• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Enhanced Fujita Ratings Debate Thread

ColdFront

Member
Messages
515
Reaction score
1,093
Location
Arctic
Factoring in the speed of the storm would be stupid, because it's literally a part of the tornadic winds. Translational velocity + rotational velocity = the winds from a tornado that impact structures. End of story. It would be duration of said winds that would be in question.
That’s exactly what it was. I mixed up speed vs wind duration trying to recall what was in the presentation posted in this thread. I’ll correct my initial comment.
 

Wind Driven Coconut

Active Member
Messages
35
Reaction score
91
Location
Chuluota, FL
Really good discussion here. After much of the curiosity about final rating for Rolling Fork I started a little curiosity research about how many EF-5 tornadoes would be added to the list if the threshold for EF-5 was lowered to 190 mph. Seems there would be approximately 7 since 2013: Washington, IL, Vilonia, AR, Rochelle, IL, Chapman, KS, Mayfield, KY, and Rolling Fork (possible Bassfield but I could not find a final windspeed on that one).

I’m sure it’s way too simple of a solution to simply lower the threshold for EF5 attain ability, which is obviously more likely to be achieved in smaller towns simply by looking at the small sample size above, but the flip side is that currently there is a six level scale that exists to determine tornado strength in which apparently the highest level on that scale is unachievable in 98% of all cases. That makes no sense to me either.
 
Messages
2,416
Reaction score
3,492
Location
Madison, WI
Really good discussion here. After much of the curiosity about final rating for Rolling Fork I started a little curiosity research about how many EF-5 tornadoes would be added to the list if the threshold for EF-5 was lowered to 190 mph. Seems there would be approximately 7 since 2013: Washington, IL, Vilonia, AR, Rochelle, IL, Chapman, KS, Mayfield, KY, and Rolling Fork (possible Bassfield but I could not find a final windspeed on that one).

I’m sure it’s way too simple of a solution to simply lower the threshold for EF5 attain ability, which is obviously more likely to be achieved in smaller towns simply by looking at the small sample size above, but the flip side is that currently there is a six level scale that exists to determine tornado strength in which apparently the highest level on that scale is unachievable in 98% of all cases. That makes no sense to me either.

In practice, seems to be more like 99.998% of all cases.
 

Wind Driven Coconut

Active Member
Messages
35
Reaction score
91
Location
Chuluota, FL
In practice, seems to be more like 99.998% of all cases.
Admittedly, I was being generous :)

The EF5 unicorn status should be applied for other rating systems as well:
Cat 6 hurricane - winds above 275 mph
KBB Used Car Rating - add “never owned” to the Condition question
6th star for Amazon ratings for exemplary service - but gray out the option so it can’t be selected.

Yes all of the above are silly, but how is it any different than having a 6th level of intensity for a tornado that can no longer be achieved short of a “lottery odds” hit on the one place in any city where the construction was good enough to make that determination?

Since it does seem much more possible at 190, seems a very easy fix, and the number of tornadoes that would be added in the last 10 years (seven) is pretty much on par with the average prior to this new approach.
 

wasatch

Member
Messages
14
Reaction score
27
Location
Syracuse, UT
I think one of the Pilger tornadoes was rated 190 also... in theory I think you'd also have to bump Tuscaloosa (perhaps some other 4/27 ones?) and one or two of the 5/24/11 OK high EF4's to EF5...
 

pohnpei

Member
Messages
899
Reaction score
1,802
Location
shanghai
Really good discussion here. After much of the curiosity about final rating for Rolling Fork I started a little curiosity research about how many EF-5 tornadoes would be added to the list if the threshold for EF-5 was lowered to 190 mph. Seems there would be approximately 7 since 2013: Washington, IL, Vilonia, AR, Rochelle, IL, Chapman, KS, Mayfield, KY, and Rolling Fork (possible Bassfield but I could not find a final windspeed on that one).

I’m sure it’s way too simple of a solution to simply lower the threshold for EF5 attain ability, which is obviously more likely to be achieved in smaller towns simply by looking at the small sample size above, but the flip side is that currently there is a six level scale that exists to determine tornado strength in which apparently the highest level on that scale is unachievable in 98% of all cases. That makes no sense to me either.
The wind speed for Bassfield was 190mph and Pilger 2014 was 191mph. Chapman was 200mph in ncdc but still 180mph in nws website.
 

andyhb

Member
Messages
903
Reaction score
2,325
Location
Norman, OK
Today is the day we get endlessly reminded that it’s been 10 years since an EF5 whilst fully knowing that that’s simply not true.
 
Last edited:

andyhb

Member
Messages
903
Reaction score
2,325
Location
Norman, OK


Well this article ought to stir the hornets' nest a bit.

Marshall saying "there's no difference between a high end EF4 and an EF5" is pretty hmmm-worthy when it's obvious that public perception of an event is changed pretty dramatically following a 5.
 
Last edited:

Tanner

Member
Messages
114
Reaction score
177
Location
Granville, MA


Well this article ought to stir the hornets' nest a bit.

Marshall saying "there's no difference between a high end EF4 and an EF5" is pretty hmmm-worthy when it's obvious that public perception of an event is changed pretty dramatically following a 5.

Yeah, I mean the title says it all. We have "changed the way we rate tornadoes" to become more stringent when going above EF4, for whatever reason. It isn't because the philosophy of rating tornadoes has changed, it's the execution and reasoning that has changed. Of course, this relates solely to the fact that after Moore, this apparent shift started to rear its ugly head.

That being said, I like to check in. What tornadoes specifically from the 2010's/20's garner an EF5 rating pre-2013? The blind obvious being Vilonia for most of the census here.
 

TH2002

Member
Messages
2,553
Reaction score
3,575
Location
California, United States
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
That being said, I like to check in. What tornadoes specifically from the 2010's/20's garner an EF5 rating pre-2013? The blind obvious being Vilonia for most of the census here.
I still may have missed a few

2011:
New Wren, Tuscaloosa, Ringgold, Cordova*, Ohatchee*, Chickasha, Goldsby, Berlin*

2012:
Henryville*

2013:
Granbury*, Washington*

2014:
Vilonia, Louisville, Stanton, Pilger*, Pilger East*

2015:
Fairdale, Cisco*, Holly Springs

2016:
Chapman

2017:
Perryville*

2018:
Camp Crook

2020:
Bassfield*

2021:
Mayfield*

*denotes tornadoes that are more debatable, or don't have enough information available.
 

UK_EF4

Member
Messages
492
Reaction score
1,109
Location
NW London
Thought this was an interesting snippet from that article, given Tim Marshall also surveyed Vilonia (though from what I am aware he wasn't shown the most intense damage? - someone correct me if I am wrong).
 

Attachments

  • 1684841608231.png
    1684841608231.png
    47.3 KB · Views: 0

andyhb

Member
Messages
903
Reaction score
2,325
Location
Norman, OK
Thought this was an interesting snippet from that article, given Tim Marshall also surveyed Vilonia (though from what I am aware he wasn't shown the most intense damage? - someone correct me if I am wrong).
None of the most intense damage/potential highest end DIs were in his report.
 

Austin Dawg

Member
Sustaining Member
Messages
778
Reaction score
1,146
Location
Leander, Texas
"there's no difference between a high end EF4 and an EF5"
Despicable Me Reaction GIF
 
Back
Top