• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

January 23-25th Winter Wx

i look forward to the euro dropping mid 80s on central AL tonight. give it a few hours and we’ll have gone from an icy grave to a tropical paradise on january 24th

reed timmer massive wedge tornado *slight* hyperbole loading.
I mean - not far from. Line of thunderstorms anyone? Trip to the beach in shorts?
1769015112992.png


The GFS has FL panhandle temps in the mid 70s during the CAD-fueled ice storm in GA.

1769015930769.png
It's all about the track of the low.
 
Last edited:

I mean - not far from. Line of thunderstorms anyone? Trip to the beach in shorts?
View attachment 50087


The GFS has FL panhandle temps in the mid 70s during the CAD-fueled ice storm in GA.

View attachment 50089
It's all about the track of the low.
Makes you wonder how much modeling even helps, if expectations can range from ice storm to thunderstorms within a few runs
 

DbSZJ3c.jpg
 
And bham sitting at... <checks map>

...62 on that... lol

I'm not sure this scenario makes the most sense, but I'll take it if it happens.
 
Last edited:
Makes you wonder how much modeling even helps, if expectations can range from ice storm to thunderstorms within a few runs
Which is why the track of the low is key. You can, and often do, have major tornado outbreaks in the warm sector of a storm system and on the northwestern side have large blizzards.

The reason it’s flipping like that is because it’s displaying the effect the low placement is having on the areas.
 
Makes you wonder how much modeling even helps, if expectations can range from ice storm to thunderstorms within a few runs
As someone who has been watching these systems for decades as models came into existence - they absolutely help. These systems are like unicorns though - rare enough that the models really don't have as much to work with in terms of analogs, so they struggle with the same factors the humans do - lots of variables to consider. But do computers GREATLY help attempting to take all those variables into account? Absolutely.
 
As someone who has been watching these systems for decades as models came into existence - they absolutely help. These systems are like unicorns though - rare enough that the models really don't have as much to work with in terms of analogs, so they struggle with the same factors the humans do - lots of variables to consider. But do computers GREATLY help attempting to take all those variables into account? Absolutely.
Yeah, it gives you a parameter of what COULD happen. Just frustration from a snow-lover originally from New York in Texas though o_O
 
If runs stay like that, there's a sneaky line for maybe some small svr threat in SE AL. This is all dependant on the low however and things may trend again to how they were jsut yesterday. It's brutal to try forecast winter systems, especially one of this magnitude
 
If runs stay like that, there's a sneaky line for maybe some small svr threat in SE AL. This is all dependant on the low however and things may trend again to how they were jsut yesterday. It's brutal to try forecast winter systems, especially one of this magnitude
Watch northwest Alabama have a absolute ice storm and then southeast Alabama have tornadoes lol
 
Which is why the track of the low is key. You can, and often do, have major tornado outbreaks in the warm sector of a storm system and on the northwestern side have large blizzards.

The reason it’s flipping like that is because it’s displaying the effect the low placement is having on the areas.

I'm not at all convinced in the modeling of the low track. If we really do get a flatter system, it's not going to track that far up and then reform off the carolina coast on the other side of the CAD, it will take the path of least resistance across N FL/ S GA, under the CAD, not barrel through or north of the high. Could be that it's one low crashing against the high and another forming off the coast, but I really wonder about that solution. Seems a bit too extreme to be correct, but maybe I'm just questioning the sigh of relief that I'm no longer under the gun. That one prediction being off just slightly will make all the difference in this system though.
 
Back
Top