Geno
Member
- Messages
- 111
- Location
- Tuscaloosa
Although at this point, it's better to look at the Convection Allowing Models, in my view. The ensemble models average the banding that they predict develops, so this could result in a much wider band of snowy precipitation than what actually develops (ie, one model in the ensemble has the band further north, another further south, and both show up as averaged out on the SREF or NBM).SREF is better for pinpointing smaller-scale features, the NBM general trends.
What does that mean to people who don't speak weather?High is backing off somewhat.
It potentially means a further north extent of the low pressure and therefore the snow. But the models aren't yet showing that consistently. Or at all.What does that mean to people who don't speak weather?
Just one of the variables involved, so we pay attention to it before a system. We look for variables that are different from what the models said they would be to try to adjust forecasts. In this case, it means what wx_guy said - potentially further north low pressure if the high pressure to the north is not as strong as forecast. I've had a problem believing that it will be so far south - it's pretty rare - but the models completely believe it.What does that mean to people who don't speak weather?
Very well said. Josh Johnson at WFSA mentioned this yesterday, and I think it's worth throwing into the mix here: This low is forming in the Gulf as we speak, and an interesting/unfortunate aspect of that is we lack data in the Gulf! Except for random buoys, there is no real observational data consistently there like there is on land masses. So the models are kinda sorta playing their best guessing game until they can begin assimilating land-based data into the mix. And with it so rare that a winter storm forms this far south (probably has nil or almost nil records in the historical record in the modern computing era), the models are really probably REALLY putting on their best poker face for a little bit. I think they'll turn out 90% correct and I think most mets trust the models generally. But that 10% leaves a lot of room for intrigue.Just one of the variables involved, so we pay attention to it before a system. We look for variables that are different from what the models said they would be to try to adjust forecasts. In this case, it means what wx_guy said - potentially further north low pressure if the high pressure to the north is not as strong as forecast. I've had a problem believing that it will be so far south - it's pretty rare - but the models completely believe it.
How?Nam looks like trouble for i20.