WeathermanLeprechaun
Member
TLDR
So..."houses won't get a EF5 rating now, it's too strict!"
Enderlin is rated EF5, but oh, the calcs were off and the research isn't well developed enough. What side do you stand for? Because you are arguing against having better ratings by judging the non-traditional maths ways of things. We need to explore different branches of damage, and having all these extra options helps. Nothing will be perfect ever in this scale. But we have so much that is changing behind closed doors, so give it a bit. The scale is quite literally a "best guess" and best estimation. Who said the calcs were absolutely certain? They'll have flaws but you would be complaining if the NTP + Grand Forks never went through with giving those trains a chance! I don't get it.
You stand and advocate that this scale should be better yet find ways to dump on it with a conservative mindset that it seems a certain Discord holds essentially on that whole side of things.
Discord will never be as blunt as this place and a certain guy has over 10-15 years of researching this stuff, knowing the ins and outs of this scale. Sorry but he has more credentials than half the users on that forum are, and that's not to bump him up, but it's realistically true. You can't handle being blunt, fine. Maybe not everyone is suited for that, but don't scurry off and call certain people jerks
You are allowed to voice your opinions, who said that you couldn't? Yourself. Nobody is being hostile, it's quite literally being straightforward. You are a appreciated user on this forum for your findings, it's not like you are bashed consistently on a daily basis which is what you're making it out to be. I came onto this forum knowing very well that if you have a questionable opinion, you'll be called out for it. We aren't all perfect, we have all been susceptible to it. You just need to learn to take bluntness with them understanding that it is in good intent of only helping you improve your viewpoints and trying to understand. This message is in good intention too. You're a valued user but storming out because you feel like you receive unfair treatment when it's just really your argument has flaws, we've shown those but you've never changed nor conceded on it. Sorry if this is bordering a bit too blunt, but this is TalkWeather. What you see is what you get in return. And also, I'm aware this forum is not looked at as particularly liked on that same Discord. Don't twist the view for them, either if you end up deleting your acc.
So..."houses won't get a EF5 rating now, it's too strict!"
Enderlin is rated EF5, but oh, the calcs were off and the research isn't well developed enough. What side do you stand for? Because you are arguing against having better ratings by judging the non-traditional maths ways of things. We need to explore different branches of damage, and having all these extra options helps. Nothing will be perfect ever in this scale. But we have so much that is changing behind closed doors, so give it a bit. The scale is quite literally a "best guess" and best estimation. Who said the calcs were absolutely certain? They'll have flaws but you would be complaining if the NTP + Grand Forks never went through with giving those trains a chance! I don't get it.
You stand and advocate that this scale should be better yet find ways to dump on it with a conservative mindset that it seems a certain Discord holds essentially on that whole side of things.
Discord will never be as blunt as this place and a certain guy has over 10-15 years of researching this stuff, knowing the ins and outs of this scale. Sorry but he has more credentials than half the users on that forum are, and that's not to bump him up, but it's realistically true. You can't handle being blunt, fine. Maybe not everyone is suited for that, but don't scurry off and call certain people jerks
You are allowed to voice your opinions, who said that you couldn't? Yourself. Nobody is being hostile, it's quite literally being straightforward. You are a appreciated user on this forum for your findings, it's not like you are bashed consistently on a daily basis which is what you're making it out to be. I came onto this forum knowing very well that if you have a questionable opinion, you'll be called out for it. We aren't all perfect, we have all been susceptible to it. You just need to learn to take bluntness with them understanding that it is in good intent of only helping you improve your viewpoints and trying to understand. This message is in good intention too. You're a valued user but storming out because you feel like you receive unfair treatment when it's just really your argument has flaws, we've shown those but you've never changed nor conceded on it. Sorry if this is bordering a bit too blunt, but this is TalkWeather. What you see is what you get in return. And also, I'm aware this forum is not looked at as particularly liked on that same Discord. Don't twist the view for them, either if you end up deleting your acc.
