Yeah. The general consensus as long as I can remember has been to rate leveled or slabbed site-built homes no lower than EF3, even if frail or unanchored. I’ve noticed that certain WFOs such as Memphis and Springfield, have been pushing it all the way down to EF2 as of late. It sets a bad precedent, and starts an unintentional “how low can you go” contest among other WFOs. There NEEDS to be more clear guidelines for dealing with structural deficiencies, and more consistency among WFOs. This is not ok.
Also, following a damaging tornado event, I should not be able to look at the responsible WFO before the survey and be able to say “yup, this is gonna be a lowballed survey” or “Oh good, these guys are usually pretty objective. This should be a reasonable survey”. Yet I can. Consistently.