Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which isn't unique to Beryl. Beryl has defied expectations, but long term track/intensity forecasts are almost always inaccurate.I think the NHC has made it clear in recent discussions on Beryl that no one effing knows what it’s going to do anymore LOL it has defied all odds and expectations and the models can’t agree on how to handle it. Lots of uncertainty in both track and intensity beyond 60 hours.
It does look like that. Let’s see what happens at 5. My guess is down to 140 mphLooks like it's beginning another EWRC. Can anyone confirm?
Ah I see. Could just be the eye tightening up again then.Not EWRC I don't think - eye looks stable on Mimic. Or at least was most recently.
There was quite a lot of vorticity visible from satellite in and around the eyewall as it moved over the island, likely a correct assumption.And of course, Mother Nature decides to spin off a high-end Category 4 landfall in Grenada and earliest Category 5 on record, in the same storm, before the season has really even started...
Anyhow, those damage shots from Cariacou are nasty. I'd be willing to bet money the most severe wind damage (the one that popped into mind is the image of that concrete building literally leveled right next to ones still standing) was caused by so-called "mini swirls". Ted Fujita studied them in the aftermath of Hurricanes Andrew and Iniki, and the research he put into them is so fascinating. These mini swirls are not true tornadoes, as eyewall mesovortices contribute to their formation but the swirls do not connect with any convective cloud bases. In Hurricane Andrew, he estimated that these swirls lasted no more than a second or two, but possibly had wind gusts up to 200 mph.