• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Severe Weather 3/4 - 3/8

WeathermanLeprechaun said:
I do admittedly agree and as good as it is seeing those sometimes insightful posts. The place is an absolute cesshole. It isn't bad to be posting the tor warnings, but anything about what a certain chaser thinks we can do that ourselves. I don't want to come across harsh to @Kds86z and I don't like to be harsh but these posts do clog some of the more in depth/insightful posts made. It's nothing bad to post if a tornado warning has been issued but the chaser opinions should probably keep out of it. There's a reason I migrated to this platform mostly for weather talk because a lot of the community have no patience/sense for events and scream FCAD anytime an event underperforms.
Click to expand...
So no chaser opinions? Some are forecasts though, also legit Mets. I agree with the overhyping though from some.
 
Kds86z said:
Ignore me if ya need @ColdFront :) I agree constant Twitter posts can disrupt conversation about storms/tornadoes.

I am just a bit zealous in tornado season and I know some people don’t have an X account so if they need to know info I am doing it for any of those. If there was a tornado outbreak I would not be posting every single tornado warning because that would clog thread.
@MidTNWx
Click to expand...
Chaser opinions aren't exactly "info" but I don't mind if you post any particular post that is valid and insightful on the threat itself. Such as a well known meteorologist outlining the areas of interest/time it will hit, or once again any tornado warnings (like you said, not EVERY one but) really. Even stuff like about the environment and how it's evolving. That's what I would consider fair posting. You have good intentions
 
Kds86z said:
So no chaser opinions? Some are forecasts though, also legit Mets. I agree with the overhyping though from some.
Click to expand...
I mean, like @ColdFront said, if you want to know what etc etc chaser thinks, you could go to X but chasers are known for bias in setups and you know how certain chasers get whenever they see a Oklahoma setup "BIG TIME WEDGES!?"

A lot of chaser opinions play off adrenaline and some tend to overdo it.

Good point about some chasers being legit Mets, i do not mind that. The overhyping is too much though on that platform
 
I have no trouble going back and deleting multiple posts and I have done so. So I hope this thread will be a little less long to catch up on. I have gone back 10 plus pages. I’m no forecasting pro, relaying info is all I got. The pic upload is broke also, so hence more reliance on X. You would’ve seen less X posts.
 
Last edited:
KakashiHatake2000 said:
regardless of rating still quite pretty devastating for Michigan
Click to expand...

Also worth noting that if this tornado is upgraded, it would be one of the first times I can ever recall that a season’s first intense+ tornado was an EF4. Not often do you get violent tornadoes this early into the season.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top