Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
And just north of that tooThe new line of cells forming is looking healthy. Tight couplet on one already.
View attachment 7155
The new line of cells forming is looking healthy. Tight couplet on one already.
View attachment 7155
Doubt it. It's a Nimbus digital thermometer from the NWS. It gets checked twice a year. I'm a co-op observer. I will be interested to see other reports from the area this morning. Muscle Shoals only made it to 68 at 9:45 PM.Something might be wrong with your thermometer. What kind of weather station do you have? All the reputable observations I see in the Shoals are between 61-64 degrees.
That's a fair point, and also we had the good fortune that most of the storms reached their apparent peak intensity over relatively unpopulated areas. There weren't many direct hits on towns. Not often we have a day with that many tornadoes where we get that lucky.One thing about yesterday, is that nearly all of the apparently strongest tornadoes seemed to occur in bad radar holes. Any impressive couplets/TDS's were generally transient, which was partially a function of storm behavior but also of most of those tornadoes that were more significant tending to be far from any NEXRAD sites. I know I for one was expecting at least a couple of long-lasting, jaw-dropping hooks w/debris balls/>200kt GTG couplets/CC drops yesterday. Yes, the event underwhelmed a bit but you're also not going to see radar signatures like that, even for a scan or two, if the beam is hitting the storm at 9,000 feet.
I think that's a part of where the "bust" perception tends to come from.
Yes we did get very lucky for the most part. Don’t get me wrong. there were VERY impress TDS and debris balls in some storms. Most storms did produce a tornado and had a violent signature, but didn’t hit a major town, I have a feeling Selma will have major damage, along with chilton and laurelThat's a fair point, and also we had the good fortune that most of the storms reached their apparent peak intensity over relatively unpopulated areas. There weren't many direct hits on towns. Not often we have a day with that many tornadoes where we get that lucky.
Agree there. Storms just didn’t get enough space apart get true discrete signature . More semi discrete. That lowered the strong violent tornado chance there aloneBased on what i saw yesterday, if these tornadoes with the intense radar signatures hit anything at peak, i’d doubt they would get anything lower than a EF2. The Chilton tornado seems to be the most plausible EF4. Selma is one i want to see pics of. Anyways, I wouldn’t call yesterday a “ BUST “ but i’d say the 45 percent was the wrong call.
We have a moderate risk for the carolinas today. wonder if it will bustAgree there. Storms just didn’t get enough space apart get true discrete signature . More semi discrete. That lowered the strong violent tornado chance there alone
I think it's fair to say tornado activity in most parts of MS bust. The second round of the activity which was predicted to be the main show of the day bust without a doubt. The first round verified quite good. I watched yesterday's CAM's presentation constantly and It seems to me that they change the storm mode quite frequently through the D1. The foreseeable uncertainty of the storm mode of this event was obvious.One thing about yesterday, is that nearly all of the apparently strongest tornadoes seemed to occur in bad radar holes. Any impressive couplets/TDS's were generally transient, which was partially a function of storm behavior but also of most of those tornadoes that were more significant tending to be far from any NEXRAD sites. I know I for one was expecting at least a couple of long-lasting, jaw-dropping hooks w/debris balls/>200kt GTG couplets/CC drops yesterday. Yes, the event underwhelmed a bit but you're also not going to see radar signatures like that, even for a scan or two, if the beam is hitting the storm at 9,000 feet.
I think that's a part of where the "bust" perception tends to come from.
Yes the first round in Mississippi had a lot of violent looking tornadoes ( Mainly Laurel )I think it's fair to say tornado activity in most parts of MS bust. The second round of the activity which was predicted to be the main show of the day bust without a doubt. The first round verified quite good. I watched yesterday's CAM's presentation constantly and It seems to me that they change the storm mode quite frequently through the D1. The foreseeable uncertainty of the storm mode of this event was obvious.
There were only three tornado reports in entire MS. I know there can be more tornados after the survey. But "a lot of violent looking tornados in MS" seems a little exaggerated to me. I don't think tornados near laurel can be violent based on the radar and damage we see now. 2019/12/16 had way more tornado reports and long trackers than yesterday in MS obviously and it was just an ENH. I have no mean to blame SPC, the high risk was a very good call. The CAM's presentation of this event wasn't particularly good to say at least.Yes the first round in Mississippi had a lot of violent looking tornadoes ( Mainly Laurel )
Yeah. I actually forgot about that outbreak lol. anyways we really don’t know if it busted in terms of damage, we will have to wait. the outbreak is far from over. Moderate risk for carolinasThere were only three tornado reports in entire MS. I know there can be more tornados after the survey. But "a lot of violent looking tornados in MS" seems a little exaggerated to me. I don't think tornados near laurel can be violent based on the radar and damage we see now. 2019/12/16 had way more tornado reports and long trackers than yesterday in MS obviously and it was just an ENH. I have no mean to blame SPC, the high risk was a very good call. The CAM's presentation of this event wasn't particularly good to say at least.