KakashiHatake2000
Member
- Messages
- 522
- Location
- Southern United States
i guess so it was sort of like slightly above average but im not sureJust a tad…
i guess so it was sort of like slightly above average but im not sureJust a tad…
yeah i know pretty crazySome pretty impressive scouring there.
I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that by extension we will once again see a violent plains tornado rated EF3.
EF3 145 is what I've been saying all day; we'll see if that's what it's rated. Wouldn't doubt it, especially since drone video reaffirms my thought that nothing it hit seemed particularly well-built.I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that by extension we will once again see a violent plains tornado rated EF3.
Of course that is quite apparent.I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that by extension we will once again see a violent plains tornado rated EF3.
I recall Reed predicting June to be quite active at the beginning of the month. It seems like that’s verified.
It’s crazy to think we’re only below 2011 given that we never really had that one huge outbreak day like a 3-31-2023 or a sustained two week sequence of outbreaks like we’ve seen in other big years.
i dont remember how many reed was calculating how many tornadoes he was planning on capturing but yeah he definitely verified the forecast with an active juneI recall Reed predicting June to be quite active at the beginning of the month. It seems like that’s verified.
It’s crazy to think we’re only below 2011 given that we never really had that one huge outbreak day like a 3-31-2023 or a sustained two week sequence of outbreaks like we’ve seen in other big years.
There have been a lot of serious issues the way tornadoes have been rated from 2003 to 2006 using the F-SCALE and 2014 to present using the EF-SCALE. Guess what NWS offices don't care nor is anything going to be done about it as they think we know nothing.If that’s rated EF3, then we got a serious issue. That was NOT an EF3.