• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Severe WX Severe Weather 4/24-4/26

Something VERY interesting is the disagreement between CSU models and the SPC for Monday in terms of area of most interest. CSU points out the Tennessee Valley to Memphis as the area of greatest concern, while the SPC has moved it up to the Midwest again, around Illinois and Missouri.

I think you will see the SPC risk area and the area suggested by the models converge in the coming days. There’s been more than a few instances with higher-end set-ups affecting this specific region where they seem to start a bit more westerly with their risks, then adjust eastward as confidence increases in the timing and location of the trough.

Edit: I am guessing that them keeping the risk area west of where the modeled bullseye currently is may also be a reflection of the models generally being too progressive with these bigger troughs at-range. I think that’s been an issue with some of these setups in the past 2-3 years?
 
Last edited:
The OWS y’all have been sharing on Monday definitely has my eye as well. We haven’t had a set-up with an OWS this size since March 31, 2023, and I think you could reasonably argue this one may be even more dynamic and dangerous across a larger geographic area than that day as currently modeled. Just as an example, MUCAPE for this set-up is approaching 3-4K versus 1,500-2,500 for much of the 3/31 OWS with relatively similar kinematics at-play. If we had this kind of instability across the Dixie high-risk that day, those strong to intense tornadoes would have almost certainly been violent.
 
Last edited:
The OWS y’all have been sharing on Monday definitely has my eye as well. We haven’t had a set-up with an OWS this size since March 31, 2023, and I think you could reasonably argue this one may be even more dynamic and dangerous across a larger geographic area than that day as currently modeled. Just as an example, MUCAPE for this set-up is approaching 3-4K versus 1,500-2,500 for much of the 3/31 OWS.
having that kind of synoptic setup with late April thermodynamics instead of late March thermodynamics is...no bueno.
 
The OWS y’all have been sharing on Monday definitely has my eye as well. We haven’t had a set-up with an OWS this size since March 31, 2023, and I think you could reasonably argue this one may be even more dynamic and dangerous across a larger geographic area than that day as currently modeled. Just as an example, MUCAPE for this set-up is approaching 3-4K versus 1,500-2,500 for much of the 3/31 OWS.
Yes agree. March 31. 2023 date I was trying remember . Reminds me that with this being much higher potential risk going off latest trends .cape nearing 4000 with dew points 70 vertical shear 40 to 60 kts nothing sneeze at . Got good backing the winds at 500
Mb . This is pointing to potential red letter day some. Where Monday afternoon
 
There's a thread for site issues now. Here's the latest from there.

Over the next two days we will be taking early morning outages to restore attachments. We will be downloading and then uploading our S3 buckets from AWS and moving them to Cloudflare storage. Naturally, we've had a lot of attachments over the years so this does take a bit and there needs to be some config changes as well. This will also complete our move away from AWS as well.
 
I believe that analog popped up a couple days out from the mon/tue threat last week, so I'm cautiously hoping that the comparison doesn't ring true this time.
While that analog can be a data point worth considering, I will note that it does pop up a TON when we have setups like this, especially ones with this kind of instability.
 
SPC also state they expect supercells:

"By Monday afternoon, additional thunderstorms are expected to
develop along and east of an advancing dryline/cold front in an
increasingly unstable atmosphere. Diurnal heating of a boundary
layer with low-to-mid-60Fs dewpoints should result in SBCAPE/MUCAPE
values between 2000-3000 J/kg. Additionally, vertical shear will
remain more than sufficient for supercells. All severe hazards will
remain possible with this convection, with the greatest
concentration of severe storms likely across the Mid-Mississippi
Valley where a 30% area was introduced."
 
It's worth mentioning that 3/31/23 was looking impressive but not "high-risk" until the day of, and 4/4 that same year was looking extremely dangerous until just before it occurred too. This still has time to downtrend, and honestly I expect to see some downtrends for Monday, since we've seen it time and time again this year. It's statistically very, very unlikely for an upcoming event to just not downtrend and only go up from when the threat becomes apparent 5-7 days out. This could just be a huff of copium from me, though - as they always say, prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
 
I think, even with the possibility of some left over storms from Sunday, the thermodynamic environment for Monday looks to be locking in. That moisture isn’t going to get swept out between now and then.

I think now you need to start looking at where your kinematics are best across the area. This is a massive OWS as others have mentioned. This is really my big question mark right now for this set up is the mid level shear and some of the kinematics.
 
There seems to be, as a few have already mentioned, a bifocal aspect to Monday's threat. While there seems to be an apex in the parameter space over the area where the SPC highlighted, threat longevity is likely to be highest further south into the Tennessee Valley and Southeast. The kinematics overnight across the Deep South will be very strong, and even in the absence of diurnal heating, strongly-forced storms will have no problem sustaining themselves and mesocyclones, thanks to our 850 mb LLJ, in very classic Deep South fashion. I wouldn't be surprised if the southern portion of this event looked a bit like 4/28/14 with regard to the MS/AL area. Interestingly, 06Z GFS hints at weak, secondary low development on Wednesday afternoon across the Southeast, with the possibility of a second round of severe storms following the first that comes through late Monday night into Tuesday morning. It doesn't have a classic tornado look by any means, but strong instability will be in place to support robust convection.

Overall, I think both the southern and northern modes have their own conditional factors, and, despite an impressive parameter space, these areas of interest aren't slam-dunks as far as forecasting goes. As @ColdFront mentioned, kinematics are an important part of this equation. The main conditional factor with the Missouri and Ohio Valley region is time - a relatively short convective window before the front sweeps through and takes kinematics and thermodynamics with it, and likelihood that things will grow upscale rapidly. One one hand, with this kind of setup, you can have a 3/14/25 situation with a line of supercells, or you can have convection that never really gets going before it goes QLCS. On the southern end of things, in the Lower Mississippi Valley and Tennessee Valley, it becomes more of a question of areal coverage and convective evolution. There, favorable kinematics will be in place for an extended period, all the way through the morning on Tuesday. What forms and where will be a deciding factor in the ultimate outcome of this system over the Deep South. It's very possible little to nothing occurs in the Southeast until well into the overnight as well, but the LLJ will be supporting convective development at that point.
9joeZEK.png
huoi4qz.png

4iBZgKH.png
21Iqdsr.png

fcdfMrB.png
wHUeoCU.png
 
I actually don’t quite see the bi-model configuration with this set up. Looking at the storm mode across all global models, the entire dryline convects with no breaks in-between.
Looking at the upper levels, this jet streak configuration supports no such bi-model set up.

This potential vorticity streamer circled in blue shows up on all models, and is quite clearly causing a strong forcing mechanism for Monday throughout the entire warm sector, (maximized in the northern region).

As of now, it seems this day is more like an amped up May 15/16, 2025, where you had an initially very discrete storm mode which slowly transitioned into a squall-line though out the event, with some OWS storms out in front.
 
I actually don’t quite see the bi-model configuration with this set up. Looking at the storm mode across all global models, the entire dryline convects with no breaks in-between.
Looking at the upper levels, this jet streak configuration supports no such bi-model set up.

This potential vorticity streamer circled in blue shows up on all models, and is quite clearly causing a strong forcing mechanism for Monday throughout the entire warm sector, (maximized in the northern region).

As of now, it seems this day is more like an amped up May 15/16, 2025, where you had an initially very discrete storm mode which slowly transitioned into a squall-line though out the event, with some OWS storms out in front.

I'd rather not a 5/15 or 5/16/25 event :/. I asked abt the dates cuz I forgot but I 1000% do not want those day to incur again :/.
 
Last edited:
ASTORP explicitly has a 15% tor risk already for Monday.

Can't upload images but to see it this intense of a signal this far out is concerning.
Is there a link you can share here in lieu of images? If so, I think that would also be greatly appreciated.:)
 
Back
Top