xJownage
Member
I'm a bit confused about your point here. That QLCS was dropping tornadoes left and right all the way across Alabama. BMX has surveyed 17 tornadoes (so far), and HUN surveyed an additional 6.
We may not have had a swarm of EF4-EF5 tornadoes in Alabama, or a two-mile wide record setting tornado, but Easter Sunday is currently tied with April 28, 2014 for being the fourth largest tornado outbreak in Alabama history (with surveys still ongoing)... and five of those tornadoes were rated as strong. If anyone is saying that the event busted in Alabama or it significantly under-performed, they need to find something else to do with their time other than weather.
Feels like we dodged a bullet in Alabama for the most part. Not to belittle the damaged experienced in some areas, but with our state having been squarely in the bullseye of the moderate risk and considering the devastation from the stronger tornadoes, we were very lucky.
Thanks to all of you for making it blatantly obvious you didn't read my original post. I was never referring to AL as a whole. Not once. It was ONLY about southern AL. I thought I made that more than clear enough. All due respect Fred, but I'd appreciate if you weren't condescending towards somebody who was presenting QUESTIONS about the event in hopes of gaining a greater understanding of what happened.Huh? We just had the fifth largest outbreak of tornadoes in Alabama from the QLCS and embedded super cell structures. Several of them strong...
I wasn't discussing this either. If you look at the storm reports, there's a big gap between Southern MS and Southern GA, both of which have a large number of tornado reports. Three violent supercells died on he MS/AL border at almost the exact same location. Several storm clusters in S MS never organized in the first place, but once they got into GA and further east, an organized MCS caused multiple tornadoes. If we want to say that tornado risk is minimized where the height contour becomes the southern bound, doesn't that exclude the Hattiesburg area and Southern GA as well?And had people looked at more than just the placement of higher instability, they would've expected that ahead of time. Ask Kory about the discussion I had with my team. We talked about forcing and the height field not actually supporting major activity in far south Alabama 72+ hours ahead of time. Everybody was letting CAPE drive their placement when the highest threat area is always where forcing intersects where the best shear and instability combo is located. The 576dm height contour at 500mb is very very often a good southern bound for the greatest threat. There are sometimes exceptions to that, but not often at all. Even when the SPC was drawing their higher risk area near the coast, the 576dm height contour was never expected to get south of around Montgomery.
To the people that looked at everything, this always looked like a central/north type of threat. The only real part that busted about the thing is that north/northwest AL stayed locked in the cool air.
I don't even use any other forums, the only other weather related media I use is the stormtrack discord. While in the stormtrack discord at the time, I made it abundantly clear that people calling for a bust were being very short-sighted. I didn't even anticipate the greatest threat until around 00Z anyways, as the CAMs had been insistent for days that ALL of AL was going to get hit very hard. The HRRR had been very insistent that elevated convection in LA was going to become surface based as one or two long tracked supercells, and I had been watching the LA cells as a result before they ever went surface based, and watched them organize around McComb, MS. After nailing that part of the forecast the HRRR also insisted those cells would continue through AL until growing upscale later on into a QLCS.Didn't you drop a "this is busting" post on another forum right before everything went haywire on Sunday afternoon?
Last edited: