Kory
Member
- Messages
- 4,928
- Location
- Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Probably after 3am in the Western part of the state and then moving NE through time.Kory, what hours are you thinking for Saturday morning in Alabama? Thanks!
Probably after 3am in the Western part of the state and then moving NE through time.Kory, what hours are you thinking for Saturday morning in Alabama? Thanks!
There isn't much the GFS handles properly.Just looked at the 12z runs I think the GFS is struggling with handling some of the max vorts we see rotating. That's why the surface low jumps around a bit...which will ultimately determine the mesocale features. NAM seems to have a better handle...all in all I am noticing more agreement on the synoptic setup, but some of the low level features vary widely. However, even with the nam, I am not sure it is handling the kinematic fields correctly given the very deep stacked low. Lapse rates and shear could very well end up higher over a larger area. Low level shear is still in question at times. However, if you just look at the amount of instability (for January) and the synoptic setup, it has an ugly look especially for Miss, Ala, GA, and north FL for the weekend.
There isn't much the GFS handles properly.
Wish they could improve that.There isn't much the GFS handles properly.
My radar shows tvs sig NE of Selma AL
Is North AL out of the woods?
NAM is absolutely nasty verbatim on the 00z....especially for Southern AL and FL Panhandle Saturday night/Sunday morning. It came in with a bit strong LLJ and the thermos are ridiculous (and likely overdone). But wow....it continues advertising the 1/2 punch early Saturday, then Saturday night/Sunday.
Very welcome Scott. I thought we might be out the outer edges, but the latest NAM seems a slight more northward threat now, but we'll see.thank u for answering my question Tim!
just based on 0z nam, I think at least enh. risk is warranted The biggest unknown is how/if the earlier convection may contaminate the environment for lateris it possible SPC will go with a enhanced risk?