Rochelle was not as violent as Vilonia. I'll revise that. But it was SOLIDLY an F5/EF5 by all reasonable metrics. In one subdivision particular, it utterly destroyed and swept away large, well-built houses with concrete basements. That destruction included obliterating anchor-bolted subfloors. There was grass scouring and wind-rowing to a substantial degree and, FAMOUSLY, a poured concrete walkway was dislodged and shifted (which is insane!). In this area, that tornado satisfied the reasonable standard for the highest rating of extreme contextual damage + devastation to reasonably well built homes.
Rochelle was not a "high-end" F5, but it was definitely a legitimate one. I am sure there are folks here with a good collection of Rochelle damage pics.
Remember: the NWS rated this thing at 200 MPH but not EF5, or something like that. It was an extremely confusing decision.
I also disagree that Mayfield was as strong as Vilonia especially, but that's another story. The pictures posted are a good reminder of Vilonia's remarkable intensity. The standard take is that Mayfield's high contextual violence and reasonably well-built homes rarely coincided. That is DEFINITELY not the case with Vilonia.
Edit: Don't forget Chapman. The contextual support with that one was simply overwhelming.