Whether it produced F5 damage or not, the documentation of the Hudsonville tornado is arguably its most impressive characteristic. I would say that it was one of the most photographed tornadoes of its time. There are at least 30 photographs (from a variety of vantage points) of the tornado that I can find on the internet, some color. This is in addition to color film footage, which is essentially unheard of for tornadoes prior to the 1960's. More photos of the tornado probably exist elsewhere, and I've seen at least 60 photos of the damage as well. Is there any tornado prior to 1956 that even comes close to being as completely documented as Hudsonville?I was reading the EJSSM paper on the April 3, 1956 tornado outbreak, and Grazulis had some interesting things to say in his review of it.
View attachment 12482
View attachment 12483
yesterdays tornadoes werent really super impressive but still...surprisingly lethal for a highly visible day light wedge....
Sure thing. Will post all the photos I have soon,@buckeye05 I was wondering if you would be able to share any additional photos of incredible damage from Vilonia. I'm looking into it for my own personal research and would really appreciate any help.
Yes the rating for Winterset is well-deserved.okay the winterset tornado has now been rated low end ef4..........do y'all agree with that?
im guessing the house it swept away was well built....
Yes, the rating seems valid to meokay the winterset tornado has now been rated low end ef4..........do y'all agree with that?
Multiple homes were swept away, and it looks like at least one or two were reasonably well-built. EF4 seems like the right call.i havent seen very much even ef3 damage apart from that one house a few trees and other sporactic damage. am i missing something? how well built was that swept home???
Here is one of themwho has good pictures of that one slabbed home?