Here's the 12z not sure if it's as bad but looks pretty darn similar.
View attachment 18220View attachment 18221
Okay, now
that kind of setup, especially with its low-amplitude background, would signal not just a significant tornado outbreak, but also something that, with sufficient instability, could conceivably prove historic for early March, or at least fairly respectable vs. historical high-end tornado outbreaks during the same timeframe. Again, however, I am still skeptical about the amplitude and configuration, especially five days out. There have been some notable low-amplitude setups in recent years, but they have become less common than previously, and several modelled events as such have “Atmospheric Anti-Climax” in the short range. The ECMWF’s big shift toward the GFS
is potentially significant, but only if sustained within a few days of the event itself. What stands out on the last few runs is the trend toward a deeper trough over the Rockies, which would tend to lower heights off to the east, yielding a potentially broader-based, negatively-tilted solution.
If the setup still looks like this within forty-eight hours of the event, then I’ll certainly be willing to call for a significant, if not potentially historic, tornado outbreak. At this point a major wind-driven event almost looks like a given, but I don’t think we should issue a call on EF2+ tornado families until very near the event. Until then I’ll stay on the skeptical, cautious side in regard to multiple (two or more) EF2+ tornado families.