Welcome to TalkWeather!
We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER
Apologies for no posts for a while. Gonna be a couple weeks before my next tornado re-rating/summary. Getting married this weekend then is the honeymoon! Maybe I'll write one or two while on the beach lol.
The Cullman photos he posted definitely made me go "hmmm..."
The contextual damage including the tree damage, scouring, wind rowing and pickup truck being torn in half and launched over 400 yards definitely convinced me of EF5 intensity.
But still, almost all the photos of homes showed evidence of poor construction. There were satellite views of one or two that looked like they MAY have been well constructed, but I can't say for sure without ground level photos.
Bottom line: I'm honestly still ok with EF4, though it would have undoubtedly achieved an F5 rating back in 1974.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.