warneagle
Member
Double funnel! Wow.
Reminds me of the Cullman tornado.Last image before the tower cam went down...
View attachment 16048
Looks like it took out the power to their cam. The way that went from a little wispy funnel to a large cone in the space of a couple of minutes reminded me of Cullman.
These are gonna be low-topped cells so you're not gonna get big hail the way you do with a higher-topped warm season supercell. Typical of high-shear modest-CAPE cold season events where the moist layer is pretty shallow.It is interesting that neither the large hail or significant severe winds are forecast by the SPC.
Oh jeez.
Yep. TORs don't read maps.I assume the MOD Risk extends into the extreme SW portion of BMX CWA but BMX hasn't updated its threats map since 327 am CST. But this super heavy rain should alleviate the BHM area from a severe weather threat. BMX has even 1/5 south of BHM.
Of note, the Fultondale Jan 2021 EF3 formed in a Marginal Risk updated to Slight just before the event began. And the March 2020 Nashville EF3 was Slight & the EF4 just east was only in Marginal & 2% Tornado threat. So you don't need 3/5+ risks for individual strong to even violent tornadoes.
Hattiesburg EF4 was a slight back when there was no enhanced. 10% hatched for tornadoes that day in a small area that ended up supporting the tornado. Looking at the New Iberia tornado though, I think we are going to see some significant tornadoes today.I assume the MOD Risk extends into the extreme SW portion of BMX CWA but BMX hasn't updated its threats map since 327 am CST. But this super heavy rain should alleviate the BHM area from a severe weather threat. BMX has even 1/5 south of BHM.
Of note, the Fultondale Jan 2021 EF3 formed in a Marginal Risk updated to Slight just before the event began. And the March 2020 Nashville EF3 was Slight & the EF4 just east was only in Marginal & 2% Tornado threat. So you don't need 3/5+ risks for individual strong to even violent tornadoes.