• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Severe WX December 10 & 11, 2021 Severe Threat

Messages
647
Reaction score
515
Location
Augusta, Kansas
Not sure if this has been posted yet, but there was an additional EF4 damage point from the first long-tracker added to the DAT by MEG. The structure was a bait & tackle shop that was slabbed near Reelfoot Lake.
1599990
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't that at least a little bit more than complete destruction of the entire building?
 

Austin Dawg

Member
Sustaining Member
Messages
852
Reaction score
1,299
Location
Leander, Texas
I don't know a whole lot about assessing tornado damage but I know what Smithville and and other towns that have been struck by an F5 look like after they were hit. Homes and buildings completely cleared away... trees stripped down to the ground... trenches dug in the ground. I could go on and on but after I heard none of these were rated F5's and now hearing that they have been downgraded from an F4 to an F3 brings a timely image to my mind over and over and over again.


are-you-serious-spiderman.gif
 
Messages
2,755
Reaction score
4,294
Location
Madison, WI
Nah let's just go back to the original Fujita scale. Like the EF scale the TORRO scale puts too much emphasis on homes of "superior construction".

Well, the original scale had its own issues, especially with the earlier ratings that were retroactively applied and again with "La Plata syndrome." You'd think there could be some sort of happy medium between "college students rating tornadoes by poring over newspaper photos/accounts" and this mess, but here we are.
 

TH2002

Member
Sustaining Member
Messages
3,118
Reaction score
4,680
Location
California, United States
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
Well, the original scale had its own issues, especially with the earlier ratings that were retroactively applied and again with "La Plata syndrome." You'd think there could be some sort of happy medium between "college students rating tornadoes by poring over newspaper photos/accounts" and this mess, but here we are.
If I were Ted Fujita I would be rolling in my grave after seeing what the scale named after me has become.
 

pohnpei

Member
Messages
958
Reaction score
1,949
Location
shanghai
Before and after view of an EF4 house near Hayti MO. Some shurbs nearby completely
annihilated. House was clearly not well built.
IMG_20211229_124207.jpgImg_2021-12-29-12-34-19.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20211229_124207.jpg
    IMG_20211229_124207.jpg
    570.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Img_2021-12-29-12-34-19.jpg
    Img_2021-12-29-12-34-19.jpg
    253.4 KB · Views: 0

TH2002

Member
Sustaining Member
Messages
3,118
Reaction score
4,680
Location
California, United States
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
View of that home in Carbondale. Looks like it was leveled but not slabbed.
unknown.png
I guess that question is finally answered and upon reanalysis of the satellite imagery, the slab looks almost "too clean" and all of the debris is in neat piles next to the foundation.
 

buckeye05

Member
Messages
3,121
Reaction score
4,581
Location
Colorado
Actually, that might be the one that had its concrete flooring blown away. Never mind if that’s the case.

Edit: beat me to it
 

pohnpei

Member
Messages
958
Reaction score
1,949
Location
shanghai
After looking at map, the order of these pics from West to East was 2314.
The before view of the first EF4 point of this series which was in bottom pic2.(not direct hit, right side of the funnel) The black SUV in front of the house likely ended up mangled in upper side of pic2.
IMG_20211230_080032.jpg
I'm still wondering whether the yellow lines right side of the third pic was scouring because It didn't look like other clearly legitimate scouring but the before map also didn't look like this as well.
Up close view of this place
Vehicles and other debris piled into the forest.
Img_2021-12-12-09-58-20.jpg
IMG_20211230_072404.jpg
before
IMG_20211230_080746.jpg
Till this day I'm still stunned by the fact that this tornado can manage to intensify into EF5 category near 5Z in December in Kentucky after maintaining over 2 hours already. Apparently either of these aspects have no similar case. It was on its own class talking about rarity.
 
Last edited:

pohnpei

Member
Messages
958
Reaction score
1,949
Location
shanghai
View of that home in Carbondale. Looks like it was leveled but not slabbed.
unknown.png
It was still a strong candidate for high EF4 rating at least. I hope they didn't simply missed It because all the other slabs along this road was labeled and most of them were 165mph. There were still tons of houses not labeled along the path btw.
 

MNTornadoGuy

Member
Messages
1,615
Reaction score
2,570
Location
Apple Valley, MN
After looking at map, the order of these pics from West to East was 2314.
The before view of the first EF4 point of this series which was in bottom pic2.(not direct hit, right side of the funnel) The black SUV in front of the house likely ended up mangled in upper side of pic2.
View attachment 11311
I'm still wondering whether the yellow lines right side of the third pic was scouring because It didn't look like other clearly legitimate scouring but the before map also didn't look like this as well.
Up close view of this place
Vehicles and other debris piled into the forest.
View attachment 11306
View attachment 11309
before
View attachment 11313
Till this day I'm still stunned by the fact that this tornado can manage to intensify into EF5 category near 5Z in December in Kentucky after maintaining over 2 hours already. Apparently either of these aspects have no similar case. It was on its own class talking about rarity.
It's not scouring, it's wind-rowed hay.
 

Sawmaster

Member
Messages
516
Reaction score
660
Location
Pickens SC
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
Why does this house STILL have no DI? Did they just forget it existed?
View attachment 11266

And how the [bleep] is this supposed to be EF4 damage? Unless the rest of the structure was not bolted to the foundation, this is clearly EF5 damage.
View attachment 11267
View attachment 11268
The bottom pic shows both end-nailed studs and the anchor-bolting retrofitted with expanding bolts; not poured-in-place standard anchor bolts. Given these the max rating available would be EF-4.

But what really sucks is that even though these anchor bolts held, if the rest of the structure was up to EF-5 DI's they would almost certainly still rate EF-4 because of the type of anchor bolt used not being "correct" even though these clearly held and did the job adequately. Therein lies the problems of using engineers for damage surveys. I don't know how many of you have had to deal with these people directly but in my 45 years of construction work I've crossed paths with them too many times. And while I don't like to categorize people as there's always exceptions, I have never met an engineer who didn't have a hugely-inflated ego with a side-order of "God complex" thrown in. More than a few times I've shown them obvious errors in their designs and ways to easily do things better but they won't accept it. Yes we do need engineers involved with damage surveys; just not in the capacity and with the authority of how they're being used now. Because of this we're getting incorrect answers to our questions and until we change the approach that will continue.

Phil
 
Last edited:
Back
Top