warneagle
Member
It sounds like they're going to start reopening somethings in DC as long as infection rates don't spike again. Cautiously optimistic. I should at least be able to go back to my office and get some stuff from my desk.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Eh, that's ascertainment bias. The polling data is pretty consistent.I have to say, I think a month ago I would've agreed with you. I think sentiment has changed pretty quickly over the last few weeks, at least in the somewhat small circles that I deal with.
Eh, that's ascertainment bias. The polling data is pretty consistent.
For starters:I don’t disagree and it is certainly limited in scope. I’ve just seen a shift in every group I interact with (friends, family, coworkers, golf groups).
Do you have a link to some of the polling data for it?
For starters:
For starters:
New Harvard poll shows the split on support for re-opening is down to 46% for and 51% against. Over 70% were against a month ago.
What 70% poll are you referring to? Besides that, I believe the original post that sparked this discussion was in reference to "opening up everything" which the Harvard poll you linked doesn't cover.
Now that I've gone back and re-read his post a 3rd time (heh, see my earlier edit about masks), I can see the point you are making, BUT, his immediate follow up point was that "majority of people across the political spectrum are supportive of key public health measures like maintaining shutdowns of most non-essential businesses."
Perhaps I should've been more specific in my original reply as to what exactly I was replying to, as that second sentence is where I think the public has largely flipped over the last month.
As for the 70%, I'll continue look for it. I saw a screenshot of it yesterday (it was apparently the same poll run back in April), but I haven't been able to locate it or the poll this morning.
Ivermectin!?
Does that explain why no outbreak among pets and livestock?
And why were these human trials started in June? In Australia?
And Gates is funding these trials? I guess Trump won’t tout it and media won’t mock it...
Sometimes side effects are more deadly than the disease.What do you have to lose?
Sometimes side effects are more deadly than the disease.
I agree with that. I was just surprised then I am still surprised but not surprised that I am not seeing or hearing anymore about it. Drives me crazy.People should be allowed to take it. If it appears to be working and has been approved to treat other conditions then let the doctors use it. What do you have to lose?
I feel like I'm trying to solve some sort of puzzle.I agree with that. I was just surprised then I am still surprised but not surprised that I am not seeing or hearing anymore about it. Drives me crazy.
I am too as well as an RN friend of mine..I am unhappy with the trend in alabama.
ALABAMA: 12 deaths per 100,000. Total deaths: 581. Total cases: 15,775. After its stay-at-home order expired at the end of April, the state moved to a “Safer at Home” order that urged residents to minimize travel and banned public gatherings unless social distancing can be maintained. The order was amended to continue until July 3. The state has allowed retail stores to operate at 50% of capacity, while restaurants, bars, gyms and some personal care services were allowed to reopen with restrictions. State beaches also were reopened.