Ozonelayer
Member
- Messages
- 507
- Location
- Pennsylvania
Hmmm... I don't know what to make of the analogs here. I see that 1974 is in there on the supercell side of things.View attachment 40165
SARS analogs from NW Missouri at 21Z on the 28th. Courtesy of the 06z GFS.
Neither do I, but I don't like the 65% TOR in pink, which I assume is the amount of analogs that produced tornadoes.Hmmm... I don't know what to make of the analogs here. I see that 1974 is in there on the supercell side of things.
I agree. I mean that hodograph shows tornado potential, but it's not even close to being 1974 violent. Helicity numbers don't seem that impressive either.Hmmm... I don't know what to make of the analogs here. I see that 1974 is in there on the supercell side of things.
Also, I cannot wait for some click bait WX account to see the Super Outbreak of '74 in the analogue system and try and say that a repeat of '74 is coming next Monday.View attachment 40165
SARS analogs from NW Missouri at 21Z on the 28th. Courtesy of the 06z GFS.
Full sounding below:
View attachment 40166
Yeah, the SRH doesn't seem too impressive, CAPE seems really decent though, 2000-3000 J/Kg is being shown in the sounding. But the SRH and the hodograph doesn't seem to really match. Don't think it'll even be close to 1974 but the fact that its one of the top analogs had definitely earned this event my attention regardless.I agree. I mean that hodograph shows tornado potential, but it's not even close to being 1974 violent. Helicity numbers don't seem that impressive either.
Oh definitely. CAPE numbers are there, including 3CAPE. The questions I have, is will there be enough SRH to kick the tornado gear into motion to truly make this an "all hazards event." So far, I haven't been that impressed, but SO MUCH can change in six days.Yeah, the SRH doesn't seem too impressive, CAPE seems really decent though, 2000-3000 J/Kg is being shown in the sounding. But the SRH and the hodograph doesn't seem to really match. Don't think it'll even be close to 1974 but the fact that its one of the top analogs had definitely earned this event my attention regardless.
Yeah, a lot can change in 6 days. I will say though, if the shear and helicity can get its act together and show up in even moderate numbers, then the CAPE, 3CAPE, decent lapse rates, and more might form a significant day. However, as of now, all we can do is wait. There is still many questions that need to be answered before I start calling this a significant setup.Oh definitely. CAPE numbers are there, including 3CAPE. The questions I have, is will there be enough SRH to kick the tornado gear into motion to truly make this an "all hazards event." So far, I haven't been that impressed, but SO MUCH can change in six days.
That sounding is actually from Montgomery Alabama on 4/3/74. Which was removed from the better parameters and action to the north. It would be like a southern Georgia sounding from 4/27/11.I agree. I mean that hodograph shows tornado potential, but it's not even close to being 1974 violent. Helicity numbers don't seem that impressive either.
Ah, that makes a lot more sense now. Appreciate the clarification.That sounding is actually from Montgomery Alabama on 4/3/74. Which was removed from the better parameters and action to the north. It would be like a southern Georgia sounding from 4/27/11.
If you see a BNA sounding from 4/3/74, that’s a different story.
No problem. I’ve seen that particular sounding pop up here and there the past few Aprils. One exact time I can cite was from the April 4, 2023 lead up, and I believe March 31, 2023 as well.Ah, that makes a lot more sense now. Appreciate the clarification.
Sh**..