• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER
  • April 2024 Weather Video of the Month
    Post your nominations now!

Severe WX December 10 & 11, 2021 Severe Threat

andyhb

Member
Meteorologist
Messages
1,294
Reaction score
4,008
Location
Norman, OK
Unfortunately that better news from Mayfield is offset by worse news coming from Dawson Springs. Up to 13 dead there with at least 100 missing.
 

buckeye05

Member
Messages
3,406
Reaction score
5,390
Location
Colorado
If they go with an EF5 rating, it could come down to a few houses or buildings in a rural area like above, rather than a lot of the more visually dramatic and concentrated damage in towns.
 

buckeye05

Member
Messages
3,406
Reaction score
5,390
Location
Colorado
I hate how I'm already seeing the default dismissiveness about the potential rating of this from mets on other sites, pretty much already insinuating not to expect a high-end rating. Nobody who is surveying should be going in with a skeptical attitude, but rather an objective one. There is definitely some kind of weird psychological phenomenon that causes an "upgrade hesitance" within the portion of the meteorological community that is responsible for damage surveying.
 
Messages
916
Reaction score
935
Location
Augusta, Kansas
I hate how I'm already seeing the default dismissiveness about the potential rating of this from mets on other sites, pretty much already insinuating not to expect a high-end rating. Nobody who is surveying should be going in with a skeptical attitude, but rather an objective one. There is definitely some kind of weird psychological phenomenon that causes an "upgrade hesitance" within the portion of the meteorological community that is responsible for damage surveying.
Why hasn't even an EF4 rating been handed out for at least one of these tornadoes?
 
Messages
641
Reaction score
494
Location
St. Catharines, Ontario
I hate how I'm already seeing the default dismissiveness about the potential rating of this from mets on other sites, pretty much already insinuating not to expect a high-end rating. Nobody who is surveying should be going in with a skeptical attitude, but rather an objective one. There is definitely some kind of weird psychological phenomenon that causes an "upgrade hesitance" within the portion of the meteorological community that is responsible for damage surveying.
Where are you seeing this?
 
Messages
2,266
Reaction score
2,877
Location
Missouri
Why hasn't even an EF4 rating been handed out for at least one of these tornadoes?
I think more detailed surveys are going to be done starting Monday, we're only at the preliminary phase right now....that said, if an EF5 rating isn't handed out to at least tornado from this outbreak I'm going to scream. Lol.
 

pohnpei

Member
Messages
977
Reaction score
1,997
Location
shanghai
From what I can tell now, this tornado literally did slab after slab after slab from Cayce all the way down to at least Bremen. It had even more slabs than Hackleburg.

So I know many people would questioned about the construction about houses or something. But Hackleburg had large sections of EF5 rating and I just don't believe houses that Hackleburg encountered throughout its path were all way better than this one.

If they finally didn't manage to find even one EF5 point among so great amounts of complete destruction from different types of building. I would be really disappointed and lose faith in this system.
 
Messages
2,266
Reaction score
2,877
Location
Missouri
From what I can tell now, this tornado literally did slab after slab after slab from Cayce all the way down to at least Bremen. It had even more slabs than Hackleburg.

So I know many people would questioned about the construction about houses or something. But Hackleburg had large sections of EF5 rating and I just don't believe houses that Hackleburg encountered throughout its path was way better than this one.

If they finally didn't manage to find even one EF5 point among so great amounts of complete destruction from different types of building. I would be really disappointed and lose faith in this system.
Yeah this whole mindset of 'conservative = accurate' when it comes to tornado ratings needs to stop, now. So many underrated tornadoes in the past decade (Chickasha, Goldsby, Vilonia and Chapman 2016 being the ones discussed most often on this site) that if not a single EF5 from this accurate then I'm giving up with the EF scale, or at least how it's currently administered.
 
Messages
3,013
Reaction score
5,186
Location
Madison, WI
Yeah this whole mindset of 'conservative = accurate' when it comes to tornado ratings needs to stop, now. So many underrated tornadoes in the past decade (Chickasha, Goldsby, Vilonia and Chapman 2016 being the ones discussed most often on this site) that if not a single EF5 from this accurate then I'm giving up with the EF scale, or at least how it's currently administered.

The worst part is that the "EF5 hesitancy" has spilled over into other things like some WFOs trying to go below lower bound and, for example, rate a slabbed frame home as EF2 when the scale states that minimum for that DI/DOD is EF3 if it was poorly anchored. I recall at least a couple of instances of that being posted about on this forum, although at least one of them got corrected in short order.
 

TH2002

Member
Sustaining Member
Messages
3,647
Reaction score
6,044
Location
California, United States
Special Affiliations
  1. SKYWARN® Volunteer
The worst part is that the "EF5 hesitancy" has spilled over into other things like some WFOs trying to go below lower bound and, for example, rate a slabbed frame home as EF2 when the scale states that minimum for that DI/DOD is EF3 if it was poorly anchored. I recall at least a couple of instances of that being posted about on this forum, although at least one of them got corrected in short order.
The absolute WORST case of a WFO going "below lower bound" I can think of is Smithfield NY 2014. A three story farmhouse bolted to a CMU foundation was completely obliterated and swept away, with debris thrown downwind. They deemed it 135MPH EF2.
 
Messages
2,266
Reaction score
2,877
Location
Missouri
The absolute WORST case of a WFO going "below lower bound" I can think of is Smithfield NY 2014. A three story farmhouse bolted to a CMU foundation was completely obliterated and swept away, with debris thrown downwind. They deemed it 135MPH EF2.
EF2? Uhhhhhhhh..........
 
Back
Top