Kory
Member
- Messages
- 4,928
- Location
- Tuscaloosa, Alabama
MDT out for ARKLATEX tomorrow.
Correct that is VBV (veer back veer) but that’s way up in the wind profile. If it’s concentrated in the mid levels 500-700mb, then it’s more problematic and favors upscale linear growth of convection.Just looked at the 12z NAM and I would say things might be getting a little more "interesting" for North GA early into late evening on Sat.
The attached forecast sounding is for near Lake Lanier at 03z Sun. Models also show the broken line moving thru the area at that time with a forecast STP of 2.2. Also forecasted CAPE around 700.
Only odd thing are the winds between 9-12km.... is that what they call veer back?
Correct that is VBV (veer back veer) but that’s way up in the wind profile. If it’s concentrated in the mid levels 500-700mb, then it’s more problematic and favors upscale linear growth of convection.
I’m not seeing any issues with the wind profile further east on Saturday. Most actually look quite nice ahead of the QLCS in most of Mississippi and Alabama into Georgia. The trough begins swinging negative tilt which veers the mid level winds. I think if we can get a warm sector that’s modeled on the WRF guidance, there will be a solid tornado threat AHEAD of the QLCS.Yeah, my thinking about the veer-back putting a ceiling on portions of this event has been with the soundings showing it between 850-500mb. Way high up it isn't too much of an issue.
Instability will be greater there but shear profiles should be more optimum further north closer to the surface low where low level winds will likely be more backed.Early CAM output suggests the greatest supercell tornado threat with this event will be over southern MS/AL and the Florida Panhandle Saturday afternoon/evening, with lines up well with the forecast soundings and my thinking since yesterday that the most favorable shear profiles will be there.
Looooong time lurker here but have learned so much from this site, I’ve lived through plenty big OK tornadoes, enough to be totally freaked out anytime something as bad as this storm hits. That being said I’m in shreveport and have the opportunity to head south of I-10 near the coast of LA early tomorrow morning to a relatives house. Should I drive down or hunker down in Shreve? I’ve been prepared to hunker down for the last week. No storm shelter, just a nice big mattress over a bath tub setup in my house. TIA
Looooong time lurker here but have learned so much from this site, I’ve lived through plenty big OK tornadoes, enough to be totally freaked out anytime something as bad as this storm hits. That being said I’m in shreveport and have the opportunity to head south of I-10 near the coast of LA early tomorrow morning to a relatives house. Should I drive down or hunker down in Shreve? I’ve been prepared to hunker down for the last week. No storm shelter, just a nice big mattress over a bath tub setup in my house. TIA
That all depends on how far north the warm sector resches with little or no contamination. Yes, I think it is likely it will be expanded north, especially for damaging wind threat...maybe for tornadoes too ...either way, the threat over that area is significant.Does anyone foresee the enhanced risk getting pulled further north? On some of the graphics I'm pretty much right on the line between enhanced and slight risk. Just wondering how the potential looks for the "sweet spot" to move further north over the Tuscaloosa-Birmingham corridor.
I was just looking through some of the models and I wouldn’t be shocked to see the main area pulled north. This is all predicated on an expansive warm sector ahead of the main line. Looking at the NAM it even has cells out in front of the line.Does anyone foresee the enhanced risk getting pulled further north? On some of the graphics I'm pretty much right on the line between enhanced and slight risk. Just wondering how the potential looks for the "sweet spot" to move further north over the Tuscaloosa-Birmingham corridor.
After looking at the models they seem to be trending up even into my area. Do you think the warm sector will expand far enough north to make it to TN for a tornado threat?That all depends on how far north the warm sector resches with little or no contamination. Yes, I think it is likely it will be expanded north, especially for damaging wind threat...maybe for tornadoes too ...either way, the threat over that area is significant.
After looking at the models they seem to be trending up even into my area. Do you think the warm sector will expand far enough north to make it to TN for a tornado threat?