Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
So what? What does the WB have to do with this "episode" now, other than being a strawman for people who want to distract from substance of the impeachment inquiry?Are you kidding ? He's the one that started this episode.
Evan, it allowed them to spread terrorism through out the region.
Trump is the one that started it with his “perfect” phone call that he still won’t release the transcript of or let anybody talk about.Are you kidding ? He's the one that started this episode.
So what? What does the WB have to do with this "episode" now, other than being a strawman for people who want to distract from substance of the impeachment inquiry?
Good luck Evan. Hope you are ready for the crap show heading your way. Mark Zaid Evan is a hack. He is not apolitical.
I would love to hear an explanation of this. How, exactly, was Seth Rich at the heart of Russia's compromise of the DNC's network. There is concrete and specific evidence that Russia, and only Russia, was the one behind the compromise of the DNC's network and removal of the data that was then linked to Wikileaks.
I refer you to pages 36 - 50 of the Mueller report.
We know EXACTLY how Russia gained access to the DNC's network including specific dates/times, credentials used, the exact malware they used to sniff for and exfiltrate data, and how they initially vectored into the DNC network from the DCCC's network. Russia's military intelligence agency, the GRU, spearfished the credentials of a DCCC employee, and once they had those creds and access to the DCCC's network, they used malware and keyloggers to suck up more credentials including that of IT administrators who had full access to the DCCC network. Once they had full access to the DCCC'S network, they located a direct VPN connection that connected to the DNC's network. Once they had access to the DNC's network, they deployed the same malware they used on the DCCC and began to harvest more user credentials and every bit of data they could find.
Not only does the United States have server logs, user activity logs, etc, but allied intelligence agencies compromised several GRU units themselves and gained access to their internal chat logs, activity logs, and further evidence that shows from A-Z exactly how the GRU pulled off their attacks. Oh, and we also have public records a researcher uncovered because the GRU was lazy/sloppy and used the same link-shortening service several times consecutively for their spearfishing attacks, so we know exactly who they targeted in their spearfishing attacks.
This is some vague assertion that "the Russians probably did this." We know the exact GRU units that did it, their location, IPs used, intermediate servers used for data exfil, the names of the personnel in each unit and what they individually did, and we have full logs and data of everything they did in those times periods -- not just their attacks on the DCCC, DNC, Clinton campaign, and other groups both inside and outside the United States. That's why Mueller won indictments for a significant number of INDIVIDUAL GRU employees who participated in these operations.
We also have one of the intermediary servers the GRU leased in an Arizona data center. Did I mention we also have the full logs from the AWS servers the DNC used that the GRU gained access to after stealing the necessary credentials? And that those logs show the GRU snapshotting over 300gb worth of data the DNC had stored on AWS?
But, yeah, I guess it makes more sense to think a guy with zero known hacking or INFOSEC ability somehow managed to gain access to and deploy custom developed malware and rootkits that only the GRU has been known to use.
See here for a discussion of the purpose built malware the GRU used and why we positively know the GRU is the source (one main reason being one of their agents created it and used his own name in the repo).
Did I forget to mention that we also have the logs and rental agreements from dozens of servers the GRU used all over the world, and that their IPs match back to the IPs used to exfiltrate the data that was stolen from the DCCC and DNC? Apparently Seth Rich was literally rich because we're talking a huge amount of funds required for custom malware, dozens of servers throughout the world, and man hours far beyond what a single person (or even a small team with significant experience) would be capable of.
There's simply zero rationality or evidence behind the Seth Rich conspiracy. We don't just have a smoking gun that says it was the GRU. We have hundreds of incontrovertible and indisputable pieces of DIRECT evidence that show every single action the GRU took, who was involved, how they did it, what tools they used, etc. This isn't just soup to nuts. This is a 75 course buffet of the most damning computer and tech evidence possible.
I realize some people think the DNC had just some kind of old unpatched Windows Server 2012 r2 box in their basement, but that's not at all how their infrastructure was setup. There were multiple servers. There were also cloud-based servers and data-storage. They had enterprise level IT, servers, and networks. This wasn't an easy task even if a person had in-person physical access. This was a sophisticated attack that took place over an extended period of time, and we have full visibility into exactly what took place.
I think people aren’t understanding that we haven’t seen any evidence that Biden’s son was doing something corrupt.
We also have to understand that it doesn’t matter how guilty Hunter is, it is illegal for trump to tie aid to investigating him.
This is one of the more sane theories I've heard. If anything should be investigated it should be that contact from Joe Biden. I hate to say it but people get paid to sit on boards of companies they don't understand or play an active role in. There is nothing illegal about that unless it was done as a larger scheme that involved his father and could be conceived as use of office for personal gain.I do not think Hunter Biden was doing anything corrupt. I think he was holding a job at the request of Joe Biden. When the company that was paying Hunter came under investigation, that is when Joe jumped in. I think it is Joe Biden that should be prosecuted not Hunter.
Until the Democrats and Republicans both agree that Joe Biden should be prosecuted his actions. If they do not, then what they are saying that Joe Biden's actions were not illegal and therefore neither can be what they are accusing Donald Trump over regardless of facts or no facts.
As somebody who sits on boards, it is very common practice to bring in people from other backgrounds. I'm unsure of Hunter's resume, but the whole thing still seems a bit suspicious.This is one of the more sane theories I've heard. If anything should be investigated it should be that contact from Joe Biden. I hate to say it but people get paid to sit on boards of companies they don't understand or play an active role in. There is nothing illegal about that unless it was done as a larger scheme that involved his father and could be conceived as use of office for personal gain.
For the record I like Joe Biden. He seems like a good guy and I see him on the McCain level of people that try to work out solutions. However, I am having a hard time seeing him as President. At this point I'm voting for the Giant Meteor.
Can you be more specific on out of touch? What is it they do not understand?As somebody who sits on boards, it is very common practice to bring in people from other backgrounds. I'm unsure of Hunter's resume, but the whole thing still seems a bit suspicious.
I'm tired of really old people being president. They are just too out of touch with what is going on.
I don't think they understand (or want to understand) technology like they should, or the issues of the average American under the age of 40. They have too many rich cronies they want to please.Can you be more specific on out of touch? What is it they do not understand?
I don't know... Trump seems to have a firm understanding of TwitterI don't think they understand (or want to understand) technology like they should, or the issues of the average American under the age of 40. They have too many rich cronies they want to please.
Haaa. Seriously though, look at his former director of cybersecurity.I don't know... Trump seems to have a firm understanding of Twitter
Again, why would it matter if he is biased? He is supposed to do what is best for his client anyway. He's a private attorney.This sounds like an apolitical lawyer to me. I believe the guy is not impartial nor unbiased.
'Coup has started,' whistleblower's attorney said in 2017 posts calling for impeachment
Mark Zaid, one of the attorneys representing the whistleblower at the center of the Democrats' ongoing impeachment inquiry, tweeted conspicuously in January 2017 that a "coup has started" and that "impeachment will follow ultimately."www.foxnews.com
Haaa. Seriously though, look at his former director of cybersecurity.
Are you a politician? Are you Rudy Giuliani?Are you saying I am to old to be the director of Cybersecurity?
Are you a politician? Are you Rudy Giuliani?
It's largely the age combined with the career.
But, having hired many people in the cybersecurity and technology realm, I have had better luck with people under the age of 70, with a few notable exceptions. One of my brightest and most motivated people is 77.