Yeah I have to agree now that Matador is pretty much in "contextual EF5" territory, but there hasn't been one of those since Rainsville.
El Reno 11 was also rated by unregular DI and contexual along with raxpol radar data. There wasn't any house rated EF5 along path. Btw, there were lots of houses on its path were swept away, some without any significant debris nearby. But we don't know the details of construction by now.Yeah I have to agree now that Matador is pretty much in "contextual EF5" territory, but there hasn't been one of those since Rainsville.
Those concrete bollards being snapped and blown over is wild. I've never seen that beforeSome damage details from DG, parking lot was removed and broken, concrete pillars was broken near ground level.
View attachment 20827View attachment 20828View attachment 20829View attachment 20830
I noticed that shots from around the Dollar General, including the aerial shot in this post, show the ground being really muddy and seemingly stripped of grass on both sides of the road around the destroyed structures. Is that from vehicles, or was that actually heavy ground scouring?
Pardon my ignorance, but what's a QRT and what's the implications of this?
tbh, damage wise, I think it's not weaker than any tornado in plain since Moore 2013, including Chapman and Pilger. It's pretty interesting to me that why the tds height of this tornado was that low(6-7kft). I can't think of any case similar to this.So is it safe to say that this was likely the strongest plains tornado in quite awhile?
It had such an unassuming radar presentation yet it produced extremely rare violent damage featstbh, damage wise, I think it's not weaker than any tornado in plain since Moore 2013. It's pretty interesting to me that why the tds height of this tornado was that low(6-7kft). I can't think of any case similar to this.
A QRT is usually needed to confirm/analyze violent tornado damage and take ratings above an EF3-level.Pardon my ignorance, but what's a QRT and what's the implications of this?
I guess I wouldn't be too surprised.A QRT is usually needed to confirm/analyze violent tornado damage and take ratings above an EF3-level.
This is kind of making me think they may slap a high-end EF3 rating on it and call it a day, which would be quite unfortunate for science.
Not nessecarily…both rolling fork and keota were rating appropriately without a qrt im pretty sureA QRT is usually needed to confirm/analyze violent tornado damage and take ratings above an EF3-level.
This is kind of making me think they may slap a high-end EF3 rating on it and call it a day, which would be quite unfortunate for science.
Oh, I didn't know that. So there is still hope it gets done correctly then!Not nessecarily…both rolling fork and keota were rating appropriately without a qrt im pretty sure
Unless you mean canton then idk what lol…In the absolutely ludicrous chance that the survey teams just ends up slapping the dreaded high end ef3 label like they’ve had with many other Texas tornadoes, (ahem, canton) then this would probably end up being the most egregious case since you know what.
As far as surveys overall go, one word: ViloniaUnless you mean canton then idk what lol…
Ah yes.As far as surveys overall go, one word: Vilonia
Although the 2006 Westminster "F3" would draw immediate parallels...
If only all survey offices were like nws Jackson. (Cough, rolling fork is the very best survey of a violent city destroying tornado since Moore, cough)The lack of QRT is making me nervous though. Already bracing for a botched survey where they go with the absolute minimum windspeed that the structures could have conceivably failed at, while ignoring all the contextual damage that is screaming "high-end violent tornado".
Imagine if this thing gets rated EF3, with Caviness and Clarksville from last year being rated EF4, despite one of those two being based on a single house that wasn't even anchor bolted. I'm probably letting cynicism get the best of me, but sometimes I just have no faith in the people who are supposed to be the experts.