Juliett Bravo Kilo
Member
Been reading through the booklet F5-F6 tornadoes by Grazulis and came across a couple intriguing things that I wanted to discuss one.
One, this tidbit about Winfield, KS of 1991:
The bit about the home being so obliterated that it was missed by surveyors is something I've always seen associated with Kellerville, looks like this is the tornado that this actually originated with.
This bit:
I hope Grazulis isn't one of those who thinks that Jarrell was an F3 or that this logic was used by certain people to make the claim Jarrell was simply an F3 that was able to do what it did simply by being stationary for several minutes.
This is a tornado I'd love to find more info about:
I think this is the earliest tornado that Grazulis considers can be verified as F5 with the available evidence, but not entirely sure. He gives the Natchez, MS tornado and the Camanche, IA tornado F4 ratings.
Also, the Waverly, LA/Inverness MS tornado of the 1971 Delta Outbreak is given an F5 rating in this book, whereas in Significant Tornadoes he has it ranked F4. Not sure if typo or not, but interesting to notice.
One, this tidbit about Winfield, KS of 1991:
The bit about the home being so obliterated that it was missed by surveyors is something I've always seen associated with Kellerville, looks like this is the tornado that this actually originated with.
This bit:
I hope Grazulis isn't one of those who thinks that Jarrell was an F3 or that this logic was used by certain people to make the claim Jarrell was simply an F3 that was able to do what it did simply by being stationary for several minutes.
This is a tornado I'd love to find more info about:
I think this is the earliest tornado that Grazulis considers can be verified as F5 with the available evidence, but not entirely sure. He gives the Natchez, MS tornado and the Camanche, IA tornado F4 ratings.
Also, the Waverly, LA/Inverness MS tornado of the 1971 Delta Outbreak is given an F5 rating in this book, whereas in Significant Tornadoes he has it ranked F4. Not sure if typo or not, but interesting to notice.