Kory
Member
- Messages
- 4,928
- Location
- Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Check out this thread. I think there are some important things highlighted in here.
Check out this thread. I think there are some important things highlighted in here.
That was a key point of some of the responses...especially Jason Davis a forecaster from NWS Birmingham.To be fair, the NAM 3km loves squalls on seemingly every big event. Every other model is hitting Dixie hard and the NAM just throws messy convection and a giant squall line despite the high parameters.
I hope that this is not the case too many people I love are in this are. I have already been texting them today to make plans for this. Last time everyone was at work. I am really afraid what might happen if any tornadoes hit a town directly in Mississippi or Alabama since everyone will be at home.
I would think that everyone being close to home is a good thing. Also, I don't think that we will have an issue where a morning round of storms will knock power out for 100000s of people. That created a nightmare 9 years ago. And, I doubt that everyone has already forgotten about that superoutbreak. This is not an April 1974 to April 2011 gap.Honestly at the time frame of the storms to move through, most people would have been home regardless. But we are going to have to watch this closely and those that have reach make sure people are aware this is coming.
That was a key point of some of the responses...especially Jason Davis a forecaster from NWS Birmingham.
This Twitter thread over on Tony Lyza's account has some pertinent information regarding the convective NAM's current handling of this situation:
(Click the timestamp to see the full thread.)
The morning convection spared millions more of those living in the midwest and upper south from the discreet supercells that developed across the southeast on 27 April 2011. There have been several times that the SPC goes High and a squall line comes in to "save the day" from the long-track strong-violent tornadoes. Last April or so over Texas & plains had 27 April 2011 parameters but turned out to be a bit of a "Forecasted Convective Amplification Deficiency." Yes, there was an outbreak that caused death and destruction, but the strongest tornadoes were "only" EF-3s.To be fair, the NAM 3km loves squalls on seemingly every big event. Every other model is hitting Dixie hard and the NAM just throws messy convection and a giant squall line despite the high parameters.
I believe you're referring to 5/20, and if that's the case it wasn't the early day convection that saved anybody, but the unexpectedly stout cap that killed every storm that tried to fire in the warm sector. Morning convection isn't necessarily something that will stop an event when you have such an unstable airmass still, as even with the morning convection the models are still showing a very unstable airmass moving into the region quickly. The northern extent of the higher-end tornado threat depends on how far north that air gets.The morning convection spared millions more of those living in the midwest and upper south from the discreet supercells that developed across the southeast on 27 April 2011. There have been several times that the SPC goes High and a squall line comes in to "save the day" from the long-track strong-violent tornadoes. Last April or so over Texas & plains had 27 April 2011 parameters but turned out to be a bit of a "Forecasted Convective Amplification Deficiency." Yes, there was an outbreak that caused death and destruction, but the strongest tornadoes were "only" EF-3s.
The morning convection spared millions more of those living in the midwest and upper south from the discreet supercells that developed across the southeast on 27 April 2011. There have been several times that the SPC goes High and a squall line comes in to "save the day" from the long-track strong-violent tornadoes. Last April or so over Texas & plains had 27 April 2011 parameters but turned out to be a bit of a "Forecasted Convective Amplification Deficiency." Yes, there was an outbreak that caused death and destruction, but the strongest tornadoes were "only" EF-3s.
Yeah, we’re not going to come close to the instability profiles of that day.But to reiterate, this is nothing like 4/27/11....