2001, was a very significant Dixie Alley Tornado Event, with numerous rounds of supercells producing many significant tornadoes, a couple of which were intense. This post is going to talk about the most violent and worst tornado of the event.

ERA-5 Reanalysis for Theta-E Advection during the Tornado Outbreak

View attachment 8316

For some reason that I don't know, but likely was regarding the thermodynamics in the warm sector, open-warm sector convection had trouble sustaining themselves. Three different cells fired. The northern one produced an F3 Tornado before merging with the second one. They both proceeded to dissipate. However, the southernmost cell, which was on a trajectory to the areas just north of the Jackson suburbs, persisted the longest. It eventually wrapped up and dropped a tornado at the suburb of Madison in the early morning hours of November 24th. The tornado rapidly intensified, and with a fearful roar that sounded like freight trains, descended on the Fairfield Subdivision, which was made up of new, brick homes. Several homes in the subdivision were leveled, and two people lost their lives. The tornado quickly dissipated soon afterwards and the parent supercell failed to sustain itself and also dissipated.

The Tornado on Radar:

View attachment 8317

Damage Photos from the Fairfield Subdivision

View attachment 8314View attachment 8315View attachment 8318View attachment 8319View attachment 8320View attachment 8321
View attachment 8322
View attachment 8323

Needless to say, the tornado definitely deserved the F4 rating. I'm certain it would have attained an EF4 rating today.
It make me think of Altoona tornado from this event. I am very confused about the rating of this tornado.
It can be seen from the NWS website that these two pics below was when tornado reached F4 intensity:
emmm... It was just... I even questioned whether these damages can earn EF3 rating nowadays.
20011124 02.jpg
picture5 (1).jpg
 
Last edited:

eric11

Member
Messages
309
Reaction score
711
Location
Shanghai,China
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
  2. ARRL Member
Some more obscure photos of Parkersburg that I believe haven't been posted in here. The tornado evolved after several convective mergers resulted in one, dominant supercell forming. There were several instances of extremely severe debarking in town. The intensity also seemed to increase dramatically as the tornado moved through town, as buildings on the southeastern side of the town seemed to be completely swept away. The violent contour of damage continued well into rural areas as well

View attachment 8297
View attachment 8299View attachment 8298
View attachment 8304

One thing I found quite unusual was how the damage seemed to definitely decrease in intensity as it approached the grain bins (I'm not sure what it's called but I think it's called that), but then it picked right back up.

View attachment 8300

Here are some photos in rural areas near New Hartford.

View attachment 8302View attachment 8303View attachment 8301
Parkersburg did some ridiculous damage in the town yet cannot be explained like this one,
some sort of rubber layer being peeled off a concrete telephone pole?
IMG_20210405_021815.jpg
Another two mangled cars with only the twisted axles remaining
-39d942d4b889cfa3b4d4fd85714ded8f.jpg
7f225e1c1f74ac2ed5f642dadbf08aed.jpg
Car axle and a tire wrapped around a tree
-4b00d3c2c7ab455da0c5dfb2b4ffefb8.jpg
Some extreme ground scouring occurred in the windward slope near a small county Rd, as entire top layer of soil and grass were removed, note the windward slope tend to accelerate the horizontal wind and lead to more violent upward motion in microscale environment, similar phenomenon was pointed out by Jeff Piotrowski during the Jonesboro tornado damage survey last year
-451c8007ebc591abc65885011df72b5e.jpg
Common extreme debarking that you'll see in every other high-end EF5s.
66ca89bbf1aff478e5fe58c170d69db2.png
-168c0dc367063830b635c12d2b13055b.png
25b1c3b627e86aa3a59eae3e42f4e81d.jpg
5a42618c8e7426c16d89dd3d50b81eaf.png
This is a cemetery looking from a different angle of your pic 6
-273e63e64375deccfee58eae0be0f3f1.jpg
 
Last edited:

eric11

Member
Messages
309
Reaction score
711
Location
Shanghai,China
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
  2. ARRL Member
A lot of you have probably already seen most of these already, but here is my "Parkersburg was way more violent than everyone remembers" post. The damage that occurred in the golf course subdivision at the east side of town was about as high-end as it gets. These large homes were of exceptional construction, and some were left with virtually no visible debris. The type of damage that occurred in this area was about on par with Bridge Creek 1999. The last photo is an aerial of this area. Notice how there is no traceable debris pattern at some of the obliterated homes:
WhMfPcA.png

eQ4R7jc.jpg

RBTFF76.png

Z4oVbh7.png

3J2b2S4.png

OidMbRz.jpg
Yeah these were the same houses that had been claimed to be pretty well-built and some of them were constructed in less than three years according to extremeplanet, the tornado likely reached maximum strength right here, the wind were so strong that it caused the joint between the poured concrete inner walls and the foundation to shake and loose despite standard anchoring and nails were used
4688293501f325a5340c384a53f45a58.jpg
136248fd7342e3af116deade7f4c40ff.jpg
I'm curious whether these two pics were also taken near the Golf Course Subdivision
-281888aacda8270e5b0a5a77e7b2dc04.jpg
-63e00cb5add30810fd643cc07b86d92.jpg
There's some ground scouring to the east of this area
-599d290781b57da47cf83ee924de3d9a.jpg
Oak hill cemetery from a closer view
6d62a2a28faa7783d42ec6b776b8a55a.jpg
 
Last edited:
Messages
2,234
Reaction score
2,825
Location
Missouri
I haven't seen anybody post about this particular event in this forum's history, but November 24, 2001, was a very significant Dixie Alley Tornado Event, with numerous rounds of supercells producing many significant tornadoes, a couple of which were intense. This post is going to talk about the most violent and worst tornado of the event.

ERA-5 Reanalysis for Theta-E Advection during the Tornado Outbreak

View attachment 8316

For some reason that I don't know, but likely was regarding the thermodynamics in the warm sector, open-warm sector convection had trouble sustaining themselves. Three different cells fired. The northern one produced an F3 Tornado before merging with the second one. They both proceeded to dissipate. However, the southernmost cell, which was on a trajectory to the areas just north of the Jackson suburbs, persisted the longest. It eventually wrapped up and dropped a tornado at the suburb of Madison in the early morning hours of November 24th. The tornado rapidly intensified, and with a fearful roar that sounded like freight trains, descended on the Fairfield Subdivision, which was made up of new, brick homes. Several homes in the subdivision were leveled, and two people lost their lives. The tornado quickly dissipated soon afterwards and the parent supercell failed to sustain itself and also dissipated.

The Tornado on Radar:

View attachment 8317

Damage Photos from the Fairfield Subdivision

View attachment 8314View attachment 8315View attachment 8318View attachment 8319View attachment 8320View attachment 8321
View attachment 8322
View attachment 8323

Needless to say, the tornado definitely deserved the F4 rating. I'm certain it would have attained an EF4 rating today.
Another notable November outbreak that somehow hasn't been mentioned on here yet is the November 9-11, 2002 outbreak, aka Veterans Day weekend tornado outbreak. It was extraordinary widespread for a November event (the geographical expanse of it comes close to 4/3/74 at times) and is one of the deadliest November outbreaks.


Article on the Van Wert, Ohio F4 that was the strongest tornado of the outbreak:


The demolished movie theater. Note the direction of the steel beams; it looks like very narrow and defined damage, perhaps the result of a narrow suction vortex?

1.jpg2.png3.jpg


Spectacular home video of it:

 

speedbump305

Member
Messages
495
Reaction score
140
Location
Cypress Texas
Yeah these were the same houses that had been claimed to be pretty well-built and some of them were constructed in less than three years according to extremeplanet, the tornado likely reached maximum strength right here, the wind were so strong that it caused the joint between the poured concrete inner walls and the foundation to shake and loose despite standard anchoring and nails were used
View attachment 8348
View attachment 8352
I'm curious whether these two pics were also taken near the Golf Course Subdivision
View attachment 8349
View attachment 8350
There's some ground scouring to the east of this area
View attachment 8351
Oak hill cemetery from a closer view
View attachment 8353
I’m honestly really wondering just how violent parkersburg really was
 
Messages
2,855
Reaction score
4,647
Location
Madison, WI
I’m honestly really wondering just how violent parkersburg really was

I would put Parkersburg and El Reno '11 as the two most impressive of the official EF5s. Smithville next. Hackleburg stands out for breadth and longevity, and Joplin for the damage to the hospital and office buildings. Moore is right up there as well. Although really, it's splitting hairs because when you are talking about E/F5s (except those highly questionable ratings like Belmond 1966) and even most high-end EF4s, you are talking about the strongest 1% (or less) of all tornadoes and are going to see extreme/"incredible" instances of damage in all cases.
 

buckeye05

Member
Messages
3,313
Reaction score
5,065
Location
Colorado
It make me think of Altoona tornado from this event. I am very confused about the rating of this tornado.
It can be seen from the NWS website that these two pics below was when tornado reached F4 intensity:
emmm... It was just... I even questioned whether these damages can earn EF3 rating nowadays.
View attachment 8334
View attachment 8336
The rating was apparently based on that house in the first photo. It was leveled, and assuming decent construction, it meets the criteria.
 

Nightking2021

Member
Messages
66
Reaction score
29
Location
Wichita, Kansas
I would put Parkersburg and El Reno '11 as the two most impressive of the official EF5s. Smithville next. Hackleburg stands out for breadth and longevity, and Joplin for the damage to the hospital and office buildings. Moore is right up there as well. Although really, it's splitting hairs because when you are talking about E/F5s (except those highly questionable ratings like Belmond 1966) and even most high-end EF4s, you are talking about the strongest 1% (or less) of all tornadoes and are going to see extreme/"incredible" instances of damage in all cases.
Only about .1 to .2 % of all tornadoes are rated high-end EF4 or greater. Here is a list. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enhanced_Fujita_scale
 
Logo 468x120
Back
Top